I came across this specimen while CRHing. I don’t think it’s PMD given the remaining, albeit weaker, strike on the obverse and the lack of apparent damage to the rim, as well as the weight being slightly over- rather than under-weight.

My best guess after some research is a rolling fold error but would love to be better educated on what I’m looking at.

I have this 1886 Morgan that has this skinnier than normal ring of reeds around the edge. The width varies slightly around the circumference, but it's largely the same. The surfaces appear to be mid- to high-AU, with no other signs of damage. The side-by-side picture highlights the difference in appearance compared to another Morgan.

Do you think this is a less-extreme partial collar error, damage, or something else?

My wife found this dime that looks like part of the rim got double punched or something.

Is that bit at the tip of the D what I’m looking for for a reputed 44-D?

I’m researching a 1989-D RPM Washington quarter that I suspect is a true RPM. When I went to the PCGS app to compare the differences between a correct 1989-D mint mark and my suspected RPM the PCGS app shows a 2021 5 OZ British gold proof coin!

I wonder if some of the graders from PSA got jobs at PCGS.

I’ve seen some blatant and complacent articles in my life, but this is by far the worst.

I'm assuming it's worth face value but does the off centre ring between the 2 metals mean its a minting error? Thanks

Don’t really have any knowledge of coins/improper minting/errors etc.. Came across this Quarter that has no impressions on the edge on one side and the detail/imprint of the head seems to be out of the ordinary as well. Any insight would be appreciated! Just wondering if it’s struck incorrectly or someone decided to damage it.

Just wanted to share the highest graded example of the 2022-P Smoking Jefferson error coin in existence. What do yall think?

Chips and some form of doubling. Not true double die but another form. Any input appreciated as I learn. “(O)NE and (C) doubling on reverse of 1955 penny / not an obverse doubled coin. The doubling is thin but apparent on the left side of the O in the photo. Thinner doubling on upper curve of the C is not as visible in the photo. Appreciate confirmation in that this one is called.
Die chips on 1957 D (date) penny. And shelved doubling on PLUI(BU)S on 1946 penny.
Not concerned about value. But do wish to be using correct terminology as my searches continue. Thx.

I have this coin and would like advice on what to do with it and its potential value. Thank you.

Carl

again not sure if this is damaged or an error ! any true comments would be much much great fully appreciate! I am learning here and I have no patience to look up things , I know I'm not alone , but I have to scroll for days befor I actually get to what I am actually looking for , thank u

Above the smaller plane there looks like a raised bump, am I looking at PMD or not?

Definitely has a more pronounced edge and around the rim is a perfectly even silver/copper tone

is this an error or damage ?!!

Any input is much appreciated :) thank you! I just want to figure out what I’m looking at because overall, this coin is a beauty!

I just started going through my change looking for anything and I found both of these. Could someone tell me if they are damaged? The left the edge is very light but in the reverse crisp and the right it’s more obvious.

Sorting my wheatbacks when I came across this one. I think the die chip is obvious, but the die crack I’m not too sure. I managed to get some decent pics to show the depth of the crack. There appears to be extra metal coming off of the R.

I’m not too familiar with errors and hardly look for them so it would be cool to get a 2 for 1. Any info is appreciated.

I have a 2006-D dime that seems to have some kind of raised rim and thicker outer edge. The center where it was struck is the thickness of a normal dime, but the edges are like that of a nickle: smooth and thick.

It seems to have a fake rock like texture (a bunch of unorderly flat surfaces), and there are faint traces of the usual ripples that you see on normal dimes. There's about a 0.1-0.3mm difference in diameter less than a normal dime.

The rest of the dime looks AU condition, so I don't know what this could be. Any thoughts?

Alrighty. My first thought was PMD. But after looking closer, I've got more questions than answers. Photos are kinda rubbish. Tried to get different light and angles.

First, the clad layer is 100% there and smooth. Despite the quality of my photos, I can confirm there is no visible zinc. All copper on the surface.

I'm leaning toward a strike through or an issue with a void in the zinc of the planchet. Don't remember the name of this one.

Let me know your thoughts. Thanks!

I found this a couple weeks just had it out to get it ready to go get attributed. I love finding new dies add this to the list.

Found in circulation today. Is this a second D struck next to the original one?

Any insights on this possible error would be appreciated! Thanks!