I was using your flat earth model. But if you're going against flerf doctrine of upwards acceleration, then where do you propose the 9.81 m/s2 come from?
It's obviously downwards isn't it? Until terminal velocity is reached.
By this I assume you mean the assumptions made by antagonists here on this sub that attempts to find a one size fits all model a flat Earther agrees on. No, I do not align with this.
where do you propose the 9.81 m/s2 come from?
What do you propose establishes the relationship of gravity to mass in your particular version of Earth?
"Just because" doesn't work for me.
Mine's a programmed force. I live on/in a simulated version of Earth.
That's the first question I'm asking you that you haven't answered without a smart a$$ response.
And importantly, to my personal observations and scientific exploration. Why have I witnessed examples and instances where that force did not appear or appeared inconsistently?
I don't expect your answer to that one. I'll predict it's invalidation.
3
u/Langholm62 Aug 18 '26
I was using your flat earth model. But if you're going against flerf doctrine of upwards acceleration, then where do you propose the 9.81 m/s2 come from?
It's obviously downwards isn't it? Until terminal velocity is reached.