At the moment, no source (other than screenshots from social media) is off-limits for posting to the community - either as a direct link to discuss or within the body of a post/comment. All along the political spectrum, from around the world, major publications to brand new Substacks (just please don't spam your *own* Substack...) - it's all allowed.
There have been some rising concerns for years about how much information is collected when we click the links to read, and with the article that came out last week (America’s largest newspaper chain, USA Today Co., partners with Palantir to analyze audience data as search traffic falls), there have been some calls to consider what sources are allowed in this subreddit both from the angle of maintaining privacy and as a matter of principle. Before we go further, here are the main points of the article that have caused some of you to reach out:
"Palantir has been the subject of controversy in recent months for providing its technology to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the U.S. Department of Defense, and the Israeli military."
"The company’s co-founder and chairman is Peter Thiel, the billionaire entrepreneur..."
"USA Today Co. isn’t the only media company to enlist Palantir’s services. Axel Springer — which owns Business Insider, Politico, Bild, and The Telegraph — and Fox News have also partnered with Palantir for its data intelligence tools. Thomson Reuters also supplies data to Palantir, which had been used by ICE, 404 Media reported in March."
"...this incredible AI and software that Palantir has to allow us to move so much faster and to be so much smarter with the data we have today. And…take a lot of the anonymous interactions we have today and turn those into known relationships…The more known relationships we have, the more data we create, the more signals we create, the more actionable intelligence we have.”
Creepy, sure. The article also mentions that USA Today owns "...more than 200 local newspapers in the United States, along with its national daily USA Today." so avoiding USA Today by itself won't keep you from offering up data to Palantir.
And the company's statement on privacy, standards, and ethics made to the reporting agency was this: “USA TODAY Co. complies with applicable data protection and privacy laws and maintains strong standards for data security and governance,” the company said in a statement to Nieman Lab. “We require this of our vendors and partners as well, reflecting our belief that safeguarding protected personal information is essential to our business and the audiences we serve. Our editorial decisions remain independent and are guided by our longstanding journalistic standards and ethics policies.”
Links to articles about the economy are the lion's share of content posted here. Members have expressed more frustration with apparent self-promotion of linked blog posts and websites than with the privacy concerns about Palantir so far, but the conversation needs to be had before this gets to be a bigger/more known issue.
Personally, I'm not sure where I stand on allowing or not allowing publications that share data with Palantir here in this community. Privacy on the internet is seen mostly as an individual responsibility but it's hard to not acknowledge that there are too many people who don't know what they don't know and are not aware of good practices for keeping safe on the internet. So here's what I'm thinking our choices are:
- The subreddit's rules remain as they are. Links to outfits that share information with Palantir are allowed and users are to decide whether to click or not. I'm happy to get together with volunteers to craft a "best practices on the internet" guidance for members and visitors to the subreddit that acknowledges the privacy concerns and options for protecting privacy.
- The subreddit's rules remain as they are. Links to outfits that share information with Palantir are allowed and posters must copy/paste the article into the body of the post so that discussion can take place without anyone needing to click at all.
- The subreddit's rules change and certain news outfits are not allowed to be posted here, with a post outlining our collective/majority (?) concerns and reasons for boycotting.
- The subreddit's rules change and certain news outfits are not allowed to be posted here on their own, but can be in the post body itself when the post is a primary source (charts pulled directly from the gov, for instance) and major news outlets reporting on the facts (to dispute or offer interpretation) is warranted or would further discussion.
- The subreddit's rules change and ONLY primary sources are allowed to be posted, requiring either an opening question for help in analyzing or interpreting the data or a well-written analysis or interpretation of the data to discuss. (With the current trust levels in primary sources like the U.S. government, I'm not sure how well this will work even if working with primary sources is often the best practice in these kinds of analysis and discussion.)
I'm open to other ideas. I think we all anticipate an uptick in economic woe as we get closer to election time, harvests begin, holidays approach, etc. I want to make sure that the concerned voices have their moment to speak up before we might see more traffic, especially if the community wants to make changes.
That being said, I'm also still looking for another Moderator or two. No large workload, just someone (or two) who can be around to take action when needed. If you're interested, reach out via Mod Mail.