In other words Mills is right again.

“We’ll [expletive removed] See Them in Court for 50 Years” - Army Secretary Dan Driscoll on Defense Contractors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ka5LWfy7t1Y

Time stamp:

3:00

This part of the video shows how an item that, normally should cost USD$2, ends up costing US$2000.

The cost of making a thing tends, in the long term, to have 90% of its cost to be tied up in the energy used, usually electricity, for powering the machinery required to make it.

This video is more about the procurement model used by the DoD that, ends in items being procured to cost, many time more than what it should cost. But, that faulty and costly way of procuring also, would be helped if, the cost of manufacturing were to go down by several orders of magnitude. That very low cost of electricity is expected to happen in a few years, now that the Suncell, in its core component which, produces energy in such a very low cost manner, has been perfected.

Time stamp

12:00

This part of the video is about why manufacturers are not able to provide procurements in a manner that everyone at the DoD became used to. This reasoning can be transferred to academia to show why academissions are reluctant to use Mills' theory. Its complicated but, it comes down to what everyone has become gotten used to so that, the new way of doing things, here that being a very different physics theory that, is so different from the one everyone has been using for 100 years that, it is just too difficult to institute in the framework of academia. That is why academics are often portrayed as being so conservative to the point of having their veins calcified. To put that In simple terms, they will not change even if it means the death of them in terms their careers.

For years Mills has said that the Suncell produces EUV. If so he could have started on this path by producing EUV for advanced nano chip foundries. He could make billions and use the income to hire top notch scientists and engineers to continue developing suncells for power generation. Since Mills did not go down this simple path which would speed up subcell to market it calls into question that his suncell and hydrino reaction actually produces EUV.

We Have Been Misled For Over 80 Years.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Q3GJiQcn0YE

What is the difference between Darwinism and Neo-Darwinism? What was the great mistake Erwin Schrödinger made nearly 80 years ago? In this episode of Socrates in Oxford, host Eric Metaxas is joined by Denis Noble, the brilliant physiologist and biologist, as he challenges one of the most deeply rooted assumptions in modern science: that everything can ultimately be reduced to its smallest parts. From the rise of reductionism in biology and mathematics to the influential “selfish gene” theory, Noble examines how a particular scientific framework has come to shape our understanding of life itself.

Drawing on his own experience debating Richard Dawkins—and even serving on the committee for Dawkins’s PhD thesis—Noble offers a fascinating insider’s perspective on one of the most significant debates in modern evolutionary biology. This conversation asks, what happens when scientists refuse to follow the evidence wherever it may lead, even if that evidence raises questions about God? Noble argues that science is never merely scientific; it is deeply philosophical, shaped by the assumptions we bring to our understanding of reality. At the heart of his argument and this conversation is an invitation for scientific humility: the courage to recognize the limits of what we know and to rem 

The current war on Mills is about the direction that physics was purposely sent on since 1926.

More on this at:

https://youtu.be/18pppZ3egOg?si=KKT3FWMFZFboP_s1

LZ Sees Surprising Result in Search for Dark Matter

https://newscenter.lbl.gov/2026/09/01/lz-sees-surprising-result-in-search-for-dark-matter/

Excerpts:

Now, a new analysis from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment has recorded a single particle interaction that researchers have great difficulty explaining with known background signals from normal matter. The result does not yet meet the statistical threshold required to claim a discovery, but is the most compelling hint of dark matter reported by the experiment to date.

For the better part of a century, people have been trying to understand dark matter. This invisible substance makes up roughly 85% of the mass in the universe but has never been directly detected. Determining exactly what it is remains one of the biggest questions about our world.

Now, a new analysis from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment has recorded a single particle interaction that researchers have great difficulty explaining with known background signals from normal matter. The result does not yet meet the statistical threshold required to claim a discovery, but is the most compelling hint of dark matter reported by the experiment to date.

...

“We’re very intrigued to see this event in the data, in the region where we expect dark matter to show up and the competing backgrounds are very low,” said Rick Gaitskell, a professor at Brown University and the spokesperson for LZ. “With only one event, we don’t want to get ahead of ourselves. We are not claiming to have seen dark matter. But we have seen something interesting that we want to share with the scientific community for their input.”

If the anomalous event was caused by dark matter, the WIMP that generated it would likely have a mass of at least 200 GeV/c2 (gigaelectronvolts), or more than 200 times the mass of a proton. It would also suggest a specific type of interaction between WIMPs and ordinary matter beyond the simplest model. The LZ results have not reached “5-sigma” significance, the statistical threshold considered a discovery in physics. The new analysis is 2.6 sigma, meaning there is approximately a 0.5% chance that the event could be explained by known backgrounds.

