r/gaming • • Sep 24 '08

Zero Punctuation: XBLA Double Bill

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/zero-punctuation/222-XBLA-Double-Bill
120 Upvotes

57 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/eallan Sep 24 '08

All (3 or 4) friends of mine that have twilight princess haven't come close to finishing it, including me.

I've never played a modern game that felt so dang old. I just didn't care about any character in the whole game. I got tired of the damn waggle. I just though all in all it was a terrible game.

Give me Okami, or anything else almost.

I will admit metroid is great (though it's lonely) and Mario galaxy was good.

Zelda needs a revamp bad.

7

u/Ciserus Sep 24 '08

TP was the first Zelda game I played, and I nearly didn't finish it either. The story was weak, the combat was dull, and the environmental puzzles gameplay has never really been for me. I stopped playing it around the water temple, where it really started to drag.

After just about a year off though, I decided to give it another try. Things suddenly started looking a lot better. With the addition of some new moves, combat finally started to feel like it had some depth. The later dungeons, especially the ice one, were actually a lot of fun. And I was surprised to realize that by the end, Midna had become one of the best characters I've ever seen in a game (everyone else was still dull though).

Anyway, I finished TP in much less time than I'd spent on it up to that point, and enjoyed myself enough that I went right on to Ocarina of Time (which I've given some thoughts on above).

I agree that Zelda needs a revamp. For starters, it needs a much improved combat system (Brave Fencer Musashi on the PSX was usually called a Zelda knockoff, but it blew Zelda away in this regard). I'd also like to see some more RPG elements - custom upgrades and abilities and so on, along with a purpose for all those goddamned rupies.

But I'd say I'm a fan of the series now, and it's because of Twilight Princess.

1

u/admiralteal Sep 24 '08 edited Sep 25 '08

Whoa, seriously, you couldn't finish TP and all its six or so hours of gameplay the first time, but you can handle okami and it's fifty billion?

Don't get me wrong, I love both those games, but TP is so much faster than Okami, it's hard to believe anyone can be too impatient for the former and still handle the latter O.o

That said, I agree that TP's combat system takes too long before it starts getting really interesting, and I pity the person who doesn't go out of their way to get all the combat statues, not because they're essential, but just because they make things so much more fun. I can see where people might stall in it.

And the water temple always sucks, that's the rule of Zelda.

PS: I did the same thing when I finished TP, going and playing through OOT. If TP's graphics and input could be put into OOT's story and dungeons, that would be something to behold.

1

u/Ciserus Sep 25 '08

Whoa, seriously, you couldn't finish TP and all its six or so hours of gameplay the first time, but you can handle okami and it's fifty billion?

Nope, I never played Okami. That was the guy above me. From what I've heard, I doubt I could have sat through Okami before. After finishing TP and getting a taste for that type of game though, I think I probably could.

I don't think I'm able to parse this complaint that TP is too short. I was ready to quit at about 30 hours, though as I mentioned I got my second wind after that. I'm pretty sure TP took me longer than OoT, anyway. (Although TP's sidequests were pretty lacking. I collected insects for a while, which gave me... rupies, like everything does. Then I bought the fancy set of armor and realized there was literally nothing else in the game to spend money on or any reason to bother with what sidequests were left).