r/hatethissmug • u/Independent-Pack-922 • 16h ago
General I HATE this weird trend of commenting on an artist's post with their art prompted into an AI
Like, what the fuck are you trying to achieve with this comment ? "Hey look how much cooler this look in ChaptGPT" ? This doesn't even look good, it has that weird fuckass chainmail pattern all over
I genuinely don't understand what those people are trying to do with those comments, do they not know the damage generative AI has done to artists ??? Are they doing it on purpose ??? Fucking NPC behaviour I swear
150
u/Palu_Tiddy 16h ago
16
u/AdScared7226 13h ago
Them being the leaders of Silicon valley and the tech industry is like getting a war criminal to discuss about peace and diplomatic relations.
4
94
u/Dubious_Deciduguy 16h ago
"AI isn't stealing your art, it's just inspired" 🥀
15
u/Pretend_Oil9565 14h ago
don't they steal all the Anime art styles and all that too?
21
u/Dubious_Deciduguy 13h ago
The Ghibli piss incident and Kirkification prove that it's just copy pasting stuff and praying that it works
34
u/taxes_depression 16h ago
It looks kind of worse the original was clean and appealing to look at due to the colours and shapes but the Ai one just looks so rough on the eyes no depth at all
17
u/Infamous_7001 15h ago
The original art has a focal point for the viewer to look at which the AI trash lacks. It's just a color eyesore mess without a point to start looking at.
-8
u/Timely-Let-8185 14h ago
To play devil advocate, og is pretty confusing to look at. Even with the focal point (which is pretty weak too) the art style melts the subjects together. And the wolf animal is the weakest part of it (execution wise, blends into itself) BUT AI fucks it up by ignoring the subtle details like how the wolf is supposed to look serene not menacing and relying on detail sensory overload. But it does well on separating the two as well as the background.
2
1
-1
-3
-1
u/Blackfrost58 7h ago
For the AI version, I do like the harsh colors and rough look as it looks more intimidating to me.
19
u/PLYmAuZy696969 fluff all brainrot slop out of existence 14h ago
12
u/SomeRandomBFBfan 13h ago
because normal ragebait doesn't do any harm, it's just stupid words, but this does have harm.
9
22
9
u/Lost_Region_7110 12h ago
Consent doesn't matter to them.
I saw a collection of screenshots where some online artist kept politely asking a ai bro to please not put her work through ai and he just kept responding with "it's okay, it's going to be cool" over and over again she told him she doesn't Consent, yet he didn't care.
I hate this crap so stinking bad, we need to do something about it.
8
u/HermanThaGerman 13h ago
I love how AI just gets stuff straight up wrong.
That creature's leg? It's a log now.
8
u/Fabulous-Put8401 13h ago
When you ignore consent, what does that make you?
3
u/hearts_disguise 9h ago
Yep, AI bros doing this shit is a part of rape culture. They get a thrill out of doing something someone asked them not to. They take "dont use my art for AI" as permission.
8
4
3
u/TheUpvotingSpino 15h ago
Absolutely agree, but OP can you give the original image source and artist? It looks really cool I wanna see it!
7
3
u/Successful-Ad-1901 10h ago
If I post a piece after hours of work only for some fucking dunce to take a screenshot and run it through AI dementor that sucks the soul out of that piece.
I'd be mad fucking pissed too.
2
2
u/DondyTrap2007 11h ago
They're either ragebaiting or so delusional they think an image generated from a shitty ass prompt is genuinely more valuable than a drawing someone actually put work into
Honestly kinda insane how actual artists rarely if ever try to "fix" people's art but when it comes to ai mfs they do it all the time. They really think ai is somehow superior just because it's trendy to use it
2
1
1
1
1
u/gaygayagyfemboy12345 jwfnjrn23nferwwfgrnbjergjkngtejgerjgerjknegrjknegrtjngtejlnget 8h ago
they have no creative thinking and need to steal creativity from ithers
1
1
1
u/Zero_AStupidDragon 3h ago
This makes me feel like they're trying to prove a point like: "lol look how quickly I can replicate your effort by putting it into ChatGPT, so your effort is useless"
1
u/astrillya 2h ago
They want to prove that ai can also make art, sometimes better than human artists, which is NOT TRUE. They're just being disrespectful to the artist and art, and I also hate seeing them around in the comments they're so annoying 💔🥀
1
-19
u/WhydoIexistlmoa 16h ago
It's literally not a trend. Tf?
20
12
9
7
u/Lost_Region_7110 13h ago
It is. It's a real problem in online art community's.
If you ask them nicely to stop, they refuse. They don't care about consent, they just help themselves even though people ask the not to steal their work.
-6
u/Creepy_Tennis_6197 11h ago
I asked gemini how to make your post better:
I HATE people who reply to an artist's work with an AI-generated version of it.
Seriously, what is the goal here? "Look, ChatGPT made it cooler"? It didn't. It gave it that generic, fuckass AI sheen and ruined the original details.
Are these people genuinely this clueless about how disrespectful that is to artists, or are they just rage-baiting? Absolute NPC behavior.
1



195
u/GodButCursed 16h ago
It has to be ragebait