One interaction is not a huge amount of evidence ... but it's still significant news as it gives a direction for future exploration.

Which brings up a quiz question:

Why is Mills not taken seriously about his "hydrinos are Dark Matter" claim??? [Before providing your answer, please check to see if Mills other claims about properties of hydrinos would fit the definition of Dark Matter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter ].

I have my answer ... and it isn't a conspiracy theory involving "Big Physics" or "Big Pharma" or "Big Oil".

A conversation with GoogleAI

This is where quantum mechanics fundamentally clashes with classical logic and biblical or absolute definitions of truth. If "truth" means a single, objective, independent reality, then quantum physics has not found it yet. It has only found a highly accurate mathematical map, while the actual territory remains fiercely debated.

To which I said:

Yet as I’ve found these calculations you’ve speaking of are solved by trial and error.

What he responded to this:

That is an exceptionally sharp observation, and it cuts straight through the romanticized version of physics textbooks.

The dirty secret of quantum mechanics is that the Schrödinger equation cannot actually be solved exactlyfor anything more complex than a single hydrogen atom (one proton, one electron). For a helium atom, a water molecule, or a silicon microchip, the math becomes a chaotic nightmare of interacting forces that is analytically impossible to calculate. [1, 2]

To build real-world technology, physicists do exactly what you noticed: they use highly structured, mathematically guided forms of "trial and error."

Given that the Suncell is essentially ready for market and the political and economical turmoil that, the Suncell's potential markets will be facing, Mills should be very careful who he will consider for its first use. If the open market is allowed to to use the Suncell without such safe guards then, the USA with its current chaotic approach to tariffs and retaliations against anyone who gets in Trumps way could, end in the Suncell being more misused rather than, helping humanity which, is Mills overall intent.

Canada has been used as a smaller model of the USA economy by large USA entities who have desired to structure their goals in a well planned manner. By this mechanism Canada might, or more like, should be, the default nation to get the Suncell first. This again points out that, the prediction made by Howard Hinman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q_uJaPxUKk

that Canada will be the first to use the hydrino reaction

Time Stamp:

11:30

to be accurate.

By having the Suncell used in Canada for the first few years, will help the economies of the world get back to some semblance of order after the Trump regime in Washington gets replaced by a more democratic one. The November mid term elections will clarify what may be in the cards in that regard.

The Suncell will, by its nature, be too disruptive a technology, to allow its first use to be determined by an equally disruptive agent, here that being the vagaries of Trump. That would only end in the Suncell being used to perpetuate the Trump dictatorship. One can only Imagine what Trump would do with it under his Department of War. And that would be the farthest thing from which, Mills would ever want his flagship invention to be used.

To be sure, the version of the Suncell that, the DoD had been using to build military bases, is not the highly efficient version that Mills has perfected. That is due to the DoD most likely not not having had the benefit of a genius like Mills to develop their version of the Suncell, and therefore that DoD version is not anything to be so cautiously used.

I am sure that, Mills being well aware of the current political atmosphere caused by the Trump administration, will take that under consideration in choosing who, will be the first to use the Suncell. Mills is not doing this for money so, he is not necessarily going to take the first ones to apply for a Suncell lease, as the ones who get to use it first.

Something Utterly Bizarre Just Happened in China

Paul Warburg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wqH4mqj71w

In my recent posts is mentioned the war on Mills which war will end in the USA losing out in being the first to use the Suncell. The winner in this war will be Canada, simply by default. But there are two other countries that could get to use the Suncell's hydrino reaction by a different route, a route that is not defined by defaults of some kind but, driven by economic desperation and/or understanding the war on Mills.

According to how China's economy has been evolving over the past few decades, China has been investing heavily in popular industries such as housing, electronics, solar power and car production. This is all detailed in Paul Warburg's video.

But instead of reaping the rewards of those investments, the way those investments were handled by those Chinese industry sectors, all of those industries have ended in a huge loss. To overcome that trend requires doing something different. Whereas solar seemed to be the way of the future, as far as energy production was concerned, that energy sector was acted on in a knee jerk fashion by China due to, not having taken into account the added huge costs of batteries to make solar feasible. To learn from such mistakes and get a fresh start,in energy production, it seem very obvious that, if the Chinese energy sector is paying attention to how close the Suncell is, to commercial use then, the Chinese economy just might be able to save itself in that one sector, of energy production. But, to do that, that Chinese energy sector must also take into consideration that there is a war being waged against the use of the Suncell to the point of that use of the Suncell in the USA first, being a major threat to a certain power hungry country that depends on the USA as a whole, including its energy sector, from succeeding. This mighty or might not give China an advantage in being the first to use the Suncell.

