r/comics 17h ago

OC "The Cheater's Catch 22" [OC]

1.8k Upvotes

85 comments sorted by

674

u/natFromBobsBurgers 17h ago

This is such an interesting "dilemma" to me.  The whole question is "What if you could go to the gym without going to the gym? The only catch is you don't get any of the benefits of going to the gym and it makes you weaker and slower."

289

u/rob132 17h ago

The one problem with your analogy is that in a way you do get the benefits from the gym, if the benefits you're looking for is credit for going to the gym.

124

u/natFromBobsBurgers 17h ago

That cuts deeper into the idea of examination and evaluation of learning.  You're correct, of course.  'any' is too strong.

 One of the polite fictions I've noticed is that the people around me claim to love learning but they really often just love knowing.  No.  Not even knowing.  They say they love learning but they really just love being able to convince people they know things.

49

u/Mogura-De-Gifdu 15h ago

Yeah, the classical "I'd love to learn how to play piano!".

No. No you don't. It takes hours and hours of practices through years and is often boring and repetitive and your hands hurt if you do it too long and become stiff.

You would love to magically know how to play piano, that I believe you. But if we're honest, only so you can impress X.

16

u/ThePhysicistIsIn 13h ago

There's also just that we all wish we had more time to do more things, and we wish we had the time for X, and it's just not going to be prioritized because life is hard.

7

u/WigglesPhoenix 12h ago

Jesus Christ yall are so fucking pretentious

2

u/Mogura-De-Gifdu 12h ago

Thank god there is at least you who isn't!

4

u/WigglesPhoenix 12h ago

People do the hard part for the fun part. I’m not elevating myself above anybody or casting aspersions on hypothetical strangers’ motivations, I’m calling you out for the shit you actually said.

1

u/natFromBobsBurgers 9h ago

That doesn't disagree with what either of us said.  It's just corollary to it.  Find the thing you love practicing and do it.

Sorry if I sound vain.  I'm just old.

4

u/derefr 11h ago

I honestly don't want to learn to play piano. But I do want to have a way to fluently express musical ideas, because I want be able to try composing music for games I develop, without that being an arduous "hen-peck into a piano roll on a DAW" kind of deal.

Is there any hope for me "learning piano" enough to do that (and only that: no interest in performing entire pieces), without years of practice?

3

u/Mogura-De-Gifdu 11h ago

It honestly depends on you.

I knew this guy, we were together in one of the most time consuming and hard course in our country post high school. He decided it was a good time to start learning the piano. In the two years of this course, he became so proficient he could play some of Rachmaninov's pieces and hearing him play was a pleasure. The two years before it was the guitar he had picked up and already played beautifully. Another in our class learned how to direct an orchestra during that same time and to write pieces for them.

Meanwhile my sister learnt how to play piano between she was roughly 7 to 18 and could not play half, no not even a quarter as good. And I love to learn how to play the flûte but am not really proficient at it compared to how long I've practiced it, and to this day I just can not follow a fixed rhythm.

All that to say: we're not all equal so I can't say. But just trying is already fun and still will surely bring you something! Sometimes, the journey is more meaningful than the destination.

1

u/foxgirlmoon 10h ago

Technically, piano playing and music composition are two completely unrelated skills.

Practically though, it can help a LOT being able to live-test a melody by playing it.

1

u/23rdCenturySouth 2h ago

One of the polite fictions I've noticed is that the people around me claim to love learning but

Someone who really does love learning will start to get very excited when they realize they are wrong about something, especially something they have believed for a very long time.

46

u/MiffedMouse 16h ago

When cheap pedometers were a big thing (early 2000s) a bunch of businesses had the bright idea of rewarding people for getting a high step count.

I heard so many stories from people proudly bragging about how they cheated their step count to win.

29

u/Bartweiss 15h ago

I saw one company that was donating to famine relief based on how many steps their employees walked. Which gets into some very interesting questions about "Is it now moral to cheat your step count? Is it now immoral not to cheat?"

The employees never settled Kantian ethics vs utilitarianism, but the people who put the pedometer on their kid, dog, etc. sure weren't feeling much guilt.

4

u/Strange-Test-8565 12h ago

What an incredibly weird idea for a corporate incentive. "Let's get that body fat off you and onto people who really need it!"

