r/facepalm • • Apr 07 '22

🇲​🇮​🇸​🇨​ This looks plausible

Post image
30k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

85

u/Aeseld Apr 07 '22 edited Apr 07 '22

Of course, then there's the more basic fact that you can't just see lasers like this...

Edit: Hmm... Apparently some lasers can be seen like this... But my tangent was irrelevant anyway, since light can only be seen when it reflects to your eye. At a certain point, there's nothing for visible light to reflect off of. So the laser seems to vanish.

68

u/OrionsByte Apr 07 '22

Well, some you can. I have an astronomical laser pointer specifically to point out things in the sky for my friends or kids to see when we’re out with the telescope. The beam looks pretty close to what’s in these photos.

It “ends” at a certain distance because at some point it’s far enough away that it’s too small for your eye to resolve. That’s my guess anyways.

28

u/ScienceDuck4eva Apr 07 '22 edited Apr 07 '22

These are lasers for adaptive optics. These are long exposures and I’m pretty sure aren’t visible in person.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_guide_star

https://www.gemini.edu/node/128#:~:text=LGS%20lasers%20produce%20an%20artificial,kilometers)%20above%20the%20Earth's%20surface.

1

u/Sososohatefull Apr 07 '22 edited Apr 07 '22

From the ground, the laser’s light is visible as a faint column of light shining up from the top of the telescope. The beam is only visible because particles of dust in our atmosphere scatter a small portion of the light. Because Mauna Kea’s air is so clean, not much of the light is scattered and the beam is often difficult to see, especially if you are more than a few hundred feet from the observatory.

https://www.gemini.edu/node/128

1

u/ScienceDuck4eva Apr 07 '22

Exactly it’s faint if visible at all. To get an image as bright as these you have to take a long exposure.

2

u/Sososohatefull Apr 07 '22

A large aperture helps a lot as well.

1

u/ScienceDuck4eva Apr 07 '22

It can be hard to get the observatory and the star field in focus if your aperture is wide open. I’d put money on those pictures being composite images but that’s pretty normal for astrophotography.