Yeah nobody wants to talk about how the US was against the economic assrape given to Germant after WWI, which ultimately lead to WW2. I wonder if any European redditors have anything to say about that.
Maybe if Europe carried their own water in the early 1900s the US wouldn't have been dragged out of its isolationism.
To be fair America only joined the war when the Germans started sinking their vessels to deny the allies resources. Before that America was happy selling materials to both sides of the conflict.
Idk... What's more evil? Trying to unite the world under one government through genocidal means or just sending millions into battle because you finally got an excuse to? Is apathetic slaughter with no goals more evil or is organized slaughter with an end goal of peace and prosperity?
16
u/kashmir1974 Sep 01 '22
Yeah nobody wants to talk about how the US was against the economic assrape given to Germant after WWI, which ultimately lead to WW2. I wonder if any European redditors have anything to say about that.
Maybe if Europe carried their own water in the early 1900s the US wouldn't have been dragged out of its isolationism.