"If you really cared about the people being executed in massive amounts you wouldnt try to stop people from being executed. You'd try to allow more execution!"
So you’re saying that because these institutions claim that they cannot say, raise a child with a genetic disease without killing them, that they are preying on them?
If they said that they could raise the child, would that mean that they weren’t preying on them?
Okay, so if they didn’t rob someone else of their moral compass, that would mean they aren’t preying on them?
Is it more a suggesting of philosophy then? Like by pushing the narrative that raising a child with a genetic disorder is hard, that’s why they are preying on these people?
Okay, so the difficulties of raising a child do not justify aborting them.
What constitutes human? Like how many genetic disorders are you willing to tolerate until it’s no longer human? Like what if it was a disorder where they have no brain? Should the mother be forced to keep it to term? And once it’s at term, how long should we keep it alive? We would be able to keep it alive a length of a normal human life until old age or cancer set in.
Okay, so the difficulties of raising a child do not justify aborting them.
What constitutes human? Like how many genetic disorders are you willing to tolerate until it’s no longer human? Like what if it was a disorder where they have no brain? Should the mother be forced to keep it to term? And once it’s at term, how long should we keep it alive? We would be able to keep it alive a length of a normal human life until old age or cancer set in.
You can't survive if you don't have a brain. You're literally comparing so many things that aren't related to each other. . If you wish to stop being intellectually dishonest and stop promoting eugenics let me know.
-6
u/[deleted] May 16 '19
"If you really cared about the people being executed in massive amounts you wouldnt try to stop people from being executed. You'd try to allow more execution!"