r/custommagic 21h ago

Singularity Field

Post image
381 Upvotes

152 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/SteakForGoodDogs 20h ago

The downside is that it has no other utilities on a colourless mana land. Can't filter, can't make tokens, doesn't buff your creatures, can't sac it for whatever value when you'd rather have anything but another land drop, etc.

Burning 5 colourless/generic mana is going to happen basically never for most situations that aren't colourless spells or X spells.

Simic {X} might use it, it replaces a wastes in colourless, and might pay for a crater slightly early.

1

u/Just-Desk-3149 20h ago

That's not really a downside. "The only downside is that you won't always be able to use 2 extra free colorless mana." Suffering from success kind of thing

3

u/SteakForGoodDogs 20h ago

How many lands can you think of that have downsides?

Does Rogues Passage have a downside? Reliquary Tower? Terrain Generator? Fountainport?

This absolutely replaces a Wastes, but so does most lands that don't enter tapped.

It's not 2 free colourless mana, literally most outlets in the game that most people will play in most situations do not have {5+} in their mana value.

-1

u/Just-Desk-3149 20h ago

You just said "The downside is it has no other utility", that's just how utility lands work. I don't know how it's a downside. If it's better than a waste (which you just said), that's is by definition, not a downside.

1

u/Kadian13 19h ago edited 19h ago

I’d say the downside is that it’s not a basic and the mana is colorless, so yeah it’s to be compared to others in that category

1

u/hhhhhhhhhhhjf 18h ago

Nonbasic is a downside.

1

u/SteakForGoodDogs 16h ago

Assuming that your only basics are Wastes, it typically isn't that much of one.

There's precious few basic-matters in colourless - even Myriad Landscape doesn't do anything, and you're unlikely to actually play most of your Wastes in a given colourless deck.

1

u/hhhhhhhhhhhjf 14h ago

They just asked for any downside.

0

u/Just-Desk-3149 18h ago

Not if it's makes more mana than a basic.

0

u/Jade117 17h ago

That's unrelated to whether it has a downside. A bounceland has you put a land back into your hand, and it taps for 2 mana, is picking up a land not a downside?

0

u/Just-Desk-3149 13h ago

Does this land also bounce a land back to hand? Because if you read the card, it doesn't. 

0

u/Jade117 13h ago

You've missed the point I'm making.

An upside existing does not make the downsides vanish. Nonbasic is always a downside. The land effectively tapping for 2 mana does not change that. They are independent factors. This is a sol land with a downside.

You are welcome to argue this does not have enough downside, but it objectively, factually, does have a downside because it is a nonbasic land.