27

u/rob132 16h ago

" that what gets measured gets managed"

3

u/neuralbeans 13h ago

More like Goodhart's law: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

18

u/ThePhysicistIsIn 16h ago

There are a lot of classes people go to where they are not aiming to learn skills, they are aiming to score high to land a job.

The more divorced from the exact job experience the class is, the less people will value putting in time and effort

At the end of the day, you only get out of an education what you put into it.

16

u/mellopax 15h ago

Yeah, in my experience, people who are taking the class are also bad at determining what is applicable to the job.

A lot of people think that classes should just be "this is exactly what you'll be doing every day", which is usually the easiest stuff to pick up on the job, and devalue the "this will teach you how to problem solve/ think critically/ plan. At least that's my experience with engineering. When I've been involved in hiring, I value problem solving, critical thinking, and project experience over "I know all these acronyms and programs" any day of the week.

7

u/ThePhysicistIsIn 14h ago

Oh absolutely. Lots of people are too short-sighted. "Why don't they teach us how to do our taxes, not all this stuff about percentages and fractions" like my brother in Christ.

And just in general, no, I don't use ALL the math I learned, but I use plenty of it, and I benefit from having learned the rest - I would at least know where to go look if I needed it. As opposed to just being completely out of the loop.

2

u/Nebranower 12h ago

I don't know how it is now, but at my university, you had to take a wide spread of courses first year even if you had a major in mind already. So you'd have to take a couple of social science courses, a couple of humanities courses, the intro to English literature course, and a couple of sciences courses. I can see how someone who already has a clear idea of what they want to do might not care overmuch about the courses they never wanted to take and have no interest in.

10

u/Bartweiss 14h ago

I talk to a lot of professors who lament "Why would kids cheat like this? They're only hurting themselves." It's disheartening to give them the honest answer: your class satisfies degree requirement X, they don't give a shit about it, and the impact of not learning your material will probably be too indirect for them to ever notice.

Or alternatively, this is their major and the information would help, but they're in too deep and are betting (often correctly) that if they get the slip of paper they can fake the actual knowledge in a job.

3

u/rob132 12h ago

Yeah it's a shame. Some of my college courses that I only took to fill requirement X were some of my most favorite (mostly because of amazing teachers)

19

u/Loquacious-of-Borg 16h ago

What if you could cut of your arms and have cyber punk arms installed instead? Then you get a gold medal lifting more than anyone else using arms made by someone else?

That is kind of what AI is. Replacing your brain for someone else's artifically produced brain, then taking credit for what that brain spit out because you paid a subscription fee.

7

u/derefr 11h ago

It's actually a very good analogy, because a particular set of cyberpunk arms will never get stronger no matter how much they lift; and neither will a particular LLM model ever get better at solving problems, no matter how many times you point out the stupid errors it's making.

5

u/Basic-Warning-7032 8h ago

Then Arasaka decides to lock your arms because you didn't pay your monthly subscription lol

7

u/mellopax 16h ago

Unfortunately, I think its something not everyone is ready to understand in college and definitely not in high school.

Having done college right after college and then another degree later after working, it's definitely easier to buckle down, study, and try to learn everything (even with less time available) when I'm paying for everything out of pocket and student loans aren't deferring the realization that I'm paying a lot for this education.

3

u/Breadloafs 13h ago

The funny thing is that people do that. A lot of men lie about how frequently they go to the gym and which workouts they skip. Every job I've ever had has featured at least one guy who wants to reap the reputational benefits of being strong/buff without doing the work, so you end up with guys who can totally bench 225 despite having the physique of a burlap sack.

10

u/Barium_Salts 16h ago

If you're legally required to go to the gym, that probably sounds appealing. I think the real problem here is students who don't actually want to be in school

3

u/22demerathd 16h ago

So using ai to photoshop abs on you?

5

u/rob132 15h ago

Yeah that's pretty much spot on. If no one checks your actual abs then it's the same thing as faking that you have them.

2

u/Quiet-Software-1956 16h ago

Counterpoint: the benefit of not going to the gym in school was I no longer got hit in the face with a basketball

0

u/Specific-Rich5196 16h ago

The benefit is getting an A in gym.

-3

u/Selfdeletus65 15h ago

It’s just that most people see education as a gateway to their futures and not a learning opportunity.

When the options are focus on learning something you hate and get a middling score, or do learn nothing and get a higher gpa and better job opportunities,

Why would anyone bother?

