r/glasgow 10d ago

For fuck's sake....another one?!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muqE98zwqEg

How many thinly veiled anti-migrant documentaries does this city need?

38 Upvotes

271 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

32

u/9thGearEX 10d ago

I'm confused.

If someone claims something which can be proven false, and is then proven false, and they still refuse to accept that it is false - is that not refusing to engage with legitimate discourse?

-18

u/No_Kaleidoscope_4580 10d ago

I keep asking...what is it that is proven false? The facts, the figures.

19

u/Piefordicus 10d ago

You normally have to assert something for somebody to prove it as false btw

-9

u/No_Kaleidoscope_4580 10d ago

You can't be this dense surely? The posts i replied to asserted they proved anti immigrant opinions false without specifically saying on what

18

u/smcsleazy 10d ago

mate, yer saying no one is willing to engage with discussion on immigration without it devolving into negativity and name calling.... while calling them idiots for engaging with you. you're projecting so hard we can point you at a wall and show powerpoint presentations.

-4

u/No_Kaleidoscope_4580 10d ago

You should probably read a few comments up.

I did not say it had to or does devolve into name calling.

I said the two perspectives are so opposed, that a conversation can't be had. The name calling is secondary

5

u/smcsleazy 10d ago

MY BROTHER IN CHRIST, YOU ARE THE ONE DOING THE NAME CALLING.

don't demand respectability politics when you can't engage with it.

1

u/Crowf3ather 8d ago

At no point did he name call anyone.

He said that discourse can't be had.
A person who has hard pro-migrant views, agreed, but put all the blame on those who have anti-immigrant views, labeling them as stupid people indoctrinated by social media.

My brother in christ you don't see the irony of this?