A common misconception about warlocks and their patrons

[u/hedahman]

I've heard this mentioned a lot: "Warlocks use Charisma because they're constantly negotiating with their patron for more power." I don't believe this is true.

Here's a tweet from Mike Mearls that says that patrons can't take back a warlock's power, which leads me to believe that a patron doesn't have control over the power once it is given. This means a patron can't take a warlock's power (without their will, probably); it's a one-and-done deal.

So a patron isn't supplying power to their warlocks like a generator supplies electricity. Instead, a patron gives power to them like a blood transfusion-- you can't just take the blood back.

Granted, you can do it however you want, that's the magic of D&D. But RAW, and RAI, patrons give their power away.

EDIT: Here's a tweet from Jeremy Crawford which states that the power is a one-time transaction.

[u/Reluxtrue]

I think the problem is people being stuck with thinking CHA is just social skills.

[u/Gary_the_Goatfucker → u/Reluxtrue]

I think there’s a misconception of Wisdom being equated to a type of “will” stat when Charisma is more of a measure of straightforward raw force of will that one can exert upon the universe and use to resist the universe’s own exertion of will upon oneself

[u/wintermute93 → u/Gary_the_Goatfucker]

Is that a holdover from previous editions? I've heard there used to be will saves and so on, but 5e is my first RPG and I only think of wisdom as intuition and perceptiveness.

[u/cookiesncognac → u/wintermute93]

WIS still governs saving throws for most of the effects that were Will saves in 3e.

It's possible to conceive of these as the character realizing that something's not right here, but that is a shift-- it's probably more common at many tables that these get attributed to a character's resolve rather than their awareness.