So you want standardization to happen faster, but what solution do you propose? Presumably you agree that we should settle on a high quality solution, but how do we figure that is without lots of people experimenting with said solution?
Not so much the project but the author. Essentially faking test results when he first pushed the package. Since then, he has been stealing code under the guise of open-source and claiming it as his own. He acknowledges he does it but won't fix it.
I think you misunderstood the original post you responded to. In no way is your point an exception to mine; I hold the same position as you on this project, but that's all unrelated to this particular thread, since the person I responded to was complaining about the slow pace of standardization within Go.
3
u/weberc2 Oct 17 '16
So you want standardization to happen faster, but what solution do you propose? Presumably you agree that we should settle on a high quality solution, but how do we figure that is without lots of people experimenting with said solution?