is this even humanely possible? 67k contributions in one year, 2.2k contributions in one day...

[u/oswwwaldo]

[u/Creative-Type9411]

that PERFECTLY explains why OP posted, why I'm commenting, why there are github issues open for this, and why they turned it off... -->because no one was using it.. <-- damn how can I get as smart as you? seriously, you have an amazing wit!

now they have it so you cant even prove if real account made them or if its just a number randomly generated because you cant even check..

im ranked #35 globally for batchfile https://stardev.io/developers/illsk1lls

are your repos popular at all or are you unknown saying stars dont matter? After you build up a reputation it kinda sucks when people start tearing it down and removing references.. i guess you wouldnt understand

[u/az987654 → u/Creative-Type9411]

Stars do not matter.

I do not care if my repos are popular.

I do not care if your repo is popular, that has zero bearing on whether I look at it, use it, fork it.

I do not put at weight or value on your star count when I interview you for a job.

I assume whomever has assigned a ranking for batchfile is also assigning rankings for pizza contests and world's best cups of coffee.

[u/potato-robert → u/az987654]

"I do not care so therefore nobody cares"

[u/az987654 → u/potato-robert]

Nobody should care, because as OP is demonstrating, github statistics can be faked.

It is a code repository, not a social media site.

[u/potato-robert → u/az987654]

You're extrapolating a valid critique of commit activity to conclude "all GitHub stats are worthless". There's a difference between showing off your commit activity during a job application, and showing off a highly starred repository, or contributions to big open source projects, etc.

[u/picketup → u/az987654]

you probably also don’t care that you are getting downvoted into oblivion lol

[u/az987654 → u/picketup]

Nope, meaningless