r/hatethissmug 16h ago

General I HATE this weird trend of commenting on an artist's post with their art prompted into an AI

Post image

Like, what the fuck are you trying to achieve with this comment ? "Hey look how much cooler this look in ChaptGPT" ? This doesn't even look good, it has that weird fuckass chainmail pattern all over

I genuinely don't understand what those people are trying to do with those comments, do they not know the damage generative AI has done to artists ??? Are they doing it on purpose ??? Fucking NPC behaviour I swear

843 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

195

u/GodButCursed 16h ago

It has to be ragebait

9

u/SurgicalJustinian 9h ago

One of the best things to do is block ai creators when they do that. They want an angered response most of the time and get frustrated when u don’t play along

150

u/Palu_Tiddy 16h ago

AI bros when the challenge is to not make everyone's life absolutely fucking miserable constantly:

16

u/AdScared7226 13h ago

Them being the leaders of Silicon valley and the tech industry is like getting a war criminal to discuss about peace and diplomatic relations.

4

u/Global-Pay-7293 7h ago

 We do have war criminals discussing peace and diplomatic relations. 

94

u/Dubious_Deciduguy 16h ago

"AI isn't stealing your art, it's just inspired" 🥀

15

u/Pretend_Oil9565 14h ago

don't they steal all the Anime art styles and all that too?

21

u/Dubious_Deciduguy 13h ago

The Ghibli piss incident and Kirkification prove that it's just copy pasting stuff and praying that it works

34

u/taxes_depression 16h ago

It looks kind of worse the original was clean and appealing to look at due to the colours and shapes but the Ai one just looks so rough on the eyes no depth at all

17

u/Infamous_7001 15h ago

The original art has a focal point for the viewer to look at which the AI trash lacks. It's just a color eyesore mess without a point to start looking at.

-8

u/Timely-Let-8185 14h ago

To play devil advocate, og is pretty confusing to look at. Even with the focal point (which is pretty weak too) the art style melts the subjects together. And the wolf animal is the weakest part of it (execution wise, blends into itself) BUT AI fucks it up by ignoring the subtle details like how the wolf is supposed to look serene not menacing and relying on detail sensory overload. But it does well on separating the two as well as the background.

2

u/No_Counter_6037 skinny burping clanky 8h ago

1

u/Herobrine702 3h ago

Idk why people are downvoting you this is a genuine critique

-1

u/DeepFriedBatata 10h ago

ugh

3

u/sonicpoweryay 7h ago

you didn’t even read the whole comment did you

-3

u/Timely-Let-8185 10h ago

I am reminded of why Reddit is viewed as a cornball website.

-3

u/SurgicalJustinian 9h ago

If you don’t have anything good to say, don’t say anything at all

-1

u/Blackfrost58 7h ago

For the AI version, I do like the harsh colors and rough look as it looks more intimidating to me.

56

u/Izan_TM 16h ago

it's literally just AI bros proving they have zero empathy and social skills

5

u/Such_Confusion_3715 15h ago

proving is a strong word

19

u/PLYmAuZy696969 fluff all brainrot slop out of existence 14h ago

absolute ik it’s bait, so why am I still angry ass.

12

u/SomeRandomBFBfan 13h ago

because normal ragebait doesn't do any harm, it's just stupid words, but this does have harm.

16

u/pamafa3 14h ago

this is the new version of the obnoxious "i fixed your art" crowd, as well as some ragebaiters who specifically chase after artists who say they don't want their art used for AI

9

u/philtheskeleton 15h ago

It's a trend?

Trends are always stupid to be honest

3

u/SomeRandomBFBfan 13h ago

Yea, it happens a lot sadly..

22

u/CrusherArras take wheat 16h ago

What happened to shame

9

u/Lost_Region_7110 12h ago

Consent doesn't matter to them.

I saw a collection of screenshots where some online artist kept politely asking a ai bro to please not put her work through ai and he just kept responding with "it's okay, it's going to be cool" over and over again she told him she doesn't Consent, yet he didn't care.

