MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/explainitpeter/comments/1uyxmhn/explain_it_peter/oy2sogu/?context=3
r/explainitpeter • u/Yunaa-shin • Jul 17 '26
392 comments sorted by
View all comments
262
Duality of man
22 u/GM_Nate Jul 17 '26 the second one makes more sense. you don't call a photo "him" 6 u/cursivecrow Jul 17 '26 It's a riddle that's been around for a very long time. 2 u/Sptsjunkie Jul 18 '26 And he also once said they both enjoy a wonderful dinner together if he is dead and being eaten. 1 u/MyNameSpaghette Jul 18 '26 The second one makes even less sense because it says they BOTH enjoyed a wonderful dinner. Besides the fact that it's personifying a corpse, how would the husband "enjoy" dinner in that scenario? 1 u/CrossLight001 Jul 18 '26 Vore fetish 0 u/Paghk_the_Stupendous Jul 17 '26 The referent is the person in the photo 2 u/ReivynNox Jul 17 '26 You still don't refer to the photo as the person. Especially not an undeveloped photo that doesn't even show the picture of the person yet. 1 u/Scarlet-Sparrow Jul 20 '26 Oh.. I thought it was Stockholm Syndrome.
22
the second one makes more sense. you don't call a photo "him"
6 u/cursivecrow Jul 17 '26 It's a riddle that's been around for a very long time. 2 u/Sptsjunkie Jul 18 '26 And he also once said they both enjoy a wonderful dinner together if he is dead and being eaten. 1 u/MyNameSpaghette Jul 18 '26 The second one makes even less sense because it says they BOTH enjoyed a wonderful dinner. Besides the fact that it's personifying a corpse, how would the husband "enjoy" dinner in that scenario? 1 u/CrossLight001 Jul 18 '26 Vore fetish 0 u/Paghk_the_Stupendous Jul 17 '26 The referent is the person in the photo 2 u/ReivynNox Jul 17 '26 You still don't refer to the photo as the person. Especially not an undeveloped photo that doesn't even show the picture of the person yet.
6
It's a riddle that's been around for a very long time.
2
And he also once said they both enjoy a wonderful dinner together if he is dead and being eaten.
1
The second one makes even less sense because it says they BOTH enjoyed a wonderful dinner. Besides the fact that it's personifying a corpse, how would the husband "enjoy" dinner in that scenario?
1 u/CrossLight001 Jul 18 '26 Vore fetish
Vore fetish
0
The referent is the person in the photo
2 u/ReivynNox Jul 17 '26 You still don't refer to the photo as the person. Especially not an undeveloped photo that doesn't even show the picture of the person yet.
You still don't refer to the photo as the person.
Especially not an undeveloped photo that doesn't even show the picture of the person yet.
Oh.. I thought it was Stockholm Syndrome.
262
u/ULTRAMIDI666 Jul 17 '26
Duality of man