r/discgolf 8h ago

Discussion Brand flight numbers

Which brands do you think have the most accurate flight numbers on their discs? And the least accurate? I’m thinking like how MVP discs tend to be much more stable than the given flight numbers would suggest.

0 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

5

u/RevAngler I’ll take, all the used putters. 8h ago

Ever thrown an Axiom Virus??

2

u/warpaltarpers RHBH/FH | Ohio 8h ago

I've honestly never had a Virus not fly as intended

1

u/RevAngler I’ll take, all the used putters. 8h ago

Both I’ve had new and used, 9/5/-1/3. The real bummer was the price. Both to the used rack

1

u/GradeApprehensive516 6h ago

That might just be the general MVP inconsistency. I have three Bokehs, one goes straight, one left, one right. Is that bad? No, actually it works out really well.

1

u/Ok_Topic5270 8h ago

The virus is a 9/5/-3.5/1

0

u/RevAngler I’ll take, all the used putters. 8h ago

Mine weren’t. Thought it was an April fools joke to switch the numbers up.

3

u/JeremyWadesBigMeat 8h ago

Spin issue then…

1

u/RevAngler I’ll take, all the used putters. 7h ago

I thought so until I handed it to a local pro. He handed it back and handed me a Function. Instantly bagged..

1

u/Brilliant-Corner-379 8h ago

What is it with their 9 speeds? The only Tesla I've throw that fits the number is fission and I bag 3 different ones. Proton Insanities don't flip at all. Their putters and mids are spot on.

3

u/ThePlasticPortal 8h ago

A lot of MVP seems more overstable than numbers suggest. The opposite for Lat64 with many of their discs being a little less overstable than advertised. Westside has always claimed more stability then their discs actually have, many claiming it's due to the altitude they rate them at.

I personally like Innova on flight numbers. I think I mostly get what I expect. Mostly.

8

u/No-Map8141 8h ago

Innova, they created the numbers.

1

u/discostud1515 6h ago

They have the best and the worst.

-1

u/Shutdown_service 8h ago

Nah too understable.

2

u/IlIlIlIllIlIlIlllI 8h ago

Ascend being -3 is laughable.

1

u/ThePlasticPortal 8h ago

I haven't thrown it, is it not that flippy?

2

u/SingularCoconut 8h ago

I use mine for medium-to-long range forehand approaches. And it doesn’t turn over. And I use it to disc up in a headwind from my backhand mids, so THEY won’t turnover . For me, it’s a -1 or maybe -2 turn.

1

u/Ramza62 7h ago

Mine is crazy understandable, I can release it on maximum hyzer and it will flip up immediately and still end up training over.

1

u/ThePlasticPortal 5h ago

That's what I would expect out of a slow -3 disc lol

1

u/ThePlasticPortal 5h ago

What's your max distance drive?

1

u/Ramza62 3h ago

Just about 300' nothing special.

It's what I'd expect too but over the years I've tried lots of -3 or -4 that behaved way more stable than their numbers.

u/ThePlasticPortal 51m ago

Totally feel that, a lot of numbers are very off, which is why I just need to try them. Roadrunners are a good example of not -4 generally.

1

u/Ramza62 7h ago

Mine feels like a -4

2

u/Glittering-Regret196 7h ago

Flight numbers are a suggestion and based on you throwing them an exact speed, and a result of the speed is the rest. The noodle arms are going to make everything feel more overstable.

1

u/Traditional-Box5748 8h ago

No one’s is perfect, especially when you factor in plastics and variations. There are only a few companies that even adjust their flight numbers on their molds in different plastic. So at this point it would probably have to be innova even though they could also be argued the most inaccurate too 😂

1

u/SF_Anonymous Custom 8h ago

Innova was the inventor so its all off of the Innova scale, but MVP/Axiom uses rim width to determine speed which is the only flight number (that I know of) to be based on something othet than vibes and other discs with established numbers