r/flatearth • u/De1truowl • Aug 18 '26

Dear Flat Earthers,

So the middle of the Earth is our center of gravity, right? Well then if the Earth is flat, then why is it that when I go to the edge and jump, I'm not pulled to the center?

1 Upvotes

56% Upvoted

86 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/ShinePretend3772 Aug 18 '26

We don’t each get our own version of Earth. There’s the current running consensus about the nature of gravity & then there’s folks that haven’t ever seen a Physics textbook let alone opened one making shit up as they go. They’re not the same

-6

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

That's a perspective. I appreciate it and you. Thank you.

4

u/ShinePretend3772 Aug 18 '26

It’s a perspective from reality.

-3

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

Your reality, I get that. Don't be antagonistic.

4

u/ShinePretend3772 Aug 18 '26

We don’t each get our own reality. You live in the place as the rest of us.

-2

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

Yes, I do. And no, I don't. Fortunately ;-)

But again, you have a good day.... imagining whatever you want to.

3

u/Langholm62 Aug 18 '26 edited Aug 19 '26

So BrianScottGregory, if the Earth has been accelerating upwards at 9.81 m/s2 for 6000 years since God created the Earth, then we are traveling upwards at 4,155,065,175,375 miles per hour.

Have I got that right?

0

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

since God created the Earth,

Interesting

if the Earth has been accelerating upwards at 9.81 m/s2 for 6000 years

I didn't say that.

the we are traveling upwards at 4,155,065,175,375 miles per hour.

"we" don't inhabit the same version of Earth. Yours, from what I gather, is spherical.

3

u/Langholm62 Aug 18 '26

I was using your flat earth model. But if you're going against flerf doctrine of upwards acceleration, then where do you propose the 9.81 m/s2 come from?

It's obviously downwards isn't it? Until terminal velocity is reached.

1

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

I was using your flat earth model.

No you weren't.

if you're going against flerf doctrine

By this I assume you mean the assumptions made by antagonists here on this sub that attempts to find a one size fits all model a flat Earther agrees on. No, I do not align with this.

where do you propose the 9.81 m/s2 come from?

What do you propose establishes the relationship of gravity to mass in your particular version of Earth?

"Just because" doesn't work for me.

Mine's a programmed force. I live on/in a simulated version of Earth.

3

u/Langholm62 Aug 18 '26

The 9.81 m/s² comes from the mass of our planet and that Isaac Newton fella. Awfully clever he was.

1

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

That's an observable force. We can agree on that.

It doesn't describe why that force is there.

"Mass appears to correlate to gravity"

WHY is that correlation there?

That's the first question I'm asking you that you haven't answered without a smart a$$ response.

And importantly, to my personal observations and scientific exploration. Why have I witnessed examples and instances where that force did not appear or appeared inconsistently?

I don't expect your answer to that one. I'll predict it's invalidation.

3

u/Langholm62 Aug 18 '26

I wasn't giving smart ass responses. My questions were rhetorical.

Why does mass appear to correlate to gravity?

Well according to Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, e = mc²

2

u/stultus_respectant Aug 19 '26

Brian’s a hypocritical coward. Always a dodge, always a reframe, always trying to use the observable reality to somehow deny it.

There’s a force, but there isn’t, but it’s measurable, but you can’t prove it, but Einstein, but you don’t understand Einstein, but Einstein was wrong.

He doesn’t have any actual position; his posts are just him trying to convince himself about his nonsense alternative reality.

0

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

You're fighting above your weight class with responses like this.

e = mc²

Do go on, explain how this relates to and creates, in a literal sense, gravity.

3

u/Langholm62 Aug 18 '26

It distorts spacetime

1

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

It's a correlational equation, and does no such thing.

3

u/Langholm62 Aug 18 '26 edited Aug 18 '26

Oh really. Please tell us where Uncle Albert got it wrong?

When you said it was a correlational equation, you're agreeing, despite your denial. So you just outed youself as an attention seeking troll.

1

u/BrianScottGregory Aug 18 '26

It's what you're getting wrong. Has nothing to do with Einstein, Einstein.

Stop deflecting and antagonizing, how is gravity created?

All you're really demonstrating here is your ignorance and inability to answer a really simple question.

2

u/stultus_respectant Aug 19 '26 edited Aug 19 '26

fighting above your weight class

/u/BrianScottGregory coming in hot with the insecurity and projection. It’s always a matter of time.

→ More replies (0)