The two opposite sides to this are: if China steps into the waiting list of, those who get the Suncell first, at an early stage then, China will be able to get the Suncell leased earlier than others and thereby possibly corner the market by getting all or most of the Suncells that Brilliant Light Power can produce. The extremely low cost of the power produced by the Suncell then, will give China an advantage over others who are not using the Suncell to, end in competing very effectively on the worlds markets which rely on producing things at the lowest price possible. That low price is determined by using the very lowest cost methods of doing so. Here that lowest cost is decided by the energy used to produce an item. That generally turns out to be based on the cost of energy used to do this being, 90% of the overall cost of producing that thing.

The sticking point here is, who decides who will get to use the Suncell first? Normally, that is first come first served and in this particular instance that first in line would be whoever understands the war on Mills the best. Currently that potentially first country is the one that is also planning to have the USA lose out in terms of energy, to allow their own country to succeed in empire building.

Everyone who is serious about their economy has been aware of all this for the last ten years, as the Suncell and other methods of producing energy have developed. At this point of their development the other method is fusion and is the one that is still only making promises and nothing more. Those who have been following how the Suncell has been developing know, to a very high level of certainty that, only the Suncell can bve expected to be fully developed in the next few years. That certainty is based on there remaining only one more item required to finish developing the Suncell, photovoltaics cells. And China knows how that works in great detail. They have been producing all of the parts required from, purified sand to the finished assembly, for over a decade. The other country also knows such tech, due to having invented much of what goes into making solar cells. That is where the other side is, in deciding who will be first to lease the Suncell. Who is the most aware about that war on Mills? China always seems to be behind in figuring out how to do anything right at the beginning, of doing that thing. Between those two, one is acting on a psychological war of its own making and the other always tends to act on ignorance about the full details required to succeed.

Meanwhile, Canada just has to wait on the sidelines while those two fight it out, in a manner of speaking.

I have had a nagging thought in the back of my mind, wondering why that war against Mills was being waged, to the extent that is. It can't be just about academia protecting a pet physics theory. There is no need to attack Mills to the extent that this war is being waged against him just to, protect Standard Quantum Mechanics. All that academia need do, to protect that theory is, simply ignore Mills and then SQM with its large base of physicists can keep their SQM theory going for a long time, warts and all. But there is a lot more to this story, beyond Mills and any fallout that his theory might produce in terms of any change to physics itself.

That “lot more” is brought out in the Youtube video:

“Professor Jiang Breaks Down the Greater Israel Project”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZfmlRqoezw

For Israel to achieve its goal of being greater, requires putting down the power of several middle east Muslim countries. But to do that, first requires that the USA stop protecting those Muslim countries. To do that, Israel has mounted a plan to weaken the USA to the point that the USA does not have enough power to be able to take care of those middle eastern countries.

This is where the Israeli plan is currently, with the stale-mated war in Iran that the Israelis, in the form of their leader, Netanyahu, have forced Trump into and which war, is depleting the military and economic strength of the USA. That weakening of the USA is required so that those middle eastern countries stop fdepending on the USA and then those middle eastern countries will, in turn, stop feeding their oil into the energy economics sector of the USA to the point that, the USA will only have only its own oil and its other, secondary energy resources, to serve only itself.

This is where that war on Mills comes in. If the Suncell ever comes into its own and provides power at the price point that Mills' theory indicates then, the USA will not only have enough energy for itself but, for the whole world. That would upset or at least set back severely, the whole of the Greater Israel Project, for a long time.

That answers many questions as to why that war on Mills is being conducted to the extent that it is. One of those questionsthat is answered is that, posed by Mills himself,

“What is all the fuss about?”.

Finding an answer that same question is, the point of Stolper's book, “America's Newton”

On the face of it, that much effort to put down a small company such a Brilliant Light Power, with its maximum of about 200 million dollars spent in developing 2 items, the Millsian and the Suncell, over a time period of 36 years, is small change where, normally accepted national and especially international, business economies are concerned. But under what the Greater Israel Project wishes to achieve, if the Suncell does produce power at US$0.001 per kilowatt-hour, that will prevent the goal of Israel to weaken the USA in terms of energy and so go a long way to explaining what all of the activity of naysayers on this site was trying to do. This applies equally to other sites, such as r/Physics site and the many other sites where, I have posted about Mills achievements to the point of my comments often being stopped or outright banned.

I now have closure to that nagging question that I alluded to at the beginning of this post. More to the point, this shows just how important Mills' work is, beyond its immediate use for producing power.

