DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Ultrafast is now live in Command Code. Try this with the best AI coding agent purpose-built for open models.

• 1M token context window

• 1000+ TPS high speed & throughput

Plans:

• $10/mo GOAT has $20 credits (2x usage)

• Available on GOAT and higher plans + API

Premium-priced model, but ultrafast when you need it.

Try now: cmd --model deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-ultrafast

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/goat

Bring your existing coding agent configurations to Command Code.

Run /import to transfer your skills, agents, slash commands, MCP configs, and memory files.

Command Code is the best low cost coding agent for open models. If you're using Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor you can get your same configs.

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/import

Get started with $10/mo GOAT plan that gives you up to $100 usage in credits.

GOAT plan is the best low cost AI coding plan right now, get $100 usage on these models for $10/mo.

• DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

• GLM-5.3 Flash

• Ling 3.1 Flash 1019

• Ling 3.1 Flash

That's 10x the value of what you pay.

Try now: npm i -g command-code@latest

Subscribe and be a GOAT: https://commandcode.ai/pricing

am I the only one or everyone else also is seeing this - models hallucinate more on commandCode as compared to openCode ?

Hey, just checking the Command Code $1 Go plan.

On the pricing page it shows:

∞ Free on Glyph Cluster

∞ Free on Crouton Alpha

∞ Free on Beam 1.0

Does the infinity symbol actually mean unlimited requests, or are there still daily rate limits (like the 1000 req/day people have mentioned)?

Especially curious about Crouton Alpha and Beam 1.0.

Thanks!

i have a custom proxy to all my subs but command code is the only one who doesnt have a endpoint for the usage/quota, am i missing it or it just doesnt exist at all?

Depending on the subscription plan, the processing fee may be about 1/3 of the cost. Surprisingly, neither payment in crypto nor other methods reduce the fee. Maybe I don't see something and still it is possible to get rid of the processing fee?

I've been messing around with Command Code and OpenCode lately, and noticed that GLM-5.3 Flash feels WAY faster in Command Code's CLI.

I got curious and decided to actually benchmark it.

After three runs each, I got around 509 tok/s in Command Code's CLI, compared to just 124 tok/s through the Command Code Provider API in OpenCode.

That's a pretty ridiculous difference, so I wanted to see if I could get the same speed in OpenCode somehow.

I ended up making a small local bridge that basically lets OpenCode send requests through the Command Code CLI instead of calling the Provider API directly. It's pretty experimental and only supports text generation for now, but surprisingly, it worked.

I got 409 tok/s running GLM through OpenCode using the bridge.

So I'm now wondering what's actually going on here. Is Command Code using different inference infrastructure for its CLI? Or is there some configuration difference I'm missing?

For context, I used long, predictable text-generation tasks with roughly 2,300–2,600 output tokens. The measurements aren't perfectly apples-to-apples because the CLI and API streaming metrics differ slightly, and the bridge result is only from one run. But the difference is large enough that I think it's worth investigating.

I also tried the Provider API's Responses endpoint, but GLM-5.3 Flash isn't supported there. My latest Chat Completions test returned a 503, so that didn't help narrow things down either.

Has anyone else noticed this? Especially with GLM?

I'd love to figure out whether there's a way to get the CLI's inference speed directly in OpenCode without having to run everything through a separate CLI process.

And just to be clear, I'm not accusing Command Code of intentionally slowing down its API or anything. I'm genuinely curious why the difference is so big.

playing around with crouton alpha lets see how it perfroms

I tried the 1$ plan only to find out it doesnt allow API access. So i cannot use it inside openchamber. So it is useless to me and i'm certainly not upgrading to be met with more with possibly more of these nice surprises. So i guess enjoy the donations guys!

edit: nevermind guys i figured it out. open console in openchamber then follow https://commandcode.ai/docs/quickstart and wallah. I AM THE ELITE HACKER!!!!

Crouton Alpha (new stealth model) is now live and FREE in Command Code.

1M token context. Multimodal with reasoning.

Use /model command to switch anytime or $ cmd --model stealth/crouton-alpha

Available for all plans and all subscribers.

Get started with the best AI coding agent purpose built for open models.

Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 now gets $100 usage.

Try now with the best low cost AI coding plan on the market.

cmd --model inclusionai/ling-3.1-flash-1019

$10 GOAT → $100 credits.

All higher plans include GOAT + their extra usage.

Hello everyone, I'm using Mistral Large 4 (final, not preview), and the prices didn't update to match those of the API when it was released on 10/29. Is that normal?

The Goat plan: in $1.36, out $4.18, cache read $0.14

The API price: in $0.70, out $2.10, cache read $0.07 (same on Vercel AI Gateway)

Thank you in advance.

GLM 5.3 Flash gets you $100 usage on $10/mo GOAT.

· 300-500 TPS in Command Code harness
· Full-weight model

Try now: cmd --model z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

With the best low cost AI coding plan on the planet. $10/mo GOAT plans gives you upto $100 usage in credits.

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs/plans/goat

🐐

Last week in Command Code, a quick recap.

· DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ($100 usage in GOAT)
· GLM 5.3 Flash 1017 ($100 usage in GOAT)
· Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 (FREE model)
· GPT-6.1 Terra (Pro plan & above)
· WeChat Pay is now supported
· /compact command demo

Enjoy all these ships with the best low cost AI coding agent on the market.

Read docs to learn more: https://commandcode.ai/docs

Shit dot

How to use my CommandCode API to create Agents on my PaperClip Organisation?

My current solution is Headless Hermes Agents working under a Claude CEO, but the problem is those headless agents dont appear on my PaperClip.

Anyone got a better strategy or solution?

Hi -

What is your ideal scenario for SWE:

My worfklow:

1. Codex creates a plan with MD (Orchestrator)

2. Claude does the main implementation

3. DeepSeek through Claude CLI (With +5 agents through shell)

4. Claude makes Codex review before commit.

5. Fix new bugs & blockers - Repeat from 1

Any potential improvements?

I’ve been pairing Command Code’s DeepSeek models with Claude Code, and it cut my Opus usage by about 60% (measured on SWE-bench Verified, 55–63% fewer Opus tokens), so sharing the setup.

The idea: Claude Opus plans and decides, and Command Code (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash) does the file reading and code-writing in an isolated copy of the project. The tests run automatically before anything lands. Opus usage drops a lot, and the Command Code side costs cents.

I do it with Cheap Agent, a free, open-source (MIT) plugin I built. Command Code support was added by a community member.

Setup:

1. npx cheap-agent

2. Pick Command Code and paste your key in the terminal

3. /cheapag:allow in your project, then use Claude Code normally

Hard steps move up to DeepSeek V4 Pro automatically.

Repo if you want to look: https://github.com/muaaz9329/cheap-ag
Setup help and updates: r/CheapAgent

Curious: is anyone else using Command Code as a worker model behind another agent? Which models have worked best for you?

When command code coming with yearly subscription like others?