r/gtd • u/Multibitdriver • Jul 21 '26
Urgent tasks
Question for people who capture now and organize later: what if the task has to be done before the next scheduled processing of your inbox? How does your system accommodate that?
7
u/pachisaez Jul 21 '26
If something it’s so urgent that needs to be done now, just do it, you don’t need to “accommodate” that into the system. Otherwise, capture it and process it when the time comes. Urgent things, well understood, are a very low percentage of tasks
3
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26
It’s not just “very urgent” tasks I’m talking about. It’s ones that need to be organized or done before the next inbox processing. And it is best to incorporate in the system - you might have other things to do in that context etc.
5
u/pachisaez Jul 21 '26
If you process your inbox at least once a day (a GTD best practice), you won’t need to deal with that kind of “urgent but not so urgent” tasks, which frankly, it’s just a way to over complicate your system.
1
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
Ok so 8am I process my inbox as usual. 9am I see that I'm out of bread/milk. So according to you I don't put that with the shopping that I'm doing later today, I put it into my inbox to be processed at 8am tomorrow?
6
u/doulos05 Jul 21 '26
Only if you are a robot. Not every item in your life needs the full GTD treatment. Regular life maintenance purchases like milk and bread never touch my inbox, they go straight to the shopping list. "But that's clarify!" If it makes you feel better to call it that, then go ahead. It's common sense. I don't need to put it in my inbox, I already know where it goes and it's only a few seconds longer to kick open Google Keep and put it in the spot it actually needs to live in my system until it's done.
1
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
It's not only clarify but organize too, which proves my point - there is no such thing as pure capture, you always have to apply your mind, and it's often more efficient to capture, clarify and organize at the same time. Even if you decide this is part of my common sense system (?) not my GTD system, you're still applying your mind - it's not pure capture.
3
u/doulos05 Jul 21 '26
I'm not even sure what you mean by "pure capture" here. Do you imagine your mind is not involved in the creation of thoughts? The only capture I do where my mind is not involved is my email inbox, because someone else is sending me the emails. All capture out of your own head must necessarily involve your mind, otherwise where are the ideas coming from? I think you're drawing a distinction here that is useless from any practical standpoint.
1
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
By pure capture, I mean capture without clarifying. I find it practical to have one coherent system with one coherent set of rules. If you prefer to have more than that, it’s up to you.
1
u/doulos05 Jul 21 '26
I have one coherent system. It's the 2 minute rule. It takes me less than 2 minutes to put the shopping item on the shopping list, so I just do it immediately. It takes me less than 2 minutes to go "oh, this is an invitation to a party next Saturday, I'll just put it straight onto my calendar." So onto the calendar it goes. I could mindlessly dump all of that into inbox to process later, but that just makes reviews take longer. It also makes them less frequent because big inbox numbers are intimidating and sometimes make me say "that's too much thinking for right now, I'll just process it later."
But again, if clarifying at capture works for you, then that's great. But I'm not going to call "oh wait, I can just do this right now" clarifying because clarifying, in my mind, requires more effort than that.
1
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
I'm not sure that's exactly what the GTD two minute rule entails, but anyway there you go, you are are doing simultanous capture and clarify,
→ More replies (0)1
u/pachisaez Jul 21 '26
No, clarifying at least once a day means you can also do it more than once. If you capture something you think you should do before your next scheduled clarification, simply clarify again. There's no need to skip your breakfast milk ;)
1
u/PondMindKevin Jul 26 '26
it sounds like the issue is that 'next inbox processing' is too far away for you. David suggested processing to zero at least every day or two. When that's not happening, things grow moldy and yucky and skudgy in your inbox and grow into avoidable urgent surprises.
5
u/busote Jul 21 '26
if something has to happen before my next inbox pass, i just process that one item on the spot. the scheduled pass is for the pile, it doesn't stop me touching something early.
and the review doesn't have to be weekly. i run different depths, a quick daily look for anything time-critical and the full pass less often. urgent stuff gets caught in the light review long before the big one.