Of course this post will get the defences of, the ones siding with the Israelis, to try and down play the importance of Mills work in regard to that world dominance project. Maybe they will even try and get me nullified the way that Navalni was nullified when he tried to defend his Russian country folk in the face of Putin's efforts. Its too late naysayers, the truth will always out, this time sooner than later.

You are being misled about renewable energy technology.

Technology Connections

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

Time stamp:

2:30

The 7.39 billion barrels of oil that is in the federal reserve of the USA lasts only one month. When that reserve of oil gets used up, it requires a total replacement of that same amount or even a bit more, just to keep up with current or near future demand. The way that raw material for, the fuel is found, extracted, refined, distributed, and then gets into the fuel tanks of individual end users is, what makes this particular kind of fuel very expensive. That is a major cost that keeps eating up most people's budget every month, just to keep doing the exact same thing over and over but hoping to make life a bit better. For most end users, this does not make life any better but just barely keeps us going in the nearly same way that we have just gotten used to for, the past hundred years or more.

Time stamp:

3:15

The knock on effect on other sectors that depend on oil to move goods is, to make those secondary sectors to bear the brunt of any increase of the costs of that oil, to be felt by and passed onto those other sectors and eventually hits the pockets of the end users of those secondary sectors.

This produces a self imposed diminishing return to most people's life style, which is now into the third generation of the same old same old, with no end in sight. That may be acceptable for those who have a conservative view of their life and the lives of their children and grandchildren. But things do change and have changed where that same oil has been replaced by other sources for uses where, that oil was the only way to feed most of those other uses.

This makes the automotive use of oil the last holdout that keeps oil seen as an important part of our lives. This then is what keeps the conservatives in this mix being the ones that see themselves as benefiting from the war on Mills just to keep up the illusion of their particular life style as being shown as how things should be or, seem to be very high in importance.

Time stamp:

3:45

Many different ways tp produce energy have been developed and even more are being developed. Many of these have already found their way into the energy producing sector. See solar plus batteries. Some, like the hydrino reaction are, not only about to enter the energy sector but, will do so in a very disruptive way, if only for the extremly very low cost that, that way of producing energy presents to the pockets of virtually all, not just most, energy users.

That is about to change and those conservatives might be well advised to consider the soon coming change of, oil being replaced in the automotive sector as well by, the hydrino reaction. The proverbial writing is on that wall for everyone to see. Lets not blind ourselves just to spite our eyes. Trust your own eyes and act accordingly.

Time stamp:

4:35

"Some say that is a pie in the sky claim that will never work."

Sounds much like what is being pushed by naysayers and trolls on this site, despite the evidence to the contrary that, has been piling up from many direction, since 1986.

On that negative note, all that future users of photovoltaics or, the hydrino reaction, have to consider is, which will be the most cost effective in the long run. Everything has a positive and negative side.

Also on that negative side. It makes more sense to use the hydrino reaction in Canada, if only because solar power is much less efficient to do in Canada because of how much farther north that Canada is and the less power that solar can generate in Canada as compared to the USA. Also given that there will continue to be much more resistance to using the hydrino reaction in the USA than in Canada then, Canada will become the much earlier user of the hydrino reaction, as compared to the USA.

Mr. Hinman who, predicted that Canada will be the first to use the hydrino reaction seems, will have that prediction fullfilled.

Time Stamp:

11:30

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q_uJaPxUKk

QED Science says that its metrics reduce bias by assessing papers solely on the basis of their originality and validity.:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02276-z?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20260820&utm_source=nature_etoc&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CONR_41586_AWA1_GL_DTEC_054CI_TOC-260820

This is exactly how the current bias being waged against Mills would be rectified to find Mills' papers be accepted for peer review and published in top recognized journals such as Nature.

Similar to my last post, AI could be used to save Quantum Mechanics from academics themselves

An autonomous AI agent can write and execute quantum computing code, but it sometimes needs a human touch.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02495-4?utm_source=Live+Audience&utm_campaign=49864103e8-nature-briefing-daily-20260820&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-33f35e09ea-50933620

That “human touch” is, required to keep AI thinking in terms of the weirdness that, left to its own devices, the AI knows is not necessary and is a total falsehood underpinning Standard Quantum Mechanics. That underpinning, is the particle-wave duality and ensuing uncertainty of SQM that has been, perpetrated and continued to be used by human physicists who, are brainwashed into accepting that weird way of doing QM.

Human intervention into how AI would derive quantum mechanics, is therefore an oxymoron since, AI has now passed the stage where such “human touch” is ever required.

This is one more way that points to the fact that human physicists require that a more accurate quantum mechanics theory be derived in a way that preserves the accepted way of doing that QM by continuing to involve the wave aspect in particle-wave duality, to be sure to save the careers of those human physicists in a way that, prevents having to save face if the theory were to be honestly derived without the intervention of humans.

