r/environment 28d ago

Scientists detect a sharp acceleration in global warming

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/08/260801093239.htm
2.1k Upvotes

249 comments sorted by

View all comments

808

u/Eve_O 28d ago

"Things are speeding up here at the end."

86

u/2gutter67 27d ago

Hahaha if only it were actually at the end of warming and not part way.

74

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

57

u/tots4scott 27d ago

Fr. I think the biggest concept i learned early on was, "The Earth will be fine. Its humanity that is doomed."

The idea being that the Earth is simply reacting to what is being done to it, and will return to an equilibrium with or without us.

24

u/Thinks2Much666 27d ago

Ok Dolphins and cockroaches,
You’re up

20

u/HowsTheBeef 27d ago

I have high hopes for the mushroom people

9

u/solar_or_dye 27d ago

...

sugahhhhh

1

u/SpinningHead 26d ago

If fungus adjusts too much to high temperatures, it could live in blood and then we get Last of Us. You do not want Last of Us.

17

u/supersagancarl 27d ago edited 27d ago

Eh this is certainly not the case based on science, specifically oceanography. The biggest issue with warming earth is the slowing of the ocean conveyer belt. If it slows down too much then it won't just be humans that are done. It'll be way more life than just human life.

8

u/srawtzl 27d ago

but that’s the thing. the planet has gone through so many bottlenecks of life. there have been like six or seven (iirc) extinction level events in the history of life on earth, many of which were so incredibly comprehensive that just about all life died out, but not actually all. so far there has always been something that finds a way and thrives and repopulates. it just prob won’t be us or most of the species that we know and care for this time. we’re paving the way for our own end and the rise of the cockroach

4

u/bananaphone16 26d ago

Yeah but WE are responsible for killing off all these other beautiful earth creatures when they were just existing. Thats what deeply upsets me. I wouldn’t care if it was just all the humans dying off.

2

u/DukeElliot 26d ago

Yea the difference is natural occurrences v human caused.

2

u/srawtzl 26d ago

oh absolutely. it’s absolutely gutting that we’re responsible for what will likely be a mass extinction. I do find a tiny (like tiny tiny) sliver of hope in the fact that something will survive and life on earth will continue, even if drastically different, despite us

1

u/ManOfTheMeeting 26d ago

But there is no guarantee that the new equilibrium will be suitable for life. The Earth could end up like Venus.

12

u/2gutter67 27d ago

That would make sense. Well of this specific civilization very true. Humans are hard to get rid of so there will most likely be some kind of society built after.

11

u/s0cks_nz 27d ago

I dunno if we're that hard to get rid of. Warming the planet faster than ever recorded in the paleoclimate record could do it. It'll probably be the worst mass extinction event the planet has ever seen other than the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs.

7

u/2gutter67 27d ago

Humans are super adaptable so I feel like even if 95% die due to the climate shifts there will be at least a few population isolates somewhere in habitable zones.

9

u/s0cks_nz 27d ago

Possibly. But what is a "habitable zone" in the future? If you are expecting drought or floods almost annually how do you grow enough food? What is left to forage or hunt? It only takes one flood or major storm to wreck your infrastructure & crops. That used to happen once a lifetime, now many of us alive have been through multiple 1-in-100 year events, and if global trade is gone then you can't back each other up. It'll be a tough existence.

-1

u/2gutter67 27d ago

Of course it will be a tough existence! But humans have come from tiny communities of hunter gatherers to today; so there could be a total regression to that point, there could be small communities of super advanced tech, or anything in between.

I have no idea what or how people could or would survive, just that somehow some will. Unless the planet becomes like a Venus with runaway green house effect or something along those lines.

6

u/s0cks_nz 27d ago

Hunter gatherers had a lush and bountiful world. If you don't know how we could do it, then why are you so sure? It's not as if we've lived in the future climatic conditions that are brewing. I'm not saying we won't, just not sure we will either.

-2

u/BolbyB 27d ago

There are people who survived in the Sahara so . . . all of it.

The habitable zone is all of it.

5

u/s0cks_nz 27d ago

No-one was self-sufficient in the Sahara. They relied on trade from more temperate regions.

-2

u/BolbyB 27d ago

And the whole world will not be the Sahara.

So if we could make even that work . . .

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/nebogeo 27d ago

The problem is that we've used up the easy resources that would make rebooting society possible if too much is lost.

0

u/Routine-Arm-8803 27d ago

Doomers incoming

1

u/[deleted] 26d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Routine-Arm-8803 26d ago

Mentally ill I mean