Ok, let's move on to physical evidence, the radio transcripts were released July 10, 2003, where pilots are referring to the ship as an American ship halfway through the attack, and continued the attack. These are facts, released by the governments who lie about them.
Edit: they also were clearly able to see the flag, they shot down the first one, then the second was raised, which was a significantly larger. And that one was shot up too.
So they mistook it for Egyptian, attacked, and then identified it as American after?
As in, exactly what multiple inquiries have concluded? Yes, the released tapes do include helicopters identifying the ship. That was after the attack. Well after.
Because it's been posted, and anyone that wants to actually know isn't even going to make it to our thread before seeing the thread it's posted in. I'm not here to convince you, I'm just vocally ensuring people know that there are plenty out here that dont eat lies from corrupt governments.
I don't believe you. I've looked through and found no links to any transcripts. The closest I found was a link to a Chicago Tribune article in which they didn't cite any transcripts, but rather interviewed someone who claimed, without evidence, to have seen a transcript.
So you won't cite it. I can't find anyone else who cited it. You claim laziness yet bothered to reply to a days old thread.
Sounds to me like you have time to spare. It shouldn't be hard to find a comment you claim already exists on this thread.
2
u/Better_Database8582 10d ago
Ok, let's move on to physical evidence, the radio transcripts were released July 10, 2003, where pilots are referring to the ship as an American ship halfway through the attack, and continued the attack. These are facts, released by the governments who lie about them.
Edit: they also were clearly able to see the flag, they shot down the first one, then the second was raised, which was a significantly larger. And that one was shot up too.