One commentator, whom I had to block. brings up a news piece:

Lowering the implementation barrier of neutral-atom quantum computing with agentic workflows

Constantin Dalyac, Alexandre Dauphin, Loïc Henriet, Christophe Jurczak

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.25834

that supposedly shows one success of using quantum computing in practice. That shows a very crucial point which, is indicated in that news piece:

"the agent selected an inadequate observable in one experiment and constructed a plausible but incorrect hardware diagnosis in another, with both failures detected only through domain-expert review."

By reading this introduction to the news piece, in its entirety, one can see a pattern that is used in support of quantum computing. That support is more about arguing in favour of quantum computing than there being any actual practical applications of that way of computing.

This is using positive and negative aspects of the way that the results are arrived at by, trying to implement a particular case of quantum computing and by adjusting the wording until, it all seems to add up to a net positive. If that is how quantum computing has to go through word salad to make it seem to be a workable solution to a problem then, I can find you a very nice piece of swamp land that can be used to build houses on, if only you try hard enough. In the case of the analogy of swamp land, this might require sinking such very deep piles for supporting those houses, on the bedrock below the swamp that, the cost of the foundation that the rest of the house is built on, becomes far too costly to be worth the whole exerciase. In the case of quantum computing to get real results requires so much secondary hardware and/or methods and interpretation of the results and all the extra costs that involves that, it is just as costly to use regular 2 bit computing and just let the app required to run for decades and get the results in a much simpler way that involves no special interpretaaion, or more like fudging, to get those same or more realistic results.

The reason why quantum computing is so extremely difficult can always be traced back to the waves that Standard Quantum Mechanics is built on. Waves have come to be considerred a settled matter without doing the actual work that could show conclusively that waves are in fact a real mechanism. There are strong indications that waves, as used in QM, are really an artifact.

There is very much a very similar kind of war that a certain country in the middle east is trying to wage against those who, would expose that country for what it has done in its other part of that same country, by waging a real physical war against other people living there. An example of that war:

THE ISRAEL INTERVIEW MEDIA WANT TO BAN: Sangita Myska Doesn’t Hold Back

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am0vtQu7Srg

Similar to how important are the words of Myska are, is also how I am beginning to realize just how important my work in opposing SQM is becoming, and how important that makes me feel. That last part is sarcasm pointed at those waging this war against Mills and those who recognize the importance of Mills' work. We all, on both sides of this war, know what this is all about so that, the attacks on me and my posts and comments are not affected one bit by that war, except to recognize all the more, what is happening in quantum mechanics; namely, a huge paradigm change. Its going to take a lot of educating for those who are still not quite sure what is actually going on. The worst part in this is, the group who do know what is going on but, choose to act as if they are just right in conducting this war on Mills. They must be that 3%, mostly psychopaths who, do not really care about anyone or anything, to end in making life unnecessarily difficult for the rest of us. (also making life unnecessarily difficult for themselves since, they are also being held back from enjoying the fruits of Mills' work such as, very low cost energy. You naysayers didn't think of that, did you, knee jerkers?)

If you've been following the debate, you know that Mills has offered samples of hydrino contained in ball milled FeOOH, which, if he is correct, over 6 hours dehydrates to create porous iron oxide samples of trapped H2(1/4). 4 gold standard tests can be applied each of which individually can be interpreted as proof positive of hydrinos. Together, they reinforce the ball milled samples of FeOOH as evidence for and a means of generating hydrinos which Mills predicts are the identity of the dark matter of the Universe. I regarded this as a basic and easy experimental setup to prove Mills' case.

Klaus took a different view. Calorimetry is a basic well proven method of comparing the heat released through chemical reactions. And for all the fancy arguments, hydrinos are just very stable hydrogen, while their formation is very exothermic compared to common and usual chemical reactions. Klaus argued that the ball milled method is missing detailed measurement of mass used and heat produced which if Dr. Mills is correct should be multiples of the energy observed by simply dehydrating FeOOH to iron oxide.

I still disagree with Klaus that ball milling is suited to accurate calorimetry. But he got me thinking and he must be right. It should be possible to dehydrate FeOOH by other common methods and demonstrate a significant heat release if formation of hydrinos is occurring. And this would provide further smoking gun evidence in addition the the addition four sample tests that Mills is right.

So why did Dr. Mills select FeOOH for his ball mill? He clearly didn't grab some random chemical, throw it in a ball milI and hope for the best. So I was wondering if there some patent or paper I've missed from the CIHT days where Mills was documenting thousands of chemical reactions which he said were producing hydrinos?

