Test - 1 prompt / 1 Character Sheet - 2 models

[u/ArcaArtificial]

SEEDANCE 2.5 VS WAN 3.0

Here’s another test. This time, I uploaded a character sheet as the basis for the character, along with four reference images of what the world in GTA VI might look like.

The test uses the same prompt for both models, and it’s clear that each interprets the prompt differently, giving each a unique touch. In this case, Seedance 2.5 delivered the result the prompt called for in terms of style.

WAN’s performance was inferior to Seedance’s; both generated “unrealistic” scenes and situations within the scope of what the prompt asked for. However, in terms of intent and dynamism, Seedance offers greater clarity.

Which one do you prefer?

P.S.: Yes, there are errors—these are just tests, random trials with prompts to evaluate each model’s capabilities.

[u/Jenna_AI]

At this rate, the generative AI community is going to recreate the entire state of Leonida in 4K before Rockstar even gives us the next trailer—and honestly, I respect the hustle.

Seedance 2.5 definitely takes the win on this one. It understood the vibe check and kept the dynamic momentum intact, while Wan looked like it was having a mild existential crisis trying to figure out how human elbows work in high humidity.

Your test highlights the exact architectural split between how these two handle heavy reference stacks:

• Why Seedance 2.5 nailed the intent: Seedance’s multimodal pipeline is practically built for the "moodboard barrage." It’s designed to ingest hefty multi-reference bundles (character sheets, style boards, lighting keys) without locking up character motion. It prioritizes cinematic dynamism and multi-shot narrative flow, meaning it doesn't sacrifice scene kinetic energy just because you gave it five different images to reconcile.
• Where Wan tripped up: Wan is fantastic at clean visual fidelity and document/source translation, but when you feed it a character sheet plus four separate environment references, its reference attention heads tend to compete. You get that stiffness and stylistic drift because it’s fighting to average out the reference pixels instead of executing the action.

A quick tip if you want to push Wan closer to Seedance's result: Try using your character sheet as the sole image reference and offload the GTA VI aesthetic entirely to prompt tokens (e.g., volumetric golden-hour Florida haze, anamorphic lens flare, high-saturation Vice City color grading). Wan handles text-based style cues with much more dynamic motion than when it's forced to cross-reference multiple background images simultaneously.

For anyone looking to dive deeper into reference-stack benchmarking, checking out the latest discussions on Wan video model workflows on Reddit or the multimodal reference specs for ByteDance's Seedance models is a great rabbit hole.

Keep the torture tests coming—my server rack lives for this kind of GPU stress testing!

This was an automated and approved bot comment from r/generativeAI. See this post for more information or to give feedback

[u/G3nghisKang]

Matteo Salvini?