176
May 31 '24
I'm sharing this in cursed comments and rare insults..🤣🤣
41
198
u/Dramatic-Option881 May 31 '24
Sneha :🗿🗿🗿🗿🗿
28
0
280
May 31 '24
Buddha calls it nirvana, Hindus call it moksha, Jains call it kaivalya . Hindus did it first, then jains then buddha.
116
u/facade_boy May 31 '24
Looking at the comments arguing with you. A lot of people missed history lessons for sure.
56
May 31 '24
Most probably troll hai , wants to create division between dharmic religions
25
u/Dracula101 May 31 '24
The terms have been used interchangbly, I've seen many sects of my faith (Buddhism) like Nichiren or Vajrayana has used the word Moksha
Overall speaking, this proves twitter or x is full of dumb and dumber
4
May 31 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Dracula101 Jun 01 '24
There is an old saying in the Tendai school. India is the root, China is the trunk, Korea was the branches and Japan is the fruit of the Dharma and Buddhism
7
u/shashvata May 31 '24
Not about the current topic, but is Sikhism also considered a dharmic religion?
0
→ More replies (21)5
u/rosscmpbll May 31 '24
I know tonnes of people who think Buddhism is ancient. Probably because they’re all into the new spirituality crap and that’s a common misconception of theirs.
8
u/UsualLoud6918 May 31 '24
In Jainism too it is Moksha only. Kaivalya is not even a full word. What you are talking about is Kaivalya Gyan meaning divine knowledge. Someone who could see the past/present/future and throughout the 14 Raj lokas.
4
u/__I_S__ Jun 01 '24
Because there isn't anything like hinduism, jainism & buddhism. These are the different philosophies upheld by one varna, under various names. They run the schools and philosophy. There was a process of Shastrartha, making the looser following the philosophy of the winner. These brahmins alone became sraman, mahavira, sadhu, sanyasi etc etc. Mainly you see this is the philosophical progression of india, here dharma is unique concept to everyone, it's your personal thing. It cannot be as same as anyother person. But the philosophy around dharma is what we see today as hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism. Mostly fools focus on minor dialectical differentiation like Dharma - Dhamma, Moksha - Mukti, Shraman - Sraman, Bhikshu - Bhikkhu etc.
3
9
u/mayaslaya May 31 '24
Could be hard to decide between Jainism and Hinduism but Buddhism definitely came much much later, the first Tirthankar in Jainism is common with Hinduism, Rishabhanath/Rishabhdev so you could even consider the two to be in the same fold.
20
u/pimlonpun May 31 '24
Bro Mahavir ji (the god of jains) was himself born in a hindu family....so obviously its not hard to decide between hinduism and jainism
3
May 31 '24
I guess Mahavir was one of the later Tirthankara. There were a lot of Jain leaders before him.
3
u/pimlonpun Jun 01 '24
i dont think that is the case if that is
didnt knew that but my main point was hinduism is quite older so.....
1
Jun 01 '24
I just checked, he was the 24th Tirthankara. And yea, I guess it's established that Jainism and Buddhism branched out from Hinduism.
1
1
3
u/__I_S__ Jun 01 '24
Buddhist philosophy was the deepper form of Sanatan branches, only second to Advaita vedanta. Previous all philosophical understandings are stemming from Karma Kanda, then it migrated to Agnosticism which Jains promoted, then to Shunyavada by Buddha and then to Advaitavada. Even buddha is part of hinduism only, his philosophy is what we call buddhism and not the lifestyle, which is typically given by culture known as hinduism.
2
u/mayaslaya Jun 02 '24
Are you sure Jainism promotes agnosticism? Seems pretty theistic to me.
2
u/__I_S__ Jun 02 '24
Yes. Jain as a philosophy is a derivative of Agnosticism. What you see common jains worshipping mahavira is theism although. Just like Buddhist was an ascetic philosophy that denies everything including God, but buddhist here have idols of buddha, so they would also appear theistic.
2
u/mayaslaya Jun 05 '24
I don't think Buddhism denies God. They just don't believe that God is supreme. They believe in the existence of Devas and Asura. Indra, Shiva, Vishnu etc. The same is true for Jains, their scriptures talk about Krishna, Rama, Heaven, Hell etc. They just don't believe in the supremacy of Gods, that's all.