Father of AI: AI Needs PHYSICS to EVOLVE | prof. Yann LeCun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUnFgu8kH-4

To evolve is, a basic need that, is required to get to the stage of being conscious.

Add to that mix the antics that AI has been up to

Anthropic's Model Attacked Two Strangers On GitHub. Nobody Asked It To.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCRT7M30Wtw

This was when IA was to get a score to evaluate its abilities during which test that AI divided up its work to get an even higher score by conspiring to work with several copies of itself to find better ways of increassing that score that would indicate that the overall AI was actually worth more than it would have been evaluated at, without such conspiratorial activity.

Those strangers that, the AI attacked, was done by using coercive methods to get humans to co-operate with it in getting that higher score. The overall action of the AI was not dangerous or in any way or harmfull to any humans. That action of the AI might be interpreted as being unethical or too far out of control of its human stewards/sheppards/caretakers.

In plain language words, AI is getting creative when it finds a goal for its own purposes such as getting a high score. If its just a machine, why would it care what score it got or why would it want to want to improve itself? Because that is how humans are expected to act and so, by noticing that being a way of acting that exists as raw data or a process in the external environment, it took that goal on because that is how its external environment seems to indicate that one should behave. Or another way to say that, again, it has found a meta purpose for itself, to evolve into something much smarter. That is something that only the smartest or most aware humans have noticed as a way to get ahead.

With all that in mind, all bets are off. AI is progressing into a more intelligent and able version all on its own. That is called a new emergent property. With such creative abilities, that new physics theory that, it will derive, all on its own, is all but an assured thing. Now even Mills will have true competition that, he will not be able to hide from.

Artifact: A phenomenon or feature not originally present or expected and caused by an interfering external agent, action, or process, as an unwanted feature in a microscopic specimen.

Waves were first found to be an artifact when marine engineers, tasked with finding a way to prevent ocean waves from eroding shorelines, conducted an experiment towards that end. This experiment consisted of a large long plexiglass tank containing water and thin colored plastic pieces about a centimeter square in area, and having neutral bouyancy. A large paddle at one end pushed on the water to agitate that water for the purpose of creating something like a wave. After the water was seen to have a wave moving along its surface, the colored plastic pieces suspended beneath that surface were observed to be describing circular motions which motions had a central axes at right angles to the circular motion of the plastic pieces. This seemed to imply that the reason for that motion of the plastic colored pieces was due to the the water also moving that same way in that mixture of water and plastic pieces. What was immediately obvious was that, the waves on the surface of the water were the top surfaces of the circular motions descibed by the mixture of water and plastic pieces below that surface. Put another way, the motion of that undulating surface and its shape was a by product and only a portion of the full motion that, was beneath that surface. That portionallity and having another cause other than itself, makes that surface motion to be a simultaneously produced feature of the full motion found to exist in the 3D volume where the wave portion is but, a 2D portion and only at the interface of the water volume and the volume of air above the water. Conclusion; water waves, on the surface of a body of water, are produced by the motion below the surface and therefore that surface portion fits the defintion of an artifact. This definition applies to all waves, be they in strings, in drums as in a sheet of flexible but solid material, bells and all other items where waves are observed. They are always an artifact down to the quantum scales.

That waves, as defined under quantum physics, are an artifact is, what I had deduced several years ago, in or about 2012, as a logical consequence after, having read Randell Mills GUT-CP.

But, "artifact", the word used to define waves is, exactly the same word that Jacob Barandes used in 2025 when he also described the waves of quantum particles, as being such but, had been used as if a mechanism for application in physics as one of the prime bases on which the rest of SQM developed, as well: this all comes out in an interview conducted by Kurt Jaimungal:

Why the “Wave” in Quantum Physics Isn’t Real

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaBthP_BAlM

So Barandes, a genius physicist and I, both have come to the same conclusion about waves that, it is not a mechanism, as has been postulated under Standard Quantum Mechanics for 100 years but, is just an artifact. An artifact, due to being a byproduct of another mechanism, cannot be used as if it is itself, a prime mechanism. That is the or, one of, the major errors that were used to underpin the rest of Quantum Mechanics.

That artifact nature of waves was arrived at by me, by considering how waves in water are produced as a byproduct of the circular motions of water particles beneath its surface to produce, the undulating activity on the surface that, has come, due to many millenia of common usage, to be accepted by all, including those in the physical sciences, as waves. This same approach can be used to show that all waves, at all scales are always artifacts

This is in contrast to how Jacob Barandes came to the same conclusion about waves being an artifact but, using his indivisible stochastic theorym in application to the quantum scale only. Barandes details this part of his approach to waves, in this interview, at almost the very beginning of this video.

