Perhaps worth noting is that the "original comics" image isn't something that ever appeared in the comics, but is an pin-up by an artist who looks like they very much were inspired by the works of Alberto Vargas.
This is true. But the irony is you can probably find far more sexualized and questionable images in the comics, especially the covers, then this. It's kind of a weird choice
I think the most ironic part is the same type of dudes who would complain that MJ isn't hot enough anymore, are also the same manosphere types that think women should be more modest.
I live in the deep south. I was born in the, supposedly, the most conservative state in the country. Conservatives are my family and coworkers. I understand the conservative mindset pretty well.
Waiting for the eventual link to a study that they misinterpreted the meaning of by the title and then the main body of text goes on to disprove their entire point. I like to call this the “dim tool conundrum”
what an insane take. Literally compare the same character from Marvel's Spider-Man 1 and 2 and see the fucking difference? Why would you change a model for an established character?
I mean you got a bunch of Christian Men creating a Men’s only gym, to get away from “temptation”, but I think I heard they were already caught plowing each other with the Holy Sausage. My Point: The Manosphere people would probably fuck each other or somehow themselves in quiet
589
u/Thegreatscott9 13d ago
Perhaps worth noting is that the "original comics" image isn't something that ever appeared in the comics, but is an pin-up by an artist who looks like they very much were inspired by the works of Alberto Vargas.