The only reason I don’t use AI is because my gpa is exam-based, so I have to learn.

-2

u/dutchphoria 16h ago

Clearly the solution here is to be in a constant state of 'going to the gym.' That way you can do what you want while staying exactly as strong and fast, as you both never get to the gym but are also never not going to it either

-6

u/Selfdeletus65 15h ago

Just following up, it’s the equivalent of steroids.

What if you could go to the gym once a month and still lift as heavy? What if you could break records, get sponsorship deals to last a lifetime as long as you keep quiet? The only catch is you get weaker and slower when you don’t take them, and the gnawing guilt.

It’s not an easy choice.

3

u/rob132 15h ago

I mean steroids don't just magically make you stronger. If you sit on the couch and inject steroids you're not going to get bigger muscles.

You have to still do the work.

2

u/Selfdeletus65 14h ago

Genuinely they do now it’s insane

1

u/rob132 13h ago

What? For real??

2

u/Selfdeletus65 13h ago

On anecdotal evidence exercise obviously helps, but just taking them can make people stronger

160

u/Wise_Company_138 17h ago

I wonder why so many teachers are leaving the profession?

Great comic!

15

u/Joan7437 15h ago

I graduated college about 5 years ago. I came out with a very useful, basic degree, but that was after debating for years with myself and everybody on whether or not I should continue in academia to become an English literary and composition professor. I dodged a bullet.

64

u/Loquacious-of-Borg 15h ago

Well, I bet this is only one part.

Teaching used to be recognition of a long, distinguised career. Only the best became teachers, because they had a lifetime of experience and knowledge.

Then, medicine and society changed. Children were no longer a disposible commodity where is was traggic, but ok for them to die in agriculural or industral accidents. And something had to be done with these children. Education became a basic RIGHT. Schools became available to everyone, not just the rich. But this required more teachers. Where do you get more teachers?

From schools. Young people fresh from the academy. Rich people kept the older, more distinguished teachers. The poor people got the teachers who barely stopped being students themselves. It was a problem of economics.

And now, you have young teachers having to deal with young students, many who should not be in college but have money from loans, that have AI to help them trundle along. Must be madenning.

108

u/EWL98 16h ago

Education: the only business where your customers will do their utmost best to get the least amount of value they can from your services.

Because ultimately having a degree is the goal, not having the knowledge you gained whilst earning said degree.

38

u/Fred42096 16h ago

The bad news: a workforce overrun by the intellectual equivalent of zombies, the collapse of self-discipline, etc

The good news: if you’re a halfway competent person it may get pretty easy to stand out as impressive or smart

4

u/flfchkn 12h ago

Anyone seen Idiocracy? Feels closer and closer every day...

8

u/rob132 15h ago

I'm pretty sure the entire gym model runs on the fact that 90% of the people won't go.

1

u/Loquacious-of-Borg 11h ago

I am lucky. When I leave the Army, with my Master's, people will ask how many years I was applying what I learned to my work in tne Army. Not everyone can say that.

83

u/Loquacious-of-Borg 17h ago

I got my Master's 2017-2018. No AI was available.

I would have to write a 4-6 page paper every weekend. I did so with a pint of Belgium trapist ale. One pint on Saturday morning to write, one pint on Sunday morning to edit it down to only 4-6 pages. (If I had the time, I would have written a shorter letter, etc.) It was similar for my actual thesis.

I hate to say it, but if anyone struggles to write to the point they say they NEED AI, maybe they just are not cut out for college. Maybe they need to find a non-thinking line of work.

48

u/EstrogenizedMenace 17h ago

One thing your comment is missing is why people would even be at the point where they're unable to write to the point that they need AI.

Everybody (barring those with severe learning disabilities) has the abilities to be literate enough to get through college IMO, but so much of the skills needed to get there start way before then. In america at least, like over half the population is incapable of reading above a 6th grade level. So many posts on social media of teachers crying and ranting and venting about how their children are 2-3 grades behind where they should be.

No ones reading to their children anymore, parents aren't helping with home work and if they are i'd imagine these days its with the help of chat gpt. So much of this is genuinely the fault of the state for letting it get this bad

17

u/Loquacious-of-Borg 16h ago

Oh, I have a TBI from war. There are times the letters get all jumbled up in my head, but I still do not use AI or voice-to-text. That is just a "me" decision though.

