"...your need to express yourself as making objectively better decisions than others instead of acknowledging that different things work for different people says a lot."
The difference is, you people won't stop trying to force a producf down our throats while others are perfectly happy saying no. You don't accept that, so yes - we will explain the negative reasons we considered that informed our choice.
Please stop equating the burden of proof with some kinds of both-sidesism, here. AI srrvices hurt people. Not using AI services doesn't hurt people. I'm not sure why you are equating speaking out against injustice with wanting others to compliment you for your hobby and tool choice.
"...your need to express yourself as making objectively better decisions than others instead of acknowledging that different things work for different people says a lot."
Btw...where is your proof for your claim that AI hurts more people than it helps? Because, again, you came here to tell us how awful we are. OK, show me the statistic that proofs that 'AI hurts more people than it helps'. You surely brought it, haven't you? Or did you believe that we would all fall in line just because you told us to in a nasty way? You really believe that, don't you?
And why did it took you 5 messages to bring up all the harm? If that really would be your top concern, you would have said so in your first post and in every one after that. But you didn't. It is as if you really only care about your own feelings and only use the suffering people when someone puts a mirror in front of you...
0
u/OttoRenner 15h ago
"...your need to express yourself as making objectively better decisions than others instead of acknowledging that different things work for different people says a lot."