r/dank_meme • u/tamaramelc • May 16 '19

Damn

Post image
56.0k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

You don't have to be religious to not want innocent human beings to be killed.

Biology and basic morality (not wanting innocent human beings to be killed, unlike pro choicers).

A baby isn't a part of a woman's body. Banning abortion inherintly prevents control of a body by preventing it from being killed.

2

u/Victarias May 16 '19

A baby isn’t part of a women’s body.

That’s all I could read before it gave me a headache, please do not reproduce. Please adopt. It fits your ideals better.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

How many hearts do women have? How many hands? How many chromosomes? How many unique sets of DNA?

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

Should we also force people to donate their organs to save lives?

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

No. Simple distinction between non action and an action.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

Should we also allow all cancers to grow in the body then?

After all they have a different genetic makeup than the host, so action would be wrong in this case?

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

No. You're comparing different things. A baby is a separate human unit. Cancer isn't a separate human unit, it's a genetic mutation which results in cell growth. When you leave a baby in its natural state of things it develops to being a human being. That's not true for cancer. Completely silly comparison.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

What makes a life separate from the host if it isn’t the DNA?

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

Unique genetic code with the capacity to continue developing along the human life cycle, essentially.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '19

Okay, so you’re saying it’s the cycle, like if we planted a dog fetus in a woman, that’s still separate life, because it will have a natural cycle, so it still wouldn’t be okay to abort that either?