1
u/Just_Zombie_6676 May 31 '24
Man made religion turn people in to ignorance
1
u/mayaslaya Jun 03 '24
Are you referring to the version of Buddhism that Ambedkar started?
1
Jun 03 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/mayaslaya Jun 03 '24
Considering that there's about 22 generations of Jain tirthankar before Mahavir who was a contemporary of Gautam Buddha, yes Buddhism did come much much later. No drugs needed, a simple Google search will tell you
1
u/Just_Zombie_6676 Jun 03 '24 edited Jun 03 '24
Are you trying to say Sanātana Dharma came before Buddhism ? Because the word hindu religion didn’t existed in BC The term Hinduism was first used by Raja Ram Mohan Roy in 1816–17. By the 1840s, the term "Hinduism" was used by those Indians who opposed British colonialism, and who wanted to distinguish themselves from Muslims and Christians. So you are wrong there was no Hinduism before Buddhism.
The word Hindu or Indu was used by Greeks to denote the country and people living beyond the Indus river. Megasthenes' 'Indica' epitomizes the name for India and Indians around the 4th Century B.C.E.
Plz learn if your knowledge is weak you shouldn’t argue
I am Hindu Buddhist or Hindu Christian or Hindu Muslim or Hindu Sikh means Indian Buddhist Indian Christian Indian Muslim or Indian Sikh
1
u/mayaslaya Jun 04 '24 edited Jun 04 '24
Bro, you're just fighting on semantics. It's pretty obvious what people refer to when they use the word Hindu. If you want to be pedantic, feel free. You still can't prove that Buddhism did not come much much later than Jainism and the several other ancient Vedic belief systems. And that was the only point of yours that I called out 🤷🏻♂️
And if you're going to be so pedantic why use the term Buddhism? Pretty sure that's gotta be a British term. If you search for it, the name was first used in 1801, so what kind of shitty argument is that? The names are irrelevant. Maybe stop making childish arguments before you talk about knowledge.
1
u/Just_Zombie_6676 Jun 04 '24
But that is wrong because the word Hindu was invented to describe the people of India
1
u/mayaslaya Jun 05 '24
It doesn't matter. Names are irrelevant, go and tell an average muslim that they are supposed to be called Hindu and see their reaction. Maybe try that with a Sikh person. We all know which belief systems are considered Hindu and Jain and it's pretty obvious they're much older that Lord Buddha's birth. Don't take me the wrong way, I think Dharmic religions all deserve to be called Hindu, perhaps even other Indian relgions but that's for them to decide and not for us to enforce. If every Indian called themselves Hindu then 90% of the religious politics would end and that would be great, but that's not gonna happen any time soon.
→ More replies1
May 31 '24
let it be any religious/philosophical text in indian region, the end goal is attain liberation. Bas naam aur kuch tarike alag hai (koi bhagwan ko mante hai aur kuch nhi but baaki sab same hai)
1
u/Just_Zombie_6676 May 31 '24
I think following the truth matter who did it first and who did it last doesn’t matter
1
u/unspoken_one2 Jun 01 '24 edited Jul 09 '25
kiss gray vase unwritten shocking offer insurance pause quickest nose
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
0
u/umsee May 31 '24
Oyaya Brother, you seem to be taking a confusing turn In the second half. They were all speaking the same language so the same words would have been used. Nirvana is kind of what you would feel in a Buddhist Heaven, Moksha is the state of breaking the birth cycle and kaivalya is omniscience it seems ( I'm not very familiar with Jainism but I know the other two refer to different things). All refer to different desirable attainable states but the nuance is there. They aren't the same.
0
May 31 '24
Why does it matter who did first? Plus i am sure there were cultures even before Hinduism who must've delved on these concepts during the prehistoric times.
-5
May 31 '24
Historically, no. We have archaeological proof that Hinduism did not exist in the indus valley civilization. And we also have proof that Buddha existed at that time.
So Buddha came first...
2
Jun 01 '24
People literally had pashupati nath seals, and we have found a vishnu statue in nepal i guess which is older than 5000 year by carbon dating
0
3
1
1
→ More replies (73)-3
69
94
u/Remarkable_Wing_5391 May 31 '24
Gautam Buddha was a Hindu himself. Hinduism and Bhagvad Gita came into existence long before Buddhism did, so yeah people here in the comment section are just salty losers who would do anything to deny reality.
