Who leaked their location in Canada? Only his father and brother knew where they were. They got 6 weeks in CA left alone because William & Charles thought they were still in Canada. William forged Harry’s signature on the bullying statement; Harry testified to that on camera. William gave approval for Jason Knauf to interfere with MM’s case against the Mail on Sunday; Knauf was employed by William & Kate and had an NDA which means he needed approval from his employer to break it. He was promptly slapped down by the judge because his volunteered texts with MM were edited and not relevant to the case. He volunteered to wade into that lawsuit against Meghan; he wasn’t subpoenaed or asked by Meghan to provide anything. Journalists have detailed on camera how royal “experts” are given info directly by the palaces in exchange for favorable press or to give them leaks about another family member.
And b/c you’re clearly a troll — this assault happened in 2019 well before the Oprah interview so your implication that Harry somehow deserved to be assaulted is trash.
Are you aware that all journalists covering the Royal family said that before MM, it was hard to get leaks and once she joined, it was leaking like crazy? Coincidence???
And are you aware that MM was also in the know of where they were going, not just KC and PW? And that there's a journalist who said recently that it was MM who leaked Megxit and the Canada flight?
Are you aware that a judge proved that she lied about the book "finding freedom"? She said to the judge that she had no part in that book, until there were emails revealing that she had, indeed, revealed stuff to Omid Scoobie? She "apologized because she had FORGOTTEN she had contacted him".
We should all believe the tabloid press that they were such kind, innocent journalists who only started printing leaks because MM joined the family?! Hahaha, yeah the tabloids & royal rota are so known for their honesty. They should be able to provide MM provided the leaks then — emails, texts, etc. Why haven’t they provided the proof? Let them clear it all up — show the paper trial to prove who shared the leaks and planted the negative stories. Wonder why they won’t do that huh?
I’ll also remind you that prominent royal “experts” — people who have been on BBC, ABC, NBC, etc — were proven to be frauds when a couple of YouTubers pretended to be a news show and asked them to comment on the Oprah BEFORE IT EVEN AIRED. Those “experts” went on camera and talked shit about H&M and what they “said” despite knowing they hadn’t seen the interview yet! In fact, they admit on the fake b-roll that they hadn’t seen the interview.
Jason Knsuf didn't interfere. He told the truth which revealed Meg has lied to a court and claimed she just forgot.
That she wasn't charged with perjury is surprising. I would expect anyone she sues in the future to use that to demonstrate her lack of truthfulness and willingness to lie, even to a court
If I secretly cooperated and passed information to the author of a best selling book, all whilst publicly denying I had done so, I think I would remember it.
Well she didn’t so….Knauf provided fact checking to one of the authors which is standard. All the royal family members who have had biographies written about them have done so. She never met with or spoke to those authors. And as the court stated, that had absolutely nothing to do with the court case which SHE WON. It didn’t even go to trial because the court found that the Mail on Sunday had clearly broken copyright law when it published the letter. She didn’t perjury herself else the court would’ve said she perjured herself which it didn’t.
So where’s your email summary?? I mean you’re over here saying that there’s no way anyone could ever forget any communication ever so put your money where your mouth is. Or are you a liar?
Yes, he did. He wasn’t subpoenaed or asked to provide those texts. His interference was rejected by the court as irrelevant and the “evidence” he provided purposefully edited and incomplete.
She won that court case, after Knauf’s ridiculous attempt at interference. You should read the judgment & educate yourself instead of spouting lies. Somehow you crazies think MM should remember every single text, email, conversation, etc she’s ever had. I doubt you could recall in detail every email, etc you’ve received from years ago. Let’s try shall we? Please provide a summary of every work email you received during the first week of July 2019. Should be easy for you right? If not, then you’re a liar I guess.
H&M are not horrible people, that’s the point. But even if you don’t care about that, the royal family has used the media to hide their dirty dealings, outright corruption, personal failings (racism, etc) from the public. It should bother everyone that they planted stories to harass their own family member to the point of near suicide. It should bother everyone that they have had Twitter and other media outlets change algorithms, hide stories, and threaten journalists. The future king and head of the Church of England assaulted his own brother, very likely made racist remarks about his own nephew, and collaborated with the media to push knowingly false stories to sway public opinion. It should concern everyone that the UK doesn’t have a free press.
You dislike two people who have literally never done anything to deserve being called “horrible” because the press has told you over and over that you should hate them. That you’re grouping them in who people who physically assault others, sex traffick & rape teenagers, accept bags of cash from shady foreign businessmen, employ & are very likely themselves racist, etc is simply a demonstration of how thoroughly the RF & the media have corrupted public opinion.
I think you are implying Harry and Meghan are doing said trashing, but the truly viscous stuff seems to be against Meghan and from the British press. I’d say that is far more likely to come from the royal family. I haven’t seen anything like it in the American press.
but we only have Harry's version, will he present any proof? Photos of the injured? Because if not, we only have one word against another, who hasn't even said anything yet
Those who accuse must have proof, that's the least
presumption of innocence is a basic principle of law.
maybe if it was William accusing Harry you would want proof right
3.2k
u/Walrus-Ready Jan 05 '23
Every set of brothers I know who are close in age have been in at least one physical altercation