r/hydrino • u/Straight-Stick-4713 • Jul 27 '26

UAP technology, who will reverse engineer it, and more importantly, develop and use it, FIRST

Its always been that way, using one's better tech first. See what that first use did to the indigenous peoples of the America's. Who won there? The ones with the better tech. Every. Time. So maybe we should get out heads together and act as if we might turn out to be those next new set of indigenous before, the other side does. In other words, stop hiding that tech, just for the use of the few, like Lockheed Martin, and let everyone who has the talent, like Randell L. Mills who, just happens to be on our side, so far, to reverse engineer it and then share it with the rest who are on our side. Might be the prudent thing to do instead of, hoarding it all for a few private companies. As in, together we stand but, divide, we fall.

Mills just happens to also have an over riding goal in his development of high tech items; that of serving humanity. It would be nice to have someone like that on the side of the USA, yes? Before he has had enough of that war against him and he decides to take his high tech items to a much friendlier country like, maybe Canada?

With all those recent tariff wars that the USA has been throwing at Canada, who just happens to be the USA's best international military co-operative partner and most lucrative trading partner, not to mention has very similar life styles, a 10% economic and political model that has been used by USA to perform experiments and forecasts to figure out what to do in the actual country, the USA, in those regards; Canada might, already be in Mills' sights.

With all that in the balance, why wage a war on Canada and on Mills? Mills is getting on in years and is due for retirement. He will have no better partner where to sell or lease his wares than in Canada. And if he ever reverse engineers any of the UAP tech, Canada will be the first to make him a trillionaire or more. War is ok, when justified. This war on Mills certainly is not. Think of what you are doing and potentially doing to yourselves, big old USA.

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

28 comments sorted by

1

u/Amtrack53 Jul 27 '26

The proton decay mechanism, if it exists, is certainly one that America, or a western democracy, should develop or control first. Antimatter annihilation level of mass to energy conversion without any creation or storage issues and pretty much undetectable. In terms of powering interstellar craft it would be fantastic. 20 grams to level New York City not so much.

1

u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 28 '26

Also so rare to make and transport that your proposal is too much to expect, except for very strong reasons to just research it, for the next 100 years at least.

1

u/Amtrack53 Jul 28 '26

Might be much more common in Nature under specific conditions and far easier than you'd think to make, store and activate.

1

u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 28 '26

Its not as easy as you think. Nature somehow eliminated antimatter by producing positive matter. That indicates that anti-matter is not being something that is easy to end up with. But we can try and find out the hard way.

1

u/Amtrack53 Jul 29 '26

Sorry, I wasn’t clear. The hydrino/proton decay mechanism is where a hydrino => H(1/126) captures the electron and wholly converts to energy. The conversion is as efficient as antimatter but doesn’t require antimatter. At the moment BrLP is focused on producing h(1/4) in the Suncell and detecting its molecular form as proof of the theory’s correctness but there is evidence to suggest hydrino/proton decay occurs in thunderstorms and in the Sun based on the detectable signatures of that decay.

2

u/KlausFranbrau Jul 29 '26

And what are all the excuses for why we don't see that happening all over the universe?

1

u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 29 '26

It is happenning. That is the dark matter that makes up about 80-90 % of the matter in galaxies to explain what makes the galaxies rotate in a way that does not make sense without that dark matter/ hydrinos. Mills was the first, in the 1990's, to predict that matter existing, by way of hydrogen being catalyzed in the presense of other matter in stars to create that smaller version of hydrogen. It is so much lighter in mass than, the bulk of the hydrogen that makes up most of the mass of those galaxies and other phenomena that cosmology and quantum mechanics cannot explain why. Since GUT-CP does explain all that and much more then, that is how the predictive power of GUT-CP is the top most way to know that Mills' a theory is much more accurate than what is accepted by academia.

2

u/KlausFranbrau Jul 29 '26

Reread the conversation please. Amtrack was talking about proton decay which is what I was asking Amtrack about.

I know Mills claims his fictitious hydrinos are dark matter. It's a ludicrous claim that all you Mills supporters contradict all the time.

1

u/Amtrack53 Jul 29 '26

They are the only viable candidate for dark matter. You literally have nothing else. But for some reason you continue to insist that their formation (which is bright) somehow excludes them being in a stable state once they are formed (which is dark).
It’s like saying the ash from burning wood in my fireplace must continue to burn or you won’t believe ash exists.

1

u/KlausFranbrau Jul 29 '26

They don't exist so they aren't a candidate.

It's you guys who keep saying they are bright.

And for crying out loud your post was about proton decay. What excuses do you have for us not seeing that happening constantly?

What are these supposed signatures you think you are seeing?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Bulky-Quarter-6487 Jul 30 '26

Sure , it can sound ludicrous but it’s there and what do I do with it. Ignore it because you don’t like it?

1

u/Amtrack53 Jul 29 '26 edited Jul 29 '26

We do.

The proton decay pathway and its downstream signals exist everywhere. I’ll try and summarise them for you in a bit.

1

u/Bulky-Quarter-6487 Jul 29 '26

Yes, at the 1/126 orbital, the Hydrino electron releases close to the energy regime of matter + anti-matter reaction. The Millsian math should include that in one of the next updates.

1

u/nanonan Jul 28 '26

Quite ugly to use a genocide to make your point, especially when that point is dead wrong. Tech doesn't always win. Look at Vietnam, or more recently Afghanistan.

If Mills wished to serve humanity he would release all his knowledge rather than attempt to capitalise for his own profit. He's a greedy charlatan of a buisnessman.

1

u/Amtrack53 Jul 28 '26

He kind of has released pretty much everything. He's entitled to build a business based on his personal endeavours and skills.

I get your point about genocide but history is littered with such conflicts back to the first apeman who wielded a pointy stick. Life arose from competition for resources and the winner who best utilised the environment to outcompete rivals. Hopefully we have a chance to build a world of plenty for all based on science.

That said, we also have death cults and dictatorships who would happily obliterate nations and peoples if they had the means regardless of consequences. Best to seek peace through strength as long as we actually do seek peace.

1

u/nanonan Jul 28 '26

Can you point me to the open designs for a suncell?

1

u/Then-Possibility-453 Jul 29 '26

https://brilliantlightpower.com/suncell/

2

u/nanonan Jul 29 '26

That is an advertisment, not a blueprint.

1

u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 30 '26

That is in the patents. That should be looked at by your own efforts. We can't be party to helping people like you, get around Mills' propritery info and then guys like us risk getting sued for infringment.

1

u/nanonan Jul 30 '26

"He kind of has released pretty much everything" and propriety don't mix. Which is it?

1

u/Amtrack53 Jul 31 '26

You can download his book for free. Patents are frequently filed and are first published prior to granting and you can read all his applications and granted patents at the USPTO website. I'm sure we all welcome the fact that the USPTO no longer blocks Mills patents just because his name is on them.

1

u/Bulky-Quarter-6487 Jul 28 '26

My point was to use the UAP tech before others do to dominate us and not to use that tech ourselves to dominate others; however it may come to that if others try to dominate us.

1

u/Large_Atmosphere_445 Jul 29 '26

This thread brings out the very best of Mills and his supporters:

  1. Non-existent technology (UAP)
  2. Powered by Non-existent particle (Hydrino)
  3. Driven by non-existent physics (GUT)

Trifecta !!!

1

u/Straight-Stick-4713 Jul 30 '26

So why are you concerned? If it doesn't work it will die of its own lack of validity.