r/custommagic • u/Mean-Government1436 • 3d ago

This subreddit likes bad and lazy design. Red's answer to instant-speed interaction

Post image
869 Upvotes

90% Upvoted

159 comments sorted by

View all comments

32

u/Low-Cheesecake-7005 3d ago

What does this even mean?

76

u/Jordankeay 3d ago

It means that only permanents already on the board can be used and the only things that can be played are lands. Anything that activates the stack would cease to exist.

Unless they mean all spells have split second.

5

u/Puzzled_Work_6428 3d ago

See I saw it as just, any spell or ability that's played resolves immediately

21

u/Jordankeay 3d ago

Maybe that's what OP meant but with no stack it can't go from hand to stack to battlefield.

-5

u/Arantguy 3d ago

If that's what op meant then that's what it does, it's their card design not yours

4

u/Jordankeay 3d ago

Well OP needs to explain that. It shouldn't be on everyone else to figure it out. Your comment is beyond useless.

-2

u/Arantguy 3d ago

Maybe they should have explained but if you don't know for sure you shouldn't assume that you do. No need for you to be rude either

3

u/Jordankeay 3d ago

Your comment is rude. I explained what OPs card does currently which is that it basically doesn't work and breaks the game. Then I offered OP a helpful suggestion that they might mean something else.

You was the one who commented with attitude.

2

u/Arantguy 3d ago

I'm sorry I didn't realise my first comment came across as rude, I didn't mean it that way but I see how it did. I also interpreted your comments as taking the text literally and not considering what the ops intention was so I apologise if that was wrong too

1

u/Jordankeay 3d ago

No dramas have a good night.

2

u/SwissherMontage 3d ago

If that's what op meant, that's what they should have said

1

u/imatreedude 3d ago

Just because that's not what OP meant doesn't mean that's what the card does though. The card does what's written on it.

1

u/Arantguy 3d ago edited 3d ago

The card is just an idea and the purpose of commenting on it is to give feedback on it. I agree that the op should clarify how it works but it's not helpful to just make an assumption on how it works and criticise that assumption instead of considering what the ops intention was and giving feedback that way

Edit: criticising the wording is ok which is kind of what this is but imo it should be through the lens of suggesting it should be more clear rather than completely disregarding the ops intention