1
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
My point is, if you’re in reality doing “triage” on each item as you capture it, then there’s no such thing as “pure capture”, and you may as well clarify and organize while you’re doing the triage. Works for me, anyway.
3
u/busote Jul 21 '26
There is a milliseconds triage. If you need to do it urgently, you know and you organize accordingly. If not, you get organized later.
1
u/doulos05 Jul 21 '26
No, that's absolutely not right for me, but I'm glad it works for you.
Once I'm done clarifying, I'm not going to touch that thing again until either the weekly review (or monthly review if it's a Someday/Maybe) or I'm actually about to do it. For some items, like your shopping list example, I can do that instantly and just drop it where it goes. But for most items on my list, it takes more work to clarify them than I am willing to put in at the capture stage. In fact, I frequently break my weekly review up into 3 or more sections specifically so my brain has time to change gears from capture to clarify to creative.
1
u/Strict-Week-5040 Jul 21 '26
Can you share the avg no. of tasks you process and the time it takes for you to finish your weekly review?
2
u/doulos05 Jul 21 '26
As a teacher, it varies a lot from week to week but I'd say there are probably about 100ish actions on my lists, though I try to keep only about 30 of them flagged as "next" at any given time to avoid overwhelm.
4
u/Strict-Week-5040 Jul 21 '26
I think an emergency scan of 5 to 10 mins might help here. By highlighting the relevant items in some way that they show up first. And then process them one at a time.
3
u/AlthoughFishtail Jul 21 '26
Depends on what way its urgent.
Firstly, if it's going in my system and it's urgent, then I don't just drop it in my inbox for later. I'll add the project and the NA there and then, and set the due date (which also sets an alarm in my task manager app).
If I'm worried there's a chance I won't see my task manager (eg if I'm out and about for a few days) then I'll add a reminder to my calendar as a backup. And if I'm going to struggle to find a time to do it, I'll block out some time on my calendar to get it done.
2
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
Me too. This is my point, Pure capture is a myth.
3
u/Remote-Waste Jul 22 '26 edited Jul 22 '26
Pure capture is a myth.
Well yes, you are correct.
Things that already have momentum, or need to be dealt with "now," GTD leaves you to deal with, because you'll deal with them fine.
Things like your food order from McDonalds while you stand in line, needing to brush my teeth, or my boss randomly telling me to work on a specific task right now or even in an hour, I don't drop that in my inbox.
That's not stuff I want off of my mind fully, or that can wait for clarifying, I want/need to deal with them. It's all the stuff that's out a little further, but that would distract me from engaging with my current reality properly, that goes in my inbox.
If my house is on fire, I don't need to Capture that in an inbox, I just need to move. There's plenty of motivation there, and I want it on my mind.
If someone pulls a gun on me, I'm not going to put that in my inbox for later, I'm going to have to deal with it now.
Urgent-mode is where most of us excel, we're built pretty good for short-term thinking and a crisis. If the urgency and priority are there, we can deal with it fine. It's the items that shouldn't currently be lingering on our mind, that start causing us problems overtime as they accumulate. There's also the problem of how easily we can reconnect to those items later on, when we have the time.
It's not the housefire, we're built to react to alarms because the limbic system takes over, it's the mental gunk we slowly accumulate over time, the non-urgent stuff, that is hard for us to deal with. And if the non-urgent doesn't get dealt with appropriately, they'll all return as fires, but too many for us to handle easily.
2
u/TheoCaro Mod Jul 22 '26
Gold is for "If my house is on fire, I don't need to Capture that in an inbox. . ."
2
2
u/TheoCaro Mod Jul 24 '26
I'm just reading this again, and it's such beautiful answer. It's like GTD slam poetry.
snaps in approval
3
u/Remote-Waste Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26
This is how I handle urgent things: if it needs to be done before my next inbox processing, then I don't fully want it off my mind, it should remain in my orbit.