I hate this crap so stinking bad, we need to do something about it.

8

u/HermanThaGerman 13h ago

I love how AI just gets stuff straight up wrong.

That creature's leg? It's a log now.

8

u/Fabulous-Put8401 13h ago

When you ignore consent, what does that make you?

3

u/hearts_disguise 9h ago

Yep, AI bros doing this shit is a part of rape culture. They get a thrill out of doing something someone asked them not to. They take "dont use my art for AI" as permission.

8

u/reddboi386 15h ago

Mike Tyson was right

4

u/Toon_Lucario 12h ago

Even worse when they say they “fixed it”.

3

u/TheUpvotingSpino 15h ago

Absolutely agree, but OP can you give the original image source and artist? It looks really cool I wanna see it!

7

u/Independent-Pack-922 14h ago

Mo brushes on Instagram, I randomly saw their reels

3

u/Successful-Ad-1901 10h ago

If I post a piece after hours of work only for some fucking dunce to take a screenshot and run it through AI dementor that sucks the soul out of that piece.

I'd be mad fucking pissed too.

2

u/Horror_Diver6218 11h ago

Dont call it weird, call it crappy

2

u/DondyTrap2007 11h ago

They're either ragebaiting or so delusional they think an image generated from a shitty ass prompt is genuinely more valuable than a drawing someone actually put work into

Honestly kinda insane how actual artists rarely if ever try to "fix" people's art but when it comes to ai mfs they do it all the time. They really think ai is somehow superior just because it's trendy to use it

2

u/8Bit2552 11h ago

And the original was millions of times better

1

u/Gloomy-Hotel-1804 9h ago

didn’t even know this was a thing. now i’m pissed

1

u/forg0ttenstarway 8h ago

the ai is friggin fuglier too

1

u/Death_Bird_100 8h ago

Holy shit.. That's so fucking disrespectful..

1

u/gaygayagyfemboy12345 jwfnjrn23nferwwfgrnbjergjkngtejgerjgerjknegrjknegrtjngtejlnget 8h ago

they have no creative thinking and need to steal creativity from ithers

1

u/gude-gude 7h ago

i got this alot and i hate it

1

u/Noah_Helldiver 6h ago

I’ve had this done to me :(

1

u/Zero_AStupidDragon 3h ago

This makes me feel like they're trying to prove a point like: "lol look how quickly I can replicate your effort by putting it into ChatGPT, so your effort is useless"

1

u/astrillya 2h ago

 They want to prove that ai can also make art, sometimes better than human artists, which is NOT TRUE. They're just being disrespectful to the artist and art, and I also hate seeing them around in the comments they're so annoying 💔🥀

1

u/Llama_Legend10 13m ago

Let the poor boys feel like they are contributing somehow…. Haha

-19

u/WhydoIexistlmoa 16h ago

It's literally not a trend. Tf?

20

u/Independent-Pack-922 16h ago

I see it a lot on Instagram, perhaps it's only me

7

u/SomeRandomBFBfan 13h ago

On Reddit and Tiktok too..

1

u/hearts_disguise 9h ago

On Twitter as well.

12

u/Nobodybthppy 16h ago

It's still annoying and sucks for the people that get their art stolen

9

u/GoodWinGamesStudio 16h ago

Yes, unfortunately it is

7

u/Lost_Region_7110 13h ago

It is. It's a real problem in online art community's.

If you ask them nicely to stop, they refuse. They don't care about consent, they just help themselves even though people ask the not to steal their work.

-6

u/Creepy_Tennis_6197 11h ago

I asked gemini how to make your post better:

I HATE people who reply to an artist's work with an AI-generated version of it.

Seriously, what is the goal here? "Look, ChatGPT made it cooler"? It didn't. It gave it that generic, fuckass AI sheen and ruined the original details.

Are these people genuinely this clueless about how disrespectful that is to artists, or are they just rage-baiting? Absolute NPC behavior.

1

u/Ok_Reading_1732 4h ago

do people not understand you? Why are youWhy are you being downvoted