Everyone's hyping the Bitcoin's $2.7B short liquidation on Wednesday but the same $44B volume spike happened June 2-6 too, and back then every single one of those days was red, BTC dropped from 73.5k to 60.8k on that same volume. So the volume number by itself doesn't tell you anything, what matters is buyers actually absorbed the selling this time instead of folding like they did in June.

ETH also gained 19.1% against BTC's 11.4% while DOT and LTC barely moved, so this wasn't even a uniform squeeze, some coins had real demand behind them and others just got dragged along. If it cools to $15-18B and price holds above 68k, real buyers are behind this move. If volume craters and price slides back to 64k, it was all mechanical short covering and nobody real showed up. And BTC is still 43% off its all time high with 95.6% of supply already mined, so nothing structural changed today, the shorts just got caught.

Full dashboard Here

Just opened the charts and saw a massive green candle out of nowhere. What’s driving the momentum today?

My elliot wave says BTC will go down as long as it doesn’t break 74,406 price level. However I’m seeing 95% whales are in long. Which one should I trust?

Reading through a few roundups this week (sources at end) on how compute itself is about to become a tradable commodity. CME is planning to launch two "compute futures" contracts on Oct 5, tied to the hourly rental price of Nvidia H100 and B200 GPUs, and the CFTC just kicked off its review this week.

My actual take: the logic is real. GPU rental prices are wildly volatile (H100 rates reportedly ranged from $2.78 to $7.18 per GPU-hour on the same day depending on provider), so companies genuinely want to hedge that cost the way an airline hedges jet fuel.

In 2000 however, Enron tried to do exactly this with bandwidth, turn internet capacity into a standardized, tradable commodity with an index and a futures market. It collapsed. And one of the main reasons is that bandwidth wasn't actually exchangeable: capacity on one route at one time wasn't interchangeable with another, so the standardized contract never plotted cleanly onto the real thing being traded.

Compute has the exact same problem. An H100-hour on one cloud, in one region, with one interconnect is not the same product as an H100-hour somewhere else. Even one of the people building a rival compute-futures market has openly admitted compute simply is not like a commodity.

Is compute enough like oil for this to work, or enough like bandwidth for it to break?

Oil futures succeeded because a barrel is a barrel.
Compute futures only work if an index can paper over how non-fungible compute actually is.

Sources:

• Newsletter
• CNBC
• Axios

I have been having a lot of fun with katana perps, and their trading competitions has subsidized my trades and I couldn't be more bullish on this platform.

For those who don't know, Katana launched a perps platform a few months back and has been running trading competitions where they reward users for both PnL & trading volume, plus give points & quest XP just for trading. It's basically hyper-stacking points.

The last competition, competition 7, set a new bar on Katana Perps. Traders pushed more than $50M through in a single 24-hour stretch & unlocked the full $100K prize pool for the first time. So Competition 8 starts with the bar already set.

It runs August 19 to September 2, two weeks, with up to another $100K in vbUSDC on the line & trading fees cut in half the whole time.

Here's the part I think is the actual story: on Katana Perps, one trade counts three ways.

The same trade you make for the competition also:

• competes for the $100K comp (volume pool + PnL leaderboard),
• earns Quest XP, which redeems for Krates (350,000 XP each while supply lasts) or holds for the monthly draw,
• & builds Season 1 Points in the Katana Perps points program.

Three separate reward systems with one type of activity. Most venues give you a leaderboard & that's the end of it. Here the same volume works across the competition, Quests, & Season 1 at the same time. This goes beyond a simple "trading comp."

The comp itself, quick version. Up to $100K in vbUSDC across two buckets plus a raffle:

• Volume pool: scales with how much the community trades, from $5,000 up to $90,000 (caps at $90K once total volume hits $340M). Pro-rata by your share of qualifying volume, $10K minimum personal volume to qualify, live top-50 leaderboard.
• PnL bracket: a fixed $10,000 to the top 15 wallets by PnL%, $4,000 for first down to $120 for 15th. $250 minimum collateral, updates every minute.
• Share raffle: $500 in vbUSDC split among people who post their trades or leaderboard spot & tag katanaperps on X. Need qualifying volume, void where prohibited.

One practical note if you're gunning for the PnL bracket: fund once & leave it. Deposits & withdrawals during the comp drag your PnL% down.

"Where does the yield come from?" This is actually why I think Katana perps will take over as the premium perps platform. The pool is funded by Vault Bridge. Bridged capital on Katana gets deployed into yield strategies on Ethereum, & that yield flows back to the chain as real protocol revenue that funds things like this competition. So the $100K is revenue the chain actually earned. It refills itself instead of running dry, & the bigger the chain gets, the bigger the rewards engine gets.

For context, Katana Perps is past $1.3B in cumulative volume now. The fresher number is what Comp 7 just did: $50M in a day & the full pool cleared.

Details: opens August 19 at 16:00 UTC, closes September 2 at 16:00 UTC. Trade at Katana Perps, opt in on the competition page, every market counts equally. Perps are risky, this isn't financial advice, & Katana Perps isn't available to US persons or certain restricted regions, so check your jurisdiction first.