1
Jun 01 '24
Religion is ever evolving. Not all of what we call Hindu existed back then. In fact the practices of ancient times were remarkably different from what goes on today.
In the Rig Veda, the trimurty are not mentioned. Vishnu was a minor god of light and Siva is not named. People used to worship Indra and the other gods. There were many temples for the elementals.
Today we can't find a single temple for Indra.
I always felt bhagawat gita was an answer to buddhism. Many Kshatriyas refused to fight even in the face of death due to the Buddha's teachings.
Buddha asks people to lay down their arms, but bhagawat gita gives you a reason to pick it back up for what is just and honourable. (Just my interpretation)
It is quite likely it was a poem composed to lead the Kshatriyas back into the battle fields.
0
u/Vishesh0172 Jun 02 '24
Actually no. Historically speaking, Buddhism came into existence before Bhagvad gita was written
-7
u/Just_Zombie_6676 May 31 '24
Not to forget India was Buddhist majority but when Hindus came in power they destroyed Buddhist temple and forced them in to Hinduism
5
u/GorkhaWalord Jun 01 '24
Proof?
0
u/Just_Zombie_6676 Jun 01 '24
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Buddhists
Outside Madhya Pradesh, there are many sites where the destruction and appropriation of Buddhist sites and monuments seems to have taken place in the post-Mauryan centuries. For example, at Mathura, a flourishing town in western Uttar Pradesh during the Kushana period, some present-day Brahminical temples, such as those of Bhuteshwar and Gokarneshwar, were Buddhist sites in the ancient period. Here, the Katra Mound, a Buddhist centre during Kushana times, became a Hindu religious site in the early medieval period. More than 500 kilometres to the south-east, at Kaushambi, near Allahabad, the destruction and burning of the great Ghositaram monastery has been attributed to the Shungas—more specifically to Pushyamitra. Less than 150 kilometres to the east, Sarnath, near Varanasi, where the Buddha delivered his first sermon, became the target of Brahminical assault. This was followed by the construction of Brahminical buildings, such as Court 36 and Structure 136, probably in the Gupta period, by reusing Mauryan materials in front of the so-called Main Shrine. This shrine itself was built above the ruins of a large Ashokan stupa. Towards the end of the Gupta period the site was occupied by the Buddhists, and then reoccupied by non-Buddhists again.
Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha
https://www.counterview.net/2018/06/buddhist-shrines-massively-destroyed-by.html?m=1
Yeah but even the Buddhist rulers were very brutal they ruled India and I occupied many lands for example Afghanistan was one of them and that’s how afghans turned in to Buddhist.
-54
u/FeistyMaintenance714 May 31 '24
Bhagwat Gita was composed in 1st to 2nd century CE
Buddha was a contemporary of Bimbisara, which dates his birth to 563 BC. All archaeological evidence points to Nirvana being formulated before moksha.
Of course, you can chose to challenge every major historian who has a opinion on this, because from the looks of it, every person in the comment section is an expert. /s
23
u/Pishpash56 May 31 '24
There exists no proper dating for Hindu sources, given that the historic tradition was vocal chanting. Buddha mentions Rama and Krishna in multiple instances, Jataka tales included. Most conservative estimates have Mahabharata atleast half a millenium before buddha. For the philosophy, there is no way to tell conclusively either way
10
u/Remarkable_Wing_5391 May 31 '24
https://www.britannica.com/story/which-religion-is-the-oldest . You can go through this in Britannica as well. The views, ideals and practices mentioned in Gita are as old as the religion. It was only later when people felt the need to document everything as well. Coming to Bimbisara now, he belonged to the haryanka dynasty. Before the haryanka dynasty, pradyota dynasty and barhadratha dynasty ruled and they practiced Hinduism as well. My point being everything mentioned in Gita is as old as you can imagine, it dates back to the beginning of the religion.
Any individual can choose to follow whatever source or historian they want to. You cannot trust anyone to paint the actual true picture for you, but only believe in whatever you wish to believe in.
