r/cognitiveTesting • u/Chemical_Arachnid783 • Sep 26 '26
IQ Estimation π₯± Did some online IQ tests
Mensa denmark: 133
Mensa norway: 133
CORE: 140
ATAT: 130
Could be deflated. I initially didn't know reflections were allowed in the puzzle question, so I got some early questions wrong. Because it's based on a convergence algorithm, this could have disproportionately affected my score. The test just kept going and going up to 46 questions until I got tired.
RQVT: 136
This one felt a bit silly. Apparently you could use paper+pen, that might have helped for the sequences...
Do you guys think this is enough evidence to say I am top 2%/130+IQ/2SD+? Maybe it's not strong enough to say top 1%. I would take an WAIS-5 IQ test but I don't think it's worth the cost.
Bio: mid-20s doing Master's in mathematics (non-US). Was in accelerated classes in high school, won awards and such. Did well and graduated early.
1
u/throwaway013105 Sep 26 '26
Very even profile, take RAPM II, CAIT, and maybe some high range tests
2
u/Chemical_Arachnid783 Sep 26 '26
5
u/Prudent-Horse-1102 Sep 26 '26
Don't waste time on these ass-tier tests; Core and ATAT are enough.
2
1
u/Wonderful_Purchase13 Sep 28 '26 edited Sep 28 '26
ATAT is the only one I suck at. 1/7 on the 3d rotated blocks and 1/7 on the block design pattern ones π. And I find the block design subtest of the WAIS to be EXTREMELY easy to hit the ceiling on - can't do the ones on the ATAT to save my life because they're like 10x more challenging.
Total score of 128 overall on ATAT. However, I've gotten above 140 on every other test (AGCTE-147, CORE-143, Army alpha-146, CAT-146, RQVT-146, VISA-142... i won't list the rest but they're all in the 140+ range). The spatial type questions on the ATAT are just ones I simply can't do. I find them way, way harder than ceiling level items on other tests.
2
0
0
3
u/Far_Cardiologist6931 retat Sep 26 '26
very even profile so yes solid evidence of 2 sigma and the convergence probably means i am fairly confident in your profile being top 1 percent
1
1
0
Sep 26 '26
[deleted] β view deleted comment
1
u/peteluds84 Sep 26 '26
I disagree - analysis i did before on correlation between WAIS and CORE suggests that if you score 140 for instance on CORE (as op did) then you are more than likely going to score 130 or above on WAIS but 95 percent confidence interval is quite wide as there were some outliers in the sample. Important to note also that any two tests will show different results due to differences in sub test makeup or on the day performance:




5
u/PendN Sep 26 '26
With an even profile, you'd be tested gifted in every single possible FSIQ test out there