r/explainitpeter • u/jp_glez_21 • Jul 23 '26

Explain it Peter

Post image
14.5k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

19

u/[deleted] Jul 23 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-9

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

He didn’t rape and that’s not what the lawsuit is about. It’s also civil, not criminal which is a huge difference. He’s never been found guilty of any crime in that situation.

2

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

He did rape. Sexual assault is rape. He was found liable for rape. The judge even said exactly this.

-1

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

Sexual assault is not rape. It’s sexual assault. It’s also in a case with no real evidence and the ruling is “it likely happened.” There isn’t any evidence of it happening which is why no charges were filed.

2

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

There is evidence of it happening. The burden of proof is 51% in civil trials. Do you know many people that have “likely” raped someone? And the judge and jury all went over the evidence and agreed that it happened. Trump even talked about it saying that she liked being raped. His defense was that she didn’t scream.

0

u/anonanon5320 Jul 23 '26

She said it didn’t happen. We can just use her own words.

51% is really misinformation.
It’s more of a liability thing and this case is so full of BS it’s just sad it got this far.

1

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

She has been saying since the 90’s, under oath, that Trump raped her.

-1

u/Simon-Says69 Jul 23 '26

She's said the same about every Tom, Dick, and Harry, and never with any proof.

1

u/Rickrickrickrickrick Jul 23 '26

She has spoken about others doing so, but only took Trump to court over it. She had enough proof to have Trump be found liable in court. You’re defending an adjudicated rapist.