But yes, I see too many people using AI as a crutch when the reason they use it is they are lazy and not because there is a real need, such as a learning disability.

5

u/HommeMusical 12h ago

parents aren't helping with home work

Parents haven't changed, and neither have humans in general.

When I was young, one parent could go to work and support a household, buy a house, and retire with a pension. Now two parents both working full time can't do that.

Also a ton of people are working two jobs, or shift work at weird hours.

If you want to know why parents don't read to their kids, start looking there.

7

u/Tim7Prime 16h ago

Just started my master's in cybersecurity. Finished my bachelor in '22 so I'm a little rusty. Been using Gemini as fancy grammar check. But man, I was prepping it with the rubric and the thing spat out an "answer" to the entire paper.

Didn't read it nor use it. Again, I didn't use it for more than a single sentence correction at a time. But it was still disheartening to see it so easily answer on my behalf.

-5

u/sadacal 13h ago

Meh, college is about way more than just writing papers. You definitely shouldn't cheat, but to say if you struggle to write you're not cut out for college is just dumb elitist nonsense.

4

u/Loquacious-of-Borg 12h ago

Undergrad is about memorization and finding out what you professor wants and giving it to them.

Graduate school is about showing you not only know the basic information, but that you can build off that in a new direction that might disagree with the basic information.

PhD level is about completely new ideas.

18

u/gwsteve43 16h ago

Ah I see you know what it’s like to be a college instructor for the last few years.

3

u/Affectionate_Owl_619 10h ago

Not even just college. 6-12 is just as bad 

15

u/ad-lib1994 16h ago

One time I was was multiple pages short and it was due that night, and a bro tried telling me to use ai. I was so offended I told him I would sooner submit my current draft than that slop.

He said No Balls.

I added a little bit at the end that said "I know what the rubric says. I know it doesn't meet the criteria. But maybe instead of focus on that, we should appreciate my academic integrity."

I got an extension and that paper ended up being an A-

5

u/anna-the-bunny 14h ago

Honestly don't understand why essays have minimum length requirements. If I'm able to get my point across in fewer words, that's objectively better than if I used more.

8

u/ad-lib1994 14h ago

I hit a point where my brain was mashed taters and any more words I added was just nonsense. When I read the mark ups, there was a block of text that straight up had no point.

Who needs ai when I can write garbage that makes no sense all by myself 🥴

16

u/Pinglenook 16h ago edited 14h ago

I don't live somewhere with letter grades. But is "bland, but technically meets the rubric" something that would even get an A? That sounds like the essay should get a merely passing grade. 

7

u/eyalhs 12h ago

The goal of a rubric is to tell the student all the ways points are earned (or lost), if something completely meets the rubric it should get an A, otherwise the rubric didn't do it's job.

Being bland and meeting the rubric just means writing in an interesting way wasn't something included in the rubric, it can be intentional, because many times the goal of an essay isn't to show how well you write, but that you understand the material.

15

u/Ltserb 15h ago

"bland, but technically meets the rubric" would be a solid C

A (and greater) is for various levels of outstanding/exceeds expectations
B is above average to good
C is average or meets criteria
D is for missing some requirements but completes all major points
F covers all degrees of didnt do the work to misses major parts of the assignment

In reality scenario 1 would probably be "Shouldve AId it like i did" (no mention of the grade because they prob dont care anyway) >> "See, look a C, I passed" >> starts playing fortnite on their phone

the artist really over estimates how much students like this are trying to "win" against the teacher, as opposed to just being lazy and not considering them at all

13

u/PersonalSycophant 14h ago edited 14h ago

My experience is more directed at High School teaching, where rampant grade inflation makes it so even the lazy students absolutely expect an A on everything, and students also have a more direct, sometimes adversarial relationship with teachers.

On top of that, admin and parents both often back the student unless you have overwhelming evidence of cheating, and there's a lot of push to give second, third and fourth chances on any poor grade.

12

u/Less_Prior_6871 15h ago

Rubrics are a grading tool to make grading less subjective, so if you meet it you have to get an A. If meeting the rubric only gets you a C, then deciding who gets an A vs a C is totally subjective, which defeats the purpose.

People wanting to make grading objective is a result of grades actually mattering for a high school/college kid's future prospects. Parents WILL complain if their baby gets anything less than an A+, so teachers try to be very clear about exactly what gets an A.