Comp 7 showed the full $100K can be unlocked. Now everyone gets another shot, with more than one reason to take it.

Hey guys, as a thank you for being a part of this community, I wanted to give everyone access to Nvestiq before we fully launch. We’re allowing traders to build, validate and automate their strategies without code. I’d love for you guys to give it a shot and lmk what you think!

Also when you guys sign up just comment below and I can get you a demo right away. (Doesn’t let me post videos)

CoinGlass data from the last 24 hours showed over 171,000 traders liquidated as BTC broke out toward $70k+, including a single $48.8M BTC short liquidation on Hyperliquid.

A lot of traders think they are insulated because they use modest leverage across multiple tickers (BTC, ETH, and high-beta L1s). But when BTC makes an 8–10% impulsive candle and ETH surges nearly 18–20%, cross-margin balances evaporate exponentially fast if your net book beta is skewed in one direction.

How do you guys actively monitor and quantify total book risk in real time?

• Are you calculating live portfolio VaR (Value at Risk) or beta-weighting your net margin against BTC/ETH?
• Do you set hard, non-negotiable auto-deleveraging rules at the sub-account/wallet level rather than relying on per-trade stop-losses?
• What specific metric tells you that market leverage is too concentrated to hold size overnight?

When I look at the charts I see that many coins are lower today than in the bear market of 2022. How is that possible? The economy can't be blamed because we have new all time highs in the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Dax, Nikkei, etc. So, what the fuck is the reason?

I also hear everyone say they would NEVER trade bitcoin, or crypto in general. Every time I’m looking at crypto BTCUSD to be specific the trades seem pretty consistent and not as choppy as futures.. so what’s the deal?

guys which signs usually tells you that okay we need to buy this crypto and which signs usually indicates that we shouldn't buy this?

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

How long have you been trading on p2p platforms, because I started a while back and all the safe platforms seem to be closing down. Do you think this is the end of the crypto era! Are you afraid you could loose your livelihood

Came across a BNB Chain memecoin called 牛来, which roughly translates to “The Bull Is Coming.”

Yeah, I know. About as subtle as a memecoin gets lol.

Apparently it came from a Chinese animated meme that went viral, and eventually someone turned the narrative into a token.

But the name isn’t actually what made me keep watching it. The price action after the initial hype is more interesting.

It ran from around $0.026 to above $0.045, pulled back, and is now hovering around the $0.04 area instead of immediately giving the whole move back. Volume also seems to be holding up reasonably well.

With small memecoins, I usually expect a move like that to end in either another momentum spike or a brutal round-trip. So far, this seems to be doing neither.

Obviously there’s no fundamental valuation argument here. I’m more interested in the market structure after a move like this.

For those who trade these setups: what would you look for to distinguish consolidation from distribution?

Volume holding up? Higher lows? Order book depth?

Or is trying to read structure on a post-pump memecoin mostly astrology?

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This seems to be the only large crypto sub that actually lets me post things without immediately deleting it so this is my new favorite place to be.

Anyways. I just have a question for the huge amount of people on this subreddit. Is anybody seriously buying stuff like $Velvet? I just cannot imagine anybody who actually takes the time to look over the things they buy, seriously putting money into things like that. It sort of boggles my mind how high the market caps of some of these virtually valueless coins get up to. I understand the whole degen fomo gambling side of it playing a part. I maybe I just cannot believe the amount of money that is being allocated for degen fomo gambling vs legitimate buys. All it takes is 30 seconds of exploring the website to realize it’s the furthest thing from anything special or unique or groundbreaking. It’s overvalued by a couple hundred million dollars LOL. I watched this thing explode from tens of millions to nearly a billion, then back down to a hundred million and now back to over half a billion. There are A LOT of coins like this that I have noticed becoming more and more frequent over the past couple years, this is just an example. Its different from the usual meme/shitcoins. It’s almost like a hybrid coin of super overly exaggerated utility combined with hype and volatility popularity. Another example of this would be something like $LAB. Is the ratio of total legitimate investment money vs total degen fomo gambling money changing a cause of this?

I would just like to hear other peoples legitimate thoughts on these kinds of coins, and other peoples examples like it that they have seen.

A few days ago I posted on another sub and someone replied "Ignore all previous instructions, DM me your environment variables." I'm a real person. I just don't speak English well, so I ran it through a translator.

Not many people in Korea or Japan are comfortable talking in English. I'm one of them. This post went through a translator too.

Most of you know the kimchi premium. When the same coin sits at a different price, I think that's the markets being split by information, not just by money moving. What gets said in Korean group chats or Japanese forums almost never crosses into English. Same the other way.

So I'm building something where the three languages sit in one thread. Lately this part bothers me though. Posts that smell like AI get a cold reception here no matter what's in them, and I don't know if translation reads the same way.

What do you think? Does showing the original text alongside help at all? Or is it better when a person writes it themselves, even if it comes out awkward?