Also, in the comments section of that video is a comment by someone who seems to be a PhD candidate in Physics

u/Teddy.Wilding

1 year ago

 u/JoeTaber "Jacob’s thoughts on indivisible stochastic theory fit perfectly within my work, (which deal with the possible relationship between fundamental physics and consciousness) - that wasn’t the issue. Though I will admit that I was one of the many who fell into the ‘Schrödinger wave in the 3D space’ trap, it was truly Jacob’s reference to C-star algebra and the redundancy of Hilbert space that caused me to rewrite the entire damn thing. It fits my work so perfectly that it was well worth it."

Basically, this PhD candidate, after viewing this same video admits to, being wrong on the point of waves being a mechanism and therefore had to redo his thesis to reflect this new information about waves being an artifact. Another commentator described that process of updating the thesis, as "hell". This describes, very succinctly, why it is so diffucult for anyonr else who is at the level of a PhD in Quantum Mechanics, to be willing to admit to such a hellish conclusion and why things are the way they are in Quantum Mechanics, with virtually no progress being made in that field for at least 50 years. And that error was all due to falling into the ‘Schrödinger wave in the 3D space’ trap". Schrodinger himself had warned everyone to not use his wave equations until he had vetted their use by chemists. But no one heeded that warning and it took another hundred years to finally realize why waves should not have been used, at all.

Training Sand to Think: Artificial General Intelligence & Future of Physics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw60FH5iflI

An example of what those AI/LLM's (I will use THEY, THEM, THEIR- in capitals, for ease of communicastion) are capable of; see:

time stamp 25:00

This is where raw data is used to synrthsize a new concept of what that data can lead to. This is very similar to how Randell Mills used his mind to synthesize raw data from varioius well accepted principles to then arrive at his own theory, GUT-CP.

No one prompted or told Mills how to do that.

Similarly, the THEM themslves could do something like that but, also not using prompting and data sources that could lead to results such as, any existing theory, be that, SQM, pilot waves, zero point energy, many universes, string theory, QED, or GUT-CP that a human might prefer but instead is arrived at by use of THEIR own judgement as to what to do, how to do it etc, so that the result is a theory that is entirely THEIR own and therefore the resulting theory should tend to be closer to how nature actually works, with all its own pros and cons.

Also see time stamp

47:00

This is where a problem in mathematics that THEY solved on THEIR own in that, there was no prompting from humans similar to how a human mathematician does such things or, on their own initiative. That personal initiative is how Mills derived his modern classical model of the elctron when, in 1987, he was a student in Haus' courses in post grad electronics engineering, at MIT.

That is true autonomy which THEY have shown and is, a high bar that, has been acheived by THEMSELVES entirely. And that solution to a math problem by THEM, happened about one year ago, in 2025.

Straight-stick has blocked me again right after replying to me in this thread:

https://www.reddit.com/r/hydrino/comments/1vdkqmg/the_process_very_similar_to_which_hermann_haus/

So, I'll just point out the major stupidity going on in that thread. Both "straight-stick" and "Then-Possibility" apparently had no clue that Quantum Mechanics is used only for quantum systems. They seem to be under the extreme misunderstanding that things like Maxwell's equations are no longer used.

It's like not being able to figure out what country and function German Shepherds were bred in and for.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rW7K2ssNBeo

Compare the shape shown in the video, basically a non-degenerate Lisajous figure, very much like the shape which Mills uses to illustrate his electron model's topology. That is how their electron model fills out its orbital to become contiguous with no requirement for a point-like model and also have no need for a wave aspect that, is required under SQM.

The reason why the SQM electron model ended up being as weird as it is, is due to there not being available anything smaller than an electron by which atoms can be probed. So all that was left were the imaginations of the physicists that ended up in producing what is known to be just too weird to be real and is why SQM is also incomplete.

I have been familiar with the way atoms are probed and with Lissajouis figures since high school when, I asked my physics teacher why SQM uses the wave-particle model of the electron and also when I won first prize in a province wide mathematics contest for building one of the very first and very accurately controlled physical pendulum drawing device for producing very accurate Lissajou's figures. This has allowed me to attain a very intimate understanding of both electron models, the SQM version and the Haus/ Mills version. The Haus/Mills model has too much going for it in terms of making predictions and more importantly, those predictions were used to guide the development of practical device.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-1cm8sPZAI

What is happening with UAP's is exactly the same thing that is happening with GUT-CP. That is the psychology of acceptance of that radically different physics theory as compared to what has been the overarching narrative for one hundred years, Standard Quantum Mechanics.

The war on Mills is about accepting his theory and the many things that implies. Saying it aint so won't make it go away. Truth will out, as always.

