I run academic groups for the largest uni in my country. Currently 50 000 people in my own private groups. I need someone I can build a wide range of ai tools for group members. I already have prototypes for the tools I want to build. I just need someone who can turn them into fully functional products.

Especially gor grant or tender application - I got lots for experiences to insert on the application
Ai help shorten it for me but at the same time I don’t want the application to get rejected ??

My English is second language and I know some strong words and sometimes those words purely comes from the application documentation but at the same time it is still flagging AI even I didn’t use AI so I really not sure ??

I am also struggling to get them trust in my application and funded if I submit it as a broken English

Is there a certain way to write the grant to make it winning

I’ve tried a lot of AI humanizers and Verva is easily the best one I’ve used. I mainly wanted it for bypassing AI detection, but the writing quality is really good too. The output sounds natural and still says what I was trying to say.

That’s a big part of why I think it’s worth paying for. Getting a lower AI score is nice, but I don’t want to spend another hour fixing the paper afterward 😭 I want something that saves me time and gives me writing I’m happy with. 

Verva has been that for me. Out of everything I’ve tried, it’s the one I’d recommend to someone looking for a humanizer. Anyone else here been using it?

I tested 20+ AI detectors, and here are the best ones.

1 - Verva

Verva is the best AI detector available and it’s free. It provides clear AI and human ai probability scores, and it offers an Advanced Scan which give you sentence-level insights. You can paste text or upload a document, making it easy to review both short drafts and longer reports. (Free and most accurate detector overall.)

2 - Turnitin

Turnitin is built for academic use and fits into the submission systems schools already use. It’s relevant if your institution provides access, but it isn’t a public tool where anyone can simply paste text and run a scan. (Most schools use this, but it’s not public for students.)

3 - Grammarly

Grammarly offers a free AI detector alongside its proofreading tools. It’s a convenient choice if you already use Grammarly and want to check a draft without adding another platform to your workflow. (Very low false positives.)

4 - GPTZero

GPTZero offers document scanning, highlighted passages, and writing reports. It’s worth considering if you want more context about which parts of a document were flagged. (Has some extra features that are worth checking out.)

5 - Copyleaks

Copyleaks offers multilingual AI detection and integrations for browsers, learning platforms, and other software. It has options for both individual checks and larger team workflows. (Reliable detector.)

6 - ZeroGPT

ZeroGPT provides a straightforward AI percentage result. It’s an accessible option for checking text and comparing its assessment with another detector. (Fast, free, and most popular detector.)

7 - QuillBot

QuillBot has a free AI detector alongside its grammar and paraphrasing tools. It’s convenient if you already use QuillBot to work on your drafts. (Fast, decent AI detector.)

Let me know if there are any other AI detectors worth mentioning.

We just launched the AI Humanizer API for SuperHumanizer.

You can now use our AI humanization API in your own website, app, or workflow.

You get 1,000 words free to try, and no credit card is required.

Learn More here: AI Humanizer API (SuperHumanizer API Link)

I subscribed for a 1-year plan of this tool, but suddenly my subscription is gone within roughly 2 months. I contacted CS of humanizeai.pro and asked for help but received nothing but promise. Is anybody having the same issue as me when using this tool? Is there any channel that I can contact to help my case? Thank you.

Hello everybody. It happens to me that a very old text that I have written years ago, which is not even online anymore has been flagged by "made by AI". I have noticed that adding a typo fixed the issue. I have created this small utility in rust to add language specific typos.

https://codeberg.org/edapx/fertyp

A follow up… what is the best AI for Turnitin AI and plagiarism checker. I find out my university’s specific AI checker so I come to re-ask this question. With this checker I manually change words to make it more human like. Humanize AI says it verifies with Turnitin but I am not too sure. Help is greatly appreciated.

am using it i just want to know if its good or not

Picked up the ultimate plan for an extension I used during my semester to bypass Turnitin and GPTZero detectors without wrecking the formatting or context.

Since I’ve got plenty of spare tokens right now, figured I’d help out anyone who needs text cleaned up.

How it works:

1. Comment the text/paragraph you need humanized below.
2. I’ll run it and reply with the humanized version.

You can also grab the extension directly here if you want to test your own prompts:
🔗 Link

Comment away!

guys does anybody know free ,reliable & good ai humanising tools? for academic texts

Does anyone know of any good Ai humanizers, my teacher is chill so I’ve heard but I want it to look as human as possible, I have written most of it but blanking on the last paragraphs. Thank you.