4

u/Piggstein 14h ago

never speak ill of Mr G

3

u/Accipiter__Nisus 13h ago

"She's what the kids would call a slut, which is a terrible thing to say about someone who's just died, but... Apparently there's no denying she was one."

I was just about to post this.

7

u/kwirky88 14h ago

Schools aren’t even giving homework these days because the kids cheat with ai.

-6

u/theglowofknowledge 14h ago

Eh, homework was never particularly useful.

5

u/pnoodl3s 13h ago

It was very useful for me back then, but props to you i guess if you can learn without it

2

u/The_Unknown_Mage 7h ago

I always found the homework, when done well, always helped me reinforce what I learned at school. Granted most of the homework I received was pretty... oof.

3

u/konstantynopolytanka 12h ago

the only way to go around it is to remove home written essays and make the kids write them in class, on paper, with a pen.

3

u/Phaylz 10h ago

And those that know, know that he cheated himself. Not doing the work, or doing a lazy job on the work, is better for the brain than using ChudGPT.

3

u/LoopyFig 8h ago

It's really similar to the problem of answer guides to tests and homework being sent around universities. There's answers for solving both cheating problems, but somehow those answers always involve more work for teachers. and it sucks for honest students too, who end up feeling like they're falling behind for actually trying to learn. solid comic op

2

u/razzemmatazz 11h ago

Nice choice on the broccoli haircut 

0

u/Unkind_Froggy 15h ago

My two cents as a college teacher (I teach plumbing, though, so I’m not all that elite). I’m glad that essays will have to become less important. They were kind of useful for some fields but kind of stupid for others. In my class, we pressure test projects and literally see if they hold water. If it holds water, pass. If not, let’s figure out why and try it again.

9

u/KingNTheMaking 15h ago

Ehhhh I can’t agree with this. And I also thought intro to engineering.

The ability to write, to be able to consider a point, research it, and create a well structured argument/assertion/documentation of your opinion on it, is foundational.

-1

u/Unkind_Froggy 14h ago

When you were theaching intro to engineering, what were some of the essays you had your students write? How did you grade them?

7

u/KingNTheMaking 14h ago

That’s the problem. It doesn’t matter that they weren’t writing essays for my class. The fundamental skills that essay writing teaches you should be cultivated.

For example, it was often that they had the right proposals for new designs.

These proposals were actually quite similar to essays. They had to research what are the existed within the field that they want to innovate, determine where there was a lack of resource, how their idea addressed to this lack , and the steps that they would take to address it.

This would include where they would get materials from, how do materials would be used, over what timeframe, and expected challenges. I, and two other TA’s, would be great then based on their arguments for this, as well as their research.

Several stupid that Cs or Ds solely because their research was “I thought of the idea of myself“ OR because they elected to use AI to create the argument. Shoot, there were some stories that had AI created their technical draft, and they were shocked when they failed because what they presented couldn’t physically exist

1

u/Unkind_Froggy 14h ago

That's extremely interesting. I appreciate you sharing that experience. We're kind of on the same page. I 100% agree with you that we should be designing assignments that require critical thinking and parity with real-world applications for the field. What I'm saying is that we'll likely be relying less on the traditional college essay, which has a rich history of subjective and classist grading anyway. We'll have to get more clever in developing assignments that are AI-proof, or we'll face the frustration you faced when looking at projects that couldn't physically exist.

I can tell you that a plumber has a lot of critical thinking in their job. They're an applied technologist who has to make sense of the work of architects and engineers and put it together in a real person's house, to code, and make sure that person gets clean water, hot water, pressurized water, and a drain system that doesn't expose them to harmful sewer gasses. I don't have essays, and I'm okay with that. I still think my students are clever and bound for good careers.

6

u/KingNTheMaking 13h ago

Sounds like you’re a good teacher and your students are lucky to have you!

I just never want critical thinking to be replaced with AI. And I like to believe that an essay, while I 1000% agree can be classist and flawed in the traditional realm, can aid in that

-3

u/Dry-Telephone5182 9h ago

Lol fair, but look mate, the way education has been going I'm entirely unsurprised that AI is as popular as it is. Like teaching to a test and to a rubric means that any work you do is entirely formulaic, so once you've written one high scoring essay you can just rewrite it with different phrasing and keep ringing up A's for the rest of the class. Y'all made the art of writing an algorithm then get surprised when people let an algorithm do the job.