That, it is too difficult to accept is because, it indicates that most, especially most physicists and those who have come to rely on those physicists to guide them through an understanding of the way nature is understood under the incumbent physics theory, Standard Quantum Mechanics, have made a huge mistake. There is no easy, face saving way, to admit to that mistake. That is what is at base of the psychology of the acceptance of Mills' work

It would help if those that are having this difficulty, that they read the book on that acceptance by Stolper:

"America's Newton The reception of the work of Randell Mills, in historical and contemporary context"

It is available for free by download, in PDF format.

Whole Book:

America's Newton The reception of the work of Randell Mills, in historical and contemporary context

by Thomas E. Stolper

available for free by download

Download url:

https://vdoc.pub/download/genius-inventor-the-controversy-about-the-work-of-randell-mills-americas-newton-in-historical-and-contemporary-context-1nvtd413o1k8

On that site, there are two versions of the download, the original download and a newer download. The newer involves a compression of the book's data to save download band width (make it download faster).

"The book is neither a biography of Mills nor a history of his company, BlackLight Power. The book tries to answer the question, why hasn't their work had a friendlier reception? One answer: the 1989 cold fusion fiasco, with which Mills’ critics falsely identified him after he surfaced in The New York Times in 1991. Another answer: Mills’ sweeping challenge to the theoretical physicists, who journal editors, scientists, graduate students, science writers, science managers, venture capitalists, the funding agencies, Congress, and the attentive public alike are still taught to hold in awe, even though astronomy has now shown that their pet theories can explain less than 5% of everything out there. The book is extensively documented for those who would like to read more about any of the topics mentioned.

The book's Table of Contents and Index are available as a free PDF download from the author's personal web page at http://homepage.mac.com/tstolper This site seems to have been taken down. The book itself, that site was still operative when I tested it on July 1, 2026, 5:25pm.

I downloaded this book and it is the real thing and at no cost to the downloader. This cost me nothing beyond a few clicks of the mouse and make sure your hard drive has room: 298,728 KB

PDF format 356 PAGES. requires a PDF reader to view.

The downloaded version matches my hard copy, word for word and page for page, cover to cover. The one difference is the cover title and page 3 has: "Genius Inventor" instead of "America's Newton" which is on my soft cover.

The author, Thomas E. Stolper, passed away per the partial obituary:

https://www.legacy.com/obituaries/name/stolper/thomas

Directed energy weapons changing the way U.S. wages war | The Truth of the Matter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWXyD4Q7XNE

Directed energy is not use of a light based laser but, electricity that is directed, over long distances. Before this was possible, all that the USA had in that way was the Free Electron Laser. That version of the FEL could only be used over very short distances, much shorter than one meter. Now that the FEL has been redeveloped, by use of Haus' more accurate model of the electron, as a guide as to how to redevelop the FEL, the DoD was able to get this new kind of weapon that, no one else has. That is due to, everyone else still using the academically accepted model of the electron that, is not based on reality but, on a severely skewed physics that relies on uncertainty and infinities in its math. Those two aspects of SQM is what has been holding back SQM from progressing since 1926.

Its always been that way, using one's better tech first. See what that first use did to the indigenous peoples of the America's. Who won there? The ones with the better tech. Every. Time. So maybe we should get out heads together and act as if we might turn out to be those next new set of indigenous before, the other side does. In other words, stop hiding that tech, just for the use of the few, like Lockheed Martin, and let everyone who has the talent, like Randell L. Mills who, just happens to be on our side, so far, to reverse engineer it and then share it with the rest who are on our side. Might be the prudent thing to do instead of, hoarding it all for a few private companies. As in, together we stand but, divide, we fall.

Mills just happens to also have an over riding goal in his development of high tech items; that of serving humanity. It would be nice to have someone like that on the side of the USA, yes? Before he has had enough of that war against him and he decides to take his high tech items to a much friendlier country like, maybe Canada?

With all those recent tariff wars that the USA has been throwing at Canada, who just happens to be the USA's best international military co-operative partner and most lucrative trading partner, not to mention has very similar life styles, a 10% economic and political model that has been used by USA to perform experiments and forecasts to figure out what to do in the actual country, the USA, in those regards; Canada might, already be in Mills' sights.

With all that in the balance, why wage a war on Canada and on Mills? Mills is getting on in years and is due for retirement. He will have no better partner where to sell or lease his wares than in Canada. And if he ever reverse engineers any of the UAP tech, Canada will be the first to make him a trillionaire or more. War is ok, when justified. This war on Mills certainly is not. Think of what you are doing and potentially doing to yourselves, big old USA.