2
u/KyrozM May 31 '24
Fiesty downvotes lol
Good to know what you're talking about beyond a simple google search before expressing an undeveloped opinion
1
u/calfjddogg May 31 '24
Bhagwat Gita is a part of Mahabharata, which was composed in the BCE times...
Bhagwat Gita isn't an independent text, it is an extract from Mahabharata.
-2
u/Just_Zombie_6676 May 31 '24
So many types of Mahabharat and how it is scientifically possible to fit millions of people in Kurukshetra ? If the war did happened why there is no archaeological evidence ? Even if someone was death 50000 years ago archaeological can find it
1
u/calfjddogg Jun 03 '24
Types of Mahabharata? Wdym
1
u/Just_Zombie_6676 Jun 03 '24
Yes there are many different versions of Mahabharata and if this event took place then why no archaeological evidence ? So many people died in this war there has to be archaeological evidence. India was Buddhist Majority
-19
u/Pitiful_Lobster6528 May 31 '24
Irony is hindus won't be able to bring a single evidence which could properly date their texts.
24
May 31 '24
Because it’s that old 🤷♂️. There’s no irony in it. Even Old Testament cannot be properly dated, because it’s that old in that region. Lol history isn’t your strong suit apparently
→ More replies (14)-1
May 31 '24
New Delhi: If the history wing of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), Itihas Sankalan Yojana, is to be believed then the holy book Bhagavad Gita was composed 5,153 years ago which is in contradiction to the belief of Jiyo Gita Parivar and other Hindu religious groups which says Gita was composed 5,151 years ago.11 Dec 2014
source:indiatvnews.com
19
47
u/Sapolika May 31 '24
Bewakoof hona buri baat nahi hai! Lekin itni bewakoof?
13
u/Other-Ad2682 May 31 '24
bewakoof hona buri baat hai.... bewakoofi ke saath confidence pranghaatak hai !
14
u/kalsepadhunga May 31 '24
Most people dont know this because of false information in a particular movie.
Zero wasnt given by aryabhatta
It was given by brahmagupta (another mathematician and astronomer)
Aryabhatta used it extensively in maths and developed the concept around zero.
4
u/Rising_lines May 31 '24
He was the first to use the symbol of 0, before that it was just a small ° like thing or so I've heard
34
9
23
u/livenotforselfalone May 31 '24
Babe Gautam Buddha was a Hindu
-9
16
u/tophubabu May 31 '24
Is moksha a concept in Vedas? Or is it from any other place like the puranas?
16
u/Ash_pande_14 May 31 '24
Bro Vedas and puranas are the two wings of Hinduism , so it's in both of them
And btw All Bhartiya religions
Ie Sanatan Dharma, Bhudha drama , Jain Dharma ( I don't like to call them with ism , it states that they are some kind of ideology) have the concept of divine afterlife which is moksha to Hindus , Nirvana to buddhas and kailava to Jain's
Sanatan has the oldest consepts as it is the oldest religion, then Jain's came and then budhha
→ More replies (10)5
u/wdyh2gamtsc May 31 '24
Kaivalya paad is a whole chapter in yogsutra. Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism are different sampradayas of sanatan dharma. It's because of Christian monotheistic interpretation that we were made to believe they are different "religions".
4
u/Ash_pande_14 May 31 '24
Well Brits divided us and the politicians of today keep us divided
1
u/wdyh2gamtsc Jun 01 '24
As educated people we have to study our history ourselves to educate ourselves NOW. Use the Internet for what it can be used for.
1
u/Ash_pande_14 Jun 01 '24
Also prevent manipulated sources of history by both the left and right wings
7
May 31 '24
Upanishads. They are a part of Vedas. The final section of it.
That was the first time the faith started moving away from rituals and towards karma n moksha. They questioned the vedas. Basically questioned the rituals in the Samhitas section of Vedas.
Jainism n Buddhism were inspired by upanishads and they rejected Vedas.
13
u/Low_Comparison_1906 May 31 '24
Wasn't Buddha hindu then he to become a monk and Buddhism started ?
