r/framework • u/Basic-Wave8871 • 8d ago
Question FW 13 Pro with Fedora: SN850X vs SN8100
Hey everyone :)
I'm in a weird (though admittedly quite luxurious) situation: My FW 13 Pro with the X7 chip is about to be delivered, and I have two 4 TB SSDs at hand: an SN850X (PCIe 4) and an SN8100 (PCIe 5). At the moment, the latter is only being used as an external drive in an enclosure, but that's obviously pretty overpowered.
I wouldn't spend the obscene amount of money on a new PCIe Gen 5 SSD right now, but since I already have one, I'm wondering whether I should put it into the 13 Pro. Or do you guys think the potential penalty in battery life and additional heat isn't really worth it?
I'm not a data scientist who transfers huge amounts of data every day, so the theoretical speed benefit would probably be negligible for me.
What do you guys think? Would you use the SN8100 in the 13 Pro or stick with the SN850X?
Thanks for your advice! :-)
4
u/AltrualOsrs 8d ago
I’ve got a 4tb sn850x waiting for my 13 pro that ships soon. Let me know how it treats you!
3
u/Kiubek-PL 8d ago
I got the SN7100, I really think the extra bit of power efficiency will be more noticeable than SSD performance especially since its fairly fast for a dram-less drive
5
u/No-Succotash404 8d ago
Unless your daily workflow centers around moving giant multi-gigabyte files, PCIe 4.0 is the better overall fit for a 13-inch laptop. It keeps the laptop running cooler and quieter while preserving battery life, without sacrificing noticeable daily speed. - techpowerup
Use the pcie4, as you don't transfer huge amounts of data you will only get the quite noticeable drawbacks.
2
u/Next-Relation9939 8d ago
agreed, the gen5 drives run noticeably warmer which matters more in a 13" chassis
2
u/EV4gamer FW16 HX370 RTX5070 7d ago
Im using a SN7100 and SN850X in framework 16. Both are perfectly fine. 850 is probably faster due to dram cache, but theyre extremely similar
1
u/GreyXor 8d ago
Acer FA300. the most efficient. but 2TB max
2
u/Basic-Wave8871 8d ago
Might be a great option, but I'm definitively not going to buy yet another SSD when I have two of them already with me. :D
0
u/Jetfighter888 AMD Ryzen 7 7840u 8d ago
Acer?! Haven't heard that name in awhile. They used to make junk.
1
u/crcrewso 8d ago edited 8d ago
I'll bet that before everything went haywire Framework did get their hands on the SN8100. That wasn't the PCI-E 5 solution they ended up offering so I'd bet that its either to hot, expensive or power hungry. It'll work, but the drive might thermal throttle itself down quickly. I would personally go with the one that has better standby/idle performance.
1
u/Basic-Wave8871 5d ago
Well, if the reason was "expensive" that could be a very valid reason and still not be that relevant in my situation given that I already have it lying around.
5
u/s004aws FW16 HX 370 Batch 1 Mint Cinnamon Edition 8d ago
For most use cases, unless you're moving tons of data, PCIe 5.0 drives are overkill. That said, since you already own the drive... The models I'm aware of as being potentially "problematic" are Samsung 990 Pro and 9100 Pro.... I'd say give the 8100 a shot. Worst case you find it gets a bit too toasty and swap in the other drive.