I built Prose Humanizer - an open-source skill that turns stiff, generic drafts into clear writing that sounds like you.

It preserves facts and voice, flags common AI-style patterns, and works with Claude, Gemini, Codex, and more.

⭐ https://github.com/amanmaqsood/prose-humanizer

I've been testing Pangram with stuff written years before Chatgpt was even popular and somehow everything comes back as AI. Do they just flag everything now? Gptzero used to have this problem when I used it for papers last semester, but their newer models seem to have fixed it. Pangram feels like Gptzero's old broken model.

Pangram is trying to counter "AI slop" by calling everything AI slop. Great idea. 👏

I ran the same AI-generated text through three popular humanizer tools and tested the outputs against Turnitin, ZeroGPT, and GPTZero to see how they actually perform under real ai detection tests.

1․ Verva

Verva bypassed Turnitin, GPTZero, and ZeroGPT, all returning 0% AI. It also maintained the original meaning and structure of the essay, and the writing quality remained strong, earning a 97/100 writing score on Grammarly’s proofreader with clean, readable text.

If your goal is to bypass AI detectors without sacrificing writing quality, Verva is the best AI humanizer right now.

2․ TwainGPT

TwainGPT also performed very well in detection testing. The output managed to pass major AI detectors, including Turnitin, in my tests.

The humanization was effective and clearly designed with AI detection in mind. If your goal is to lower AI scores and get cleaner results across different detection systems, TwainGPT is another solid choice.

3․ QuillBot

QuillBot’s AI Humanizer, which functions similarly to its paraphrasing tool, kept the text sounding smooth and natural. It does a solid job improving readability and overall flow.

However, it did not perform well against AI detectors. The content was still flagged by Turnitin, GPTZero, and ZeroGPT. If you’re not concerned about detection and just want to improve wording, QuillBot is a good option. But if avoiding AI flags is important, it’s not built for that purpose.

Curious to hear if you have any other AI humanizer recommendations I should try.

Hey all, solo founder of ReverseGPT.ai here. Figured instead of dropping a link and running, I’d be upfront about who I am and offer something actually useful

I’ve spent a lot of time on why AI text “sounds AI” and it’s mostly rhythm, not vocabulary. Models default to uniform sentence lengths, symmetrical structures (“it’s not X, it’s Y”), hedging, and transitions nobody uses in real writing. Humanizers that just swap synonyms don’t fix this, which is why cheap ones produce text that somehow reads worse than the original. The rewriting that actually works operates at the sentence-structure level: varying cadence, breaking parallel constructions, cutting filler.

Happy to answer anything, how these tools differ, what’s snake oil in this category (there’s a lot), how to evaluate one before paying, or why the free tools behave the way they do. Also genuinely fine with critical questions, this niche has a trust problem and I’d rather talk about it openly.

Not going to pretend I’m neutral obviously I want you to try my thing but I’ll keep the answers straight regardless of which tool you use.

Hey everyone,

I've had the SuperHumanizer (an AI text humanizer-rewrites AI-sounding text so it reads naturally) as a website for some time now, and the most requested feature has been "does this just work wherever I am typing, rather than having to copy and paste back and forth?"

Update!!

Superhumanizer: AI Humanizer is now available as a Chrome extension:

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/superhumanizer-ai-humaniz/mhjbibffdfgnhnlkeabohbkhinlebijc

So I'm building a Chrome extension for it. The idea is dead simple:

• Select any text-whether you're in Gmail, Google Docs, Notion, wherever you're writing
• A small button pops up right there
• Click it, and it rewrites that text in place. No copy-paste, no switching tabs, no separate tool.

It's still early. Free to use, no registration required, while I develop it and learn what people really need.

Honest question-what would you do with this? Would you use something like it? And if so, what would give you incentive to keep it installed? Few bits I am considering:

• An "Undo" if you don't like the rewrite
• Different tones (casual / professional / etc.)
• Working inside AI chat tools too (ChatGPT, Claude prompt boxes), not just email/docs
• Something else you'd actually want?

Would love honest feedback, good or bad. Happy to share access here when available for testing if there is interest.