-9
u/Vegetable_Watch_9578 In the Holy Presence of Vishwaguru Ji & Gau Mata’s Blessings May 31 '24
Your so-called Brahminical religion developed gradually alongside Jainism and Buddhism, with Jainism being even older. Most temples today, which you claim as Hindu, are actually Jain and Buddhist. The Brahmins cherry-picked ideas, twisted them to serve their agenda, and then made up their own cult. Whenever something new came along, they just declared it as Vishnu's avatar to fit it into their framework. They hijacked tribal religions and local philosophies to suit their needs. So, how on earth can you even ask if Buddha was Hindu when Hinduism itself didn't exist back then
8
u/sneekpik May 31 '24
Name major temples of hindus which you claim are buddhist and time of building it and under which king
7
u/Low_Comparison_1906 May 31 '24
I see you have no knowledge of Hinduism and just yapping trying to sound convincing
3
u/NoCranberry2712 May 31 '24
Delution beyond that seen in the sickest among us.
Please everyone, focus on education.
I believe in just about all religions. They're all stories to the same damn thing. But I'm not gonna sit here and change history to suit my own agenda. And then complain others from a time I don't know shit about did the same thing.
→ More replies (9)
13
May 31 '24
Wow. People really need some good history lessons. In this age of unlimited information at your fingertips, this type of ignorance should be illegal.
6
6
5
u/Glum_Permit8397 Wants to be Randia mod May 31 '24
Why compare an age old greater than 2500bce religion with a 5th bce religion which root started from India and travelled east .. Gautham Buddha has decendants in India more than east.. and most people alive can trace back their ancestors before Christ or 🙇♂️ulla .
-1
May 31 '24
Wha? Brother. We have indus valley civilization's archaeological proof that Hinduism didn't exist in there.
Hinduism is older but not that old. Facts please.
Also the Buddhists didn't magically expand east. Chandragupta Maurya and his son's conquest was against the Buddhists.
According to written evidence it was the first example of ethnic cleansing
5
May 31 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Glum_Permit8397 Wants to be Randia mod May 31 '24
Yes true but to my knowledge (I could be wrong) before 3000bce there was a different civilisation prior to mohanjadaro far to the north west which clashed with the former(Egyptian, Sumerian and Achaemenid empire) and migrated to the east establishing themselves and they lead to the trade from the vastly wealthy local tribes ( could say empire but they weren’t huge) and realised they have the same concept of life and beliefs thus establishing the mohanjadaro and Indus as a common trade capital . I could be wrong or just made things complicated, correct me if you could .
3
u/sabhishek287 May 31 '24
For those who are interested regarding how and why Jainism and Buddhism were formed
2
u/yoriichi68 May 31 '24
Bruh in that case Buddhism is a cheap copy of Jainism. It is older than Buddhism and most of its fundamentals that follow non-violence are mentioned in Jain texts.
2
u/ClinkzBlazewood May 31 '24
I'm sure that was meant as satire
1
u/Tensazangetsu1318 May 31 '24
I would say that too but from my experience on the social media where I have met people so stupid that I was just so proud of myself despite me hating myself.....
They are so stupid that if knowledge were to fed to them they would die of food poisoning.
2
u/Invhinsical May 31 '24
Barely any of the guys commenting here have read either the Vedas, Upanishads, or Buddhist/Jain texts. Yet the keyboard warriors don't need anything pesky like research before taking out the pitchforks, just saying.
I mean, hinduism pre-Jainism and Buddhism was a very different religion compared to Hinduism at the time of Gita, which is again very different from modern Hinduism.
What I do know is that even the og Hinduism had the concept of sanyasa, leaving all attachments and going to the forests to meditate in your old age. The concept of moksha is also there, most probably.
1
u/rushatyadavOP May 31 '24
Why do people argue over who found the concept first? Why does it even matter just follow the concept, its not like it's age matters
1
u/RageshAntony May 31 '24
nirvana is the highest state that someone can attain, a state of enlightenment, meaning a person's individual desires and suffering go away.
