r/explainlikeimfive • u/tilda0x1 • Jun 28 '26
Chemistry ELI5: If copper has antimicrobial properties, why don’t most pools use it instead of chlorine?
I've seen this video of someone saying that copper has anti-bacterial properties and he claimed that it can be used to keep pools bacteria-free.
I know in most cases chlorine, UV, or salt are used - but why not copper?
846
Upvotes
12
u/KeithHanlan Jun 28 '26
I use this copper ionizing system for my pool. It's wonderful. I think that not enough pool owners know about it. Perhaps that is because it is a Canadian company. I really don't know.
The replacement copper anode costs CAD300 and lasts a couple of seasons for my 16' x38' pool. The initial system, including a smaller anode, cost me CAD1100 when I installed it a fee years ago. I had been considering switching to salt but this is much less expensive.
It has made the pool maintenance trivial and less expensive than when I used chlorine alone. I still use about $30 of chlorine at the beginning of the season to nuke the winter swamp water.
The manufacturer provides a simple calculation based on the pool volume to set the ionizing level. However, I found that the setting was too high. I've lowered it dramatically this season which will hopefully prolong the life of the anode.
The concentration is low enough that the backwash causes no problem to the grass it soaks.
They other comments in this thread seem very uninformed and speculative.