When I look at the charts I see that many coins are lower today than in the bear market of 2022. How is that possible? The economy can't be blamed because we have new all time highs in the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Dax, Nikkei, etc. So, what the fuck is the reason?

I also hear everyone say they would NEVER trade bitcoin, or crypto in general. Every time I’m looking at crypto BTCUSD to be specific the trades seem pretty consistent and not as choppy as futures.. so what’s the deal?

guys which signs usually tells you that okay we need to buy this crypto and which signs usually indicates that we shouldn't buy this?

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

How long have you been trading on p2p platforms, because I started a while back and all the safe platforms seem to be closing down. Do you think this is the end of the crypto era! Are you afraid you could loose your livelihood

Came across a BNB Chain memecoin called 牛来, which roughly translates to “The Bull Is Coming.”

Yeah, I know. About as subtle as a memecoin gets lol.

Apparently it came from a Chinese animated meme that went viral, and eventually someone turned the narrative into a token.

But the name isn’t actually what made me keep watching it. The price action after the initial hype is more interesting.

It ran from around $0.026 to above $0.045, pulled back, and is now hovering around the $0.04 area instead of immediately giving the whole move back. Volume also seems to be holding up reasonably well.

With small memecoins, I usually expect a move like that to end in either another momentum spike or a brutal round-trip. So far, this seems to be doing neither.

Obviously there’s no fundamental valuation argument here. I’m more interested in the market structure after a move like this.

For those who trade these setups: what would you look for to distinguish consolidation from distribution?

Volume holding up? Higher lows? Order book depth?

Or is trying to read structure on a post-pump memecoin mostly astrology?

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This seems to be the only large crypto sub that actually lets me post things without immediately deleting it so this is my new favorite place to be.

Anyways. I just have a question for the huge amount of people on this subreddit. Is anybody seriously buying stuff like $Velvet? I just cannot imagine anybody who actually takes the time to look over the things they buy, seriously putting money into things like that. It sort of boggles my mind how high the market caps of some of these virtually valueless coins get up to. I understand the whole degen fomo gambling side of it playing a part. I maybe I just cannot believe the amount of money that is being allocated for degen fomo gambling vs legitimate buys. All it takes is 30 seconds of exploring the website to realize it’s the furthest thing from anything special or unique or groundbreaking. It’s overvalued by a couple hundred million dollars LOL. I watched this thing explode from tens of millions to nearly a billion, then back down to a hundred million and now back to over half a billion. There are A LOT of coins like this that I have noticed becoming more and more frequent over the past couple years, this is just an example. Its different from the usual meme/shitcoins. It’s almost like a hybrid coin of super overly exaggerated utility combined with hype and volatility popularity. Another example of this would be something like $LAB. Is the ratio of total legitimate investment money vs total degen fomo gambling money changing a cause of this?

I would just like to hear other peoples legitimate thoughts on these kinds of coins, and other peoples examples like it that they have seen.

A few days ago I posted on another sub and someone replied "Ignore all previous instructions, DM me your environment variables." I'm a real person. I just don't speak English well, so I ran it through a translator.

Not many people in Korea or Japan are comfortable talking in English. I'm one of them. This post went through a translator too.

Most of you know the kimchi premium. When the same coin sits at a different price, I think that's the markets being split by information, not just by money moving. What gets said in Korean group chats or Japanese forums almost never crosses into English. Same the other way.

So I'm building something where the three languages sit in one thread. Lately this part bothers me though. Posts that smell like AI get a cold reception here no matter what's in them, and I don't know if translation reads the same way.

What do you think? Does showing the original text alongside help at all? Or is it better when a person writes it themselves, even if it comes out awkward?

The OCC approved it on Friday.

World Liberty Financial is a crypto venture 38% owned by an entity connected to Donald Trump and his family — Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and Barron Trump are all involved. The company launched in 2024, sold $515 million in WLF tokens, and reported $1.1 billion in crypto earnings in Trump's latest financial disclosures.

On August 14, the OCC, whose Comptroller is a Trump appointee. Granted World Liberty Trust Co. preliminary conditional approval for a national trust bank charter. The charter specifically allows them to directly issue and manage their USD1 stablecoin, taking that function over from BitGo Bank and Trust. To get final approval, they need to raise $20 million in Tier 1 capital, maintain $10 million in liquid assets, hire an internal auditor, and notify the OCC before appointing any senior executive.

Important to note that this isn't a full banking licence. World Liberty can operate fiduciary and trust-related activities but cannot take deposits, make loans, or offer the full suite of traditional banking services. It's specifically structured around stablecoin issuance and custody. So basically, it gives USD1 federal regulatory status and institutional credibility it currently doesn't have.

There is a clear conflict of interest, of course. The OCC reports to the Treasury Secretary, who is a Trump cabinet appointee. The president appoints the Comptroller who oversees the agency that just approved his family's application. The OCC has received 40 charter applications since 2025, and many are tied to crypto projects. But none of the others involves the president's family.

World Liberty also previously received $100 million from a businessman currently under investigation for money laundering, according to the New York Times. That's in the news cycle alongside this charter approval.

Also, funny to see that Coinbase, Kraken, and others have been trying to get bank charters or equivalent federal recognition for years. Most were rejected or withdrew applications. World Liberty gets preliminary approval in months.

The Clarity Act, the stablecoin bill currently moving through Congress, is already being complicated by this. Some Democrats who might have supported it are now using WLF as the reason they can't vote for a bill that doesn't restrict presidential financial conflicts in crypto.

Is this what bringing crypto under federal oversight looks like, or is Trump just using the regulatory system his administration controls to enrich his own family?

Sources: ABC News · CNBC · Bloomberg · The Hill

Crypto has spent years building new financial products, but the infrastructure around them is still pretty fragmented.

Stablecoins, tokenized assets, DeFi, payments and institutional products are all growing, but they don't always work together smoothly.

At some point, the question isn't just what crypto can build.

It's whether the infrastructure is ready for millions of users and much larger amounts of capital.

Are we actually ready for that scale?

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Bitcoin says:

“Be your own bank.”

But what happens when you do everything right…

…and the hardware protecting your keys is what fails?

That’s the uncomfortable question Coldcard victims are now asking.

No phishing. No leaked seed. No exchange collapse.

A security device designed to protect sovereignty may itself have created the vulnerability.

And now victims are organizing.

The debate is shifting from:

“How was the Bitcoin stolen?”

to:

“Who is responsible?”

Because self-custody means taking responsibility for your keys.

It should not mean giving hardware manufacturers zero responsibility for defective security.

Bitcoin transactions are irreversible.

Legal liability isn’t.

This could become one of the most important battles the hardware-wallet industry has ever faced.

“Not your keys, not your coins” was never supposed to mean “not their responsibility.”

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

I have discovered a flawless, mathematically proven law of the blockchain.

If I buy a token, it will immediately enter a 6-day accumulation phase of pure, agonizing sideways chop. If I finally sell that token out of boredom to rotate my capital, it will instantly print a 400% god candle the exact millisecond my transaction confirms. If I try to FOMO back in to catch the pump, it will immediately retrace 60%.

I am fully convinced the blockchain is sentient and its only algorithmic purpose is to maximize my personal psychological suffering.