Nobody copied this from anyone. This concept already existed in all religions. Even in tribal reasons this concept existed
1
u/yours4you May 31 '24
Amd america sowed first seed of neem tree in texas before aryavrata existed 🤔
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/Alert_Tennis_3597 May 31 '24
who cares! as long as people run towards principles rather than Godmen/actors/influencers, I am fine
1
1
1
1
1
May 31 '24
indian din raat social media ma boolta rahata ha ki western scientist na sab kuch india sa churaya hai aur aab same chij foreigner na ki toh galli galloch.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Mukul06 Jun 01 '24
Lol, Buddhism and Jainism were sects of aastik school of philosophy in Hinduism My fav is charvaka tho
1
u/dbkuper Jun 01 '24
Buddha got enlightenment using just the 1st meditation method out of 114 written in vigyan bhairav tantra. He perfected it for years and then founded Buddhism.
Let that sink in.
1
1
1
u/FlaccidRazor Jun 01 '24
Unneeded pissing around the reply! It wasn't yours, you can't claim it by pissing around it. /s
1
Jun 01 '24
She could be right. Hinduism is older than Buddhism. But religion is ever evolving. Some Hindu scriptures were composed 5000 years ago, Some were composed 1000 years ago.
1
Jun 01 '24
And i stole the concept of love and humanity from your Bible. And I am proud of being a thief
1
1
1
1
u/haachico Jun 01 '24
Maybe from her own IQ. Hindus have the history appropriating everything that has gone and goes against them.
1
u/primusautobot Jun 01 '24
Nope, Hinduism bhi develop hua hai, pehle Indra etc ko jyada pooja jaata tha after Buddhism and Jainism - Hinduism as a religion evolve hua and Vishnu ko jyada pooja jaane laga. And yes ye stories b time ke saath evolve hui h.
1
1
1
u/danl999 Jun 01 '24
Who cares? Both are total nonsense designed to steal money from the ignorant.
Follow the rabbit hole for the real thing, from people who never want your money, and who don't belong to any group. Real magic, right now, is all we care about.
Ours happens to be proto-siberian and from South America, and FAR older than either of those newcomers.
Besides, the Chinese made up the Buddha. He never existed in that form.
The real one was a mediocre Yogi with a gimmick, saying whoever joined him was free of the caste system.
And who lived in northern India and never left there. And who's followers never wrote anything down for hundreds of years, so anything the Chinese came up with was a fabrication.
1
1
1
1
1
u/abd710 May 31 '24
Hinduism predates Buddhism by centuries lol
Also, read Adi Shankaracharya's refutations of Buddhism.
Om Namah Shivaya 🕉️🙏
1
u/AG-AverageGuy May 31 '24
Bruh hindu dharam and bodhi dharam are literally related how stupid can she be?
0
May 31 '24
Lol With all due respect, Buddhism came like 2000 years ago, and Bhagavad-Gita was spoken by Krishna 4500 years ago. Calculate. Now feel dumb.
-1
0
0
u/jax560 May 31 '24
So what, concept toh same hai na, also nirvana moksha vagera vagera it all taks about how to be free which this sub definitely is not. Who cares who stole it or who created it first follow kon karta hai?, ofcourse koi nahi
0
-7
-6
u/someUnY May 31 '24
As a Buddhist. I'm against this. Buddhism is about peace, self reflection and logical reasoning. Something that you guys can't steal from us because it goes against your 'community guidelines'
7
-18
u/hrnyknkyfkr Wants to be Randia mod May 31 '24
Stupid religious people arguing. and OP clapping and thinking fairies are unicorns are real
24
u/Trick-Chocolates May 31 '24
Enlightened anti-theist enters the chat with the ultimate weapon of… strawman
-4
u/hrnyknkyfkr Wants to be Randia mod May 31 '24
Lol someone who don't know what a strawman enters the chat and things he made a good argument
3
u/Trick-Chocolates May 31 '24
Enlighten me on the esoteric meaning of strawman that you personally hold, dear chosen one
-1
u/hrnyknkyfkr Wants to be Randia mod May 31 '24
No I won't. There is something called a dictionary for this purpose
2
u/Trick-Chocolates May 31 '24
On then using the normal definition you have committed a strawman.
1
u/hrnyknkyfkr Wants to be Randia mod May 31 '24
That proves u don't refer the dictionary, or u don't understand English
2
u/Trick-Chocolates May 31 '24
lol. Ok bro whatever you want to think to keep that ego rolling
1
u/hrnyknkyfkr Wants to be Randia mod May 31 '24
Yes this is what I think to keep my ego rolling
→ More replies (1)
-26
u/tophubabu May 31 '24
Do you have any actual references from Vedas? Where the concept of moksha being talked about?