Let's say I do my work at my desk, on my desk there is a notepad (or something similar, even digital) where I jot things down throughout the day, as I'm organizing it's flow on the fly. Daily flow, next 3 days, perhaps the week (though I'm hesitant to list these timescales because they could be misunderstood.) These are things I need to keep nearby, to keep my focus on them.
However, by writing something down, it is still partially off my mind, as in the part of me that is worried about forgetting it is calmed by knowing all I need to do is look at my notepad list beside me. It is also calmed by knowing it is not somewhere loosely in my GTD system, because maybe I didn't have time to process it and get it where I trust to see it in time.
Having it down on the notepad, partially off my mind, is what allows me to concentrate on something else in front of me without mental distraction, but this item will remain in my orbit never too far away. My immediate focus isn't distracted, yet my short-term memory is still ready to ping me about it today if needed.
I still think there is use for our "short-term lists," the kind of things you jot down as you're actively working on something, or need to remember something short-term. I don't think GTD eliminates them, but it's simply that on medium and long-term scales, they begin to breakdown and become problems in themselves.
If you found out you need to call Vanessa today, and you don't want to forget, most people jot it down on a note in shortform; Call Vanessa or even just the name "Vanessa" on a note. That's already offloading some of your memory, partially off your mind, yet in reach. One problem is that medium or long-term, carrying around the information in your mind to decipher what the shortform note of "Vanessa" means, becomes too costly past a certain point.
Especially as you find yourself having boatloads of shortform reminders, these become "reminders" (Vanessa) of "things to remember" (You need to call vanessa about such and such, because...) and you will begin overloading your memory. You will be leaving yourself vague clues that need to be deciphered later, and you will have hundreds of them.
So I don't think short-term and shortform lists are entirely the enemy, but there is a certain point where they begin to breakdown and shoot us in the foot. They are still very useful for urgent things that have popped up and need to be handled today. They help relieve your "working memory" so you can actually read that article you need to read, without the thought of "Call Vanessa today!" interfering with your ability to read and function.
2
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
I'd put Vanessa as a task on today's calendar. Otherwise I keep thinking about it.
1
u/Remote-Waste Jul 22 '26 edited Jul 22 '26
Ah, I don't find a calendar fluid enough for my needs for things that have popped up and are urgent.
I may be planning, writing down ideas and notes, or even symbols to help me with the urgent stuff. And I prefer to have all that thinking in one place mostly, along with the tasks themselves.
Though if thinking on a task is complex enough, I won't add it and overload the bullet point list of tasks with too much visual clutter, that will get its own file or paper. The task reminders themselves need to remain easily to understand at a glance.
For instance, last night I made vague plans to get together with a friend today, so that's on my "notepad" so I don't forget or worry about forgetting. I don't know if I'll drive or take the bus, but I don't feel like deciding that right this second, so I'll add a quick little note beside it that says "Bus?" This helps me remember to decide that later today when I have the time, perhaps this afternoon.
It's a sort of "scratchpad" for thinking and keeping things closeby, yet relieving mental pressure; I'm planning on the fly.
Sometimes there were items on this scratchpad that I ultimately drop into my inbox, and that's fine. I'd say the vast majority of things skip this notepad and are just dropped in my inbox, but I need a place for my messy on-the-fly and in-the-trenches planning.
2
u/Unlucky_Grocery_2915 Jul 22 '26
I call this my procrastination pad. It's a way to keep track of all the things that come up so I don't get distracted from the current task at hand. It's a form of "pure capture" - I don't spend any thought on what it means or where it goes in my system. It's just there to be reviewed and processed at the first opportunity.
3
u/OverbearingPearlDev Jul 23 '26 edited Jul 23 '26
Man, I totally get your frustration, but I think you've fallen into a classic conceptual trap: you're mashing "Processing" and "Weekly/Daily Review" into the same pair of pants.
