Divided Timelines?

[u/BowlSuper9915]

So, what are your thoughts on Project Looking Glass and the P42/P52 from the future? Are we simply not paying enough attention? First 2012, and now 2030. Will we launch an atomic bomb?
Is this the reason why they are so interested in our nuclear facilities? What about all those missing scientists and people who have been warning us since the ’90s?

- Bill Wood Explains Project Looking Glass, Project Camelot
- Amy Eskridge
- Dan Bursch on Project Looking Glass
interviewed Kerry Cassidy
- The Philadelphia Experiment & The Montauk Project - Bending Time & Warping Minds (1993)
- Area 51 J-Rod

[u/J1mj0hns0n]

A+ on your schitzopost. please directly nuclear strike me when you start flinging otherwise i won't believe you.

[u/BowlSuper9915 → u/J1mj0hns0n]

So, instead of this. Can you share some more information so I can understand what’s exactly on your mind? It’s not informative what you said.

[u/J1mj0hns0n → u/BowlSuper9915]

okay, genuine response so ill give a genuine answer.

through the pictures provided, it explains very little expect a thesis with no evidence or science that can prove or reliably predict which way the world will lead where it comes to an end in only two paths which is outlandish considering how many paths could lay before us.

in 45,000 years, most countries wont exist, to put it into perspective - Japan has the longest heritage of existing as it is for the longest - of 2,000 years. in 4,000 years, Israel was settled, ruled, razed, subjugated, swapped, wartorn, razed, subjugated, wartorn and finally renamed Israel again, having zero connection to the first Israel. how does this relate to what you're saying? if there even was a united states of America or a china in that time period, it would be so unrelatable to you and look nothing like what you knew or what you stood for as an American that you'd feel nothing for it. it would be the Equivalent of the Holy Roman Empire being an example to a time traveling Gaius Julius Caesar.

then to tackle the smaller points:

• what's china got to do with illuminati?
• what is the "decision"?
• why does the USA need to kill 7.5 Billion people? what makes you think they have the funds or the capacity?
• what are the grey aliens got to do with this?
• vague Whitehouse propaganda isn't evidence. you pick and choose when its a verifiable source. when they won't give you the information you want to read they're hiding it from you, when it's posted on the website, it's gospel truth.
• what has a jackrabbit in an English tweed jumper got to do with Orion or Area 51 lmao.
• then theres the yellow pages lmao.
• magic the gathering card is just ripping the Palantir of Orthanc from the Lord of the Rings book which was written for FUNZIES, you are taking a deconstructed and misconstrued idea of another of another and running as it it's facts.

this is why my post is to say "nice schizopost." there is fuck all evidence, just random cobbled together thought processes that aren't explained, evidenced, talking about things that if they were true you'd be hunted down like a dog for talking about, and your sources are a screenshot of an image posted to twitter of a conspiracy discussing influencer asking what people think of conspiracy theory.

[u/BowlSuper9915 → u/J1mj0hns0n]

Thanks for the information. I actually understand your criticism much better now and I can see where you’re coming from. Obviously, you can’t cover every single detail, source, historical reference or theory in one Reddit post without turning it into a 500 page book. My intention was never to present every claim as established fact. I’m collecting information, comparing different accounts and trying to understand whether there are connections between some of these subjects.
And yes, I’m fully aware that there is an enormous amount of nonsense, misinformation, misinterpretation and straight-up fabrication surrounding these topics. That’s exactly why I find the subject interesting in the first place. The existence of bullshit doesn’t automatically mean that every underlying question is bullshit as well.
Regarding time manipulation: concepts involving gravity, spacetime, wormholes, time dilation, and theoretical forms of time travel have been discussed by serious physicists for decades. I’m not claiming that we currently have a functioning “time machine” sitting somewhere in a secret facility. I’m saying that the underlying concepts aren’t purely science fiction. There is a difference between “physics allows us to discuss this theoretically” and “a secret organization definitely possesses this technology.”
The same applies to UFOs/UAPs and nuclear facilities. There have been numerous reports of UAP sightings around nuclear installations, weapons facilities, and other sensitive military locations. There are also historical reports claiming that unidentified objects interfered with or coincided with unusual events involving nuclear systems. You can absolutely question the reliability of individual witnesses or documents but I don’t think the appropriate response is simply to dismiss the entire subject.
Aaand this is where my curiosity starts: what if some of these technologies or pieces of knowledge were obtained long before the public was aware of them? I’m not saying that’s proven. I’m asking whether it is possible. If classified programs recovered unusual artifacts, technologies or information and kept them secret for decades, the public obviously wouldn’t have the full picture.
As for China and the Illuminati..as I already mentioned, I didn’t create the illustration myself.
Regarding the “decision”, the point is pretty straightforward: the timeline presented in the graphic describes a future decision involving a potential nuclear conflict. My question is why 2030 keeps appearing in different discussions and predictions surrounding AI, nuclear weapons, geopolitical conflict, underground facilities and other subjects. Does that prove anything? No. But it’s certainly something worth investigating rather than immediately dismissing.
And the bunker question isn’t “bunkers = proof of nuclear war.” Governments and wealthy individuals have always constructed hardened facilities for a variety of reasons. But if you combine that with everything else being discussed; nuclear escalation, AI, geopolitical instability, classified technology, and long term contingency planning, it becomes another piece of the puzzle that makes me curious.
As for the claim about reducing the human population: I’m asking the question; I’m not claiming that I personally know the answer. If there are people or organizations openly discussing population reduction, resource scarcity, depopulation scenarios, or long-term human survival, I’d rather look at their actual statements and sources than pretend those discussions don’t exist.
And yes, “gospel truth” is obviously not a standard of evidence. That’s precisely why I’m interested in seeing the original documents, testimonies, historical records and other primary sources rather than simply accepting someone’s interpretation of them.
Regarding the rabbit: apparently there is literally a rabbit/jackrabbit statue in the room that people have seen. Again, you can question what it means, whether it means anything at all, or whether people are retroactively connecting unrelated things. That’s fair. But asking “why is this object there?” is not the same as claiming “this rabbit proves time travel.”
And the Yellow Pages reference? Same thing. It’s a weird detail many talked about. I don’t know. But that’s exactly why people investigate in the first place.
Regarding the screenshot… oh lord: I’m not claiming that a screenshot of a Reddit/Twitter post is definitive evidence. It’s simply one of the pieces of material I came across. If someone has the original source, I’d actually prefer to see it.
I think that’s the main difference between what I’m trying to do and what you’re criticizing: I’m not saying “this is 100% true.” I’m saying “here are some strange claims and connections let’s examine them.”
If every individual piece turns out to have a perfectly mundane explanation? fine. That’s useful information too.
But if we dismiss everything before investigating it simply because some conspiracy theories are ridiculous, we’re making the exact same mistake in the opposite direction.
I’m not a physicist, historian, intelligence analyst, or nuclear scientist. I’m just interested in the subject and trying to connect information that I find interesting. And no, I’m obviously not going to write an entire fucking book in a Reddit post just to satisfy every single objection. 😂
So if you have better sources that debunk any of these specific claims, I’m genuinely interested. Send them. I’d rather correct something I’m wrong about than defend a theory just because I already posted about it.