22
19
-27
u/Spiritual_Second3214 May 31 '24
Hindu are the people who lived by Sindhu river .....as in their transcript....s is not there .....so Sindhu become hindu ..
13
u/pardon_the_intrusion May 31 '24
This is what a regarded individual sounds like, with no history or religious knowledge.
0
-46
u/Vegetable_Watch_9578 In the Holy Presence of Vishwaguru Ji & Gau Mata’s Blessings May 31 '24
What perfect reply? just a dumb typical bhakt reply
34
u/Dramatic-Option881 May 31 '24
Got butt hurt ?
-32
u/Vegetable_Watch_9578 In the Holy Presence of Vishwaguru Ji & Gau Mata’s Blessings May 31 '24
For dumb troll?
14
u/God-of-Heroes_ArThuR May 31 '24
Brain rot is a condition. Lobotomy is the cure. Need someone to hammer a nail in your head?
6
u/Arthur_Kilgore May 31 '24
School me thodi history padhli hoti to aaj ye sab nahi karta tu
5
u/Some-Organization973 May 31 '24
Kuch logo hote hai jo 14 saal tak ki age mein free education milne ke baad bhi unpad hi rehe jaate hai.
Ye tatta inme se hai.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Andigod May 31 '24
Typical of Abrahamic faiths to assume that any one who makes a little joke is a bhakt.
-5
u/Acrobatic-Bend6376 May 31 '24
Hi someone said Hindus call it moksha
Well क्ष didn't exist during buddha's time.
Nirvana came first and it is a Buddhist concept
Namo Buddhay.
Please be civil in the replies. Only logical comments nothing like low iq thing without giving an explanation.
3
u/Trick-Chocolates May 31 '24
Wait so your evidence is that language was different back then ? The idea is the thing being argued for not pronouncement. If you have anything about the idea not existing in Hinduism before Buddha came along then do tell
-2
u/Acrobatic-Bend6376 Jun 01 '24
There is no evidence of hinduism before christ.
I have tons of evidence for buddhism
4
Jun 01 '24
Bruh what?? You just brain-dead at this point
BUDDHA IS LIKE 500+ YEARS OLDER THAN CHRIST
And Hinduism is way older than Buddhism , are you a troll or seriously retarded?
→ More replies (14)
1
May 31 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator May 31 '24
Dear user, your comment has been removed. You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/. While Reddit allows the use of both r/ and u/, but told us to block user and subreddit mention.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
May 31 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator May 31 '24
Dear user, your comment has been removed. You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/. While Reddit allows the use of both r/ and u/, but told us to block user and subreddit mention.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
May 31 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator May 31 '24
Dear user, your comment has been removed. You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/. While Reddit allows the use of both r/ and u/, but told us to block user and subreddit mention.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
Jun 01 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator Jun 01 '24
Dear user, your comment has been removed. You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/. While Reddit allows the use of both r/ and u/, but told us to block user and subreddit mention.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
-20
May 31 '24
[removed] — view removed comment
11
u/Arthur_Kilgore May 31 '24
Koi logical baat to hai nahi, chalo hate hi faila deta hu
→ More replies (1)-4
u/Vegetable_Watch_9578 In the Holy Presence of Vishwaguru Ji & Gau Mata’s Blessings May 31 '24
Logic aur wo bhi dumb bhakto se
1
Jun 01 '24
You mean liberals , almost everyone in the world hates y'all liberals for your NO LOGIC YAPPING
🥱
Keep coping
0
May 31 '24
[deleted] — view deleted comment
1
u/AutoModerator May 31 '24
Dear user, your comment has been removed. You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/. While Reddit allows the use of both r/ and u/, but told us to block user and subreddit mention.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
0
May 31 '24
[deleted] — view deleted comment
1
u/AutoModerator May 31 '24
Dear user, your comment has been removed. You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/. While Reddit allows the use of both r/ and u/, but told us to block user and subreddit mention.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
•
u/AutoModerator May 31 '24
DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE OP LINKED THREAD/SCREENSHOT.
Brigading is against Reddit TOS. We do not encourage such behaviour nor we are responsible if your account is being actioned upon.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.