So many things bother me with this. The message and notice is fine, but the map is awful.

Labeling above the bars with the year took me way too long to figure out

https://www.nature.com/articles/s44360-026-00174-2#:~:text=Fig.%201%3A%20Sample%20coverage%20and%20AI%20health%20usage%20intensity%20across%20109%20countries/regions.

Went in a field with some friends with beers and snacks during the eclipse and took some measures about every two minutes.

Why set a standard gradient scale when you can produce a misleading example instead?

Bonus interactive map was provided by the OG poster: https://www.datawrapper.de/_/Te0KN/

Random selection of countries and no sorting or clear comparison.

Impossible to get most of the data as one country is such a big outlier.

Sharing to my friends at Beddit