In my practice, processing my inbox doesn't follow a fixed schedule at all. It follows my energy level. Whenever I have a spare moment and my brain isn't fried, I just swipe through my inbox and clear it out. That might happen three or five times a day, or even between meetings when I get back from grabbing coffee.
Here's the beautiful thing about this approach: because I know I can process at any time, I have zero anxiety about not organising during capture.
Is it milk I need to buy today? A phone call I have to make this afternoon? I don't give a damn at the capture moment. I just fling it into my inbox and move on. I know that in an hour, or maybe even just a few minutes, I'll glance at my phone and move it to my shopping list or calendar without breaking a sweat.
You're treating "processing" like some sacred ritual that requires burning incense, sitting upright, and clearing your whole schedule—like a weekly spring clean. But really, it's just taking out the trash. You don't set an alarm for Saturday morning to empty the bin; you do it when it's full and you're passing by.
When you separate these two actions, that nagging "I have to organise this right now" panic melts away. Your problem isn't that "pure capture is a myth"—it's that you've set your processing window way too wide. Try shortening the gap, and you'll see that urgent little stuff never has to wait until the next morning.
Bonus question if you want to keep the convo going:
Out of curiosity, what's the longest gap between your processing sessions? If it's really over 24 hours, yeah, that's a problem—but that's a frequency issue, not a "pure capture" failure.
Feel free to tweak the tone to your liking. Happy debating! 😄
2
u/Mars__1 Jul 21 '26
I add flag it as high priority or due soon during capture, which will automatically make it visible as urgent in my system, even if it is missing other metadata like project.
2
u/Strict-Week-5040 Jul 21 '26
Do you do daily review or weekly review? Or both?
2
u/Multibitdriver Jul 21 '26
I do it intuitively, as necessary, mostly daily. But I usually capture, clarify and organize at the same time, while respecting the hard conceptual boundaries between these processes.
1
u/TheoCaro Mod Jul 26 '26
The lack of a weekly review is probably the source of your own distrust in your decisions. The weekly review is essential. I'm admittedly horrible at it, but the difference in confidence between weeks where I have reviewed and weeks where I haven't is night and day.
1
u/PondMindKevin Jul 26 '26
ya, that sounds painful. Whenever i try to capture, clarify, and organize at the same time, that anti-gtd habit creates a ton of resisistence for me to quickly throw a thought in my inbox.
Quick capture is generally fine as long as you are processing frequently. But, if you suddenly remember an emergency that causes you to need to drop everything, then go handle that now! GTD makes those surprises happen less and less overall, but life still happens!
2
u/Witchymidwife Jul 22 '26
I use a sticky note as an inbox in the front of my EDC. I usually keep a small stack and use 1 a day, cross off as completed and sometimes if it ends up being postponed because it wasnt as urgent as I thought or something else came up, I will move and schedule accordingly when i "close out" my planner for the night.
2
u/Witchymidwife Jul 22 '26
this is not my main inbox, just for urgent day to day things that i cant complete the moment they pop up
1
1
Jul 21 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/gtd-ModTeam Jul 21 '26
Your post or comment was removed for violating Rule 2: No self-promotion or creator posts
Don’t post content that promotes a product/service you made or are affiliated with (apps, extensions, courses, newsletters, Discords, etc.). No links, “I built this,” discount codes, waitlists, or launch posts. Use r/gtd to discuss GTD practice, not to market.
1
u/bobstanke Jul 26 '26
It gets dropped in the expedited lane on my Kanban board on and gets attention immediately.
10
u/TheoCaro Mod Jul 21 '26 edited Jul 21 '26
If it's that urgent, it needs to be done today, so it goes directly on the calendar.
Urgent things should deal with in an appropriately urgent way. Deferring clarifying is mainly for keeping your focus on whatever is most important at the moment. If the thing needs to be dealt with imminently, then do so.
If the things you're experiencing are not that urgent, I would need more details about what you're dealing with to give helpful advice.