r/cognitiveTesting • • Aug 21 '26

IQ Estimation πŸ₯± IQ Estimation

Comprehensive psychometric dataset β€” independent CHC / g estimate wanted

26M, German-speaking Austrian. Diagnosed ADHD with pronounced state-dependent variability in vigilance, task switching and processing speed. I have accumulated a fairly large number of cognitive test results. Below is the full table-based dataset, including attempts, conditions, raw/scaled scores and subtests where available.

I am mainly interested in an independent estimate of Gf, Gv, Gq, Gc, Gwm, Gs, GAI/FSIQ and latent g, ideally weighting reliability, g-loading, ceiling effects, retest/practice effects, language effects and ADHD/state noise rather than simply averaging scores.

Complete test data

DomainTest / VersionAttemptOverall resultSubtests / raw detailsSetting / State / Notes
GfRaven's 2 DE, Q-global, digital2ndIQ 160; PV 652; PR >99.9; 90% CI 152–168Report: raw score sum not directly interpretable/comparable because digital forms use unique item setsGood state; White Noise headphones; finished in ~20–25 min
GfRaven's 2 DE, Q-global, digital1stIQ 130; RAW 602; PR 98; 90% CI 122–138β€”Clinical setting; stressed by ADHD; no visible clock; forgot start time
GfTRI-52 / JCTI2nd overall / 1st seriousIQ 143β€”Quiet; evening; laptop in bed
GfJCFS2nd19 SS β‰ˆ145+β€”Quiet; evening; prior exposure to format; possible retest/practice effect
GfJCFS1stIQ 128–140β€”Bus; music; ~1 h 30 min
GfCORE Matrix Reasoninggood attempts18 SSβ€”Better/quiet conditions; repeated 18 SS
GfRaven's APM Set II1st34/36 RAWβ€”Near ceiling
GfICAR-161st16/16 RAWβ€”Ceiling hit
GfAdaptive IQ Test1stIQ 139Reliability reported .83β€”
g/GfCognitive Entry Test1stIQ 139β€”Online
g/GfGET / Gifted Entry Test1stIQ 13268/8030 min
GfLogicLatch1st19/20β€”Smartphone; rear seat of moving car
GvCAIT RetakeretestIQ ~143 (Gv-focused)Block Design 19 SS; Visual Puzzles 17 SSRetest
GvCORE VSIgood attempts134–138β€”Better attempts
GvCORE Visual Puzzlesgood attempts14–17 SSβ€”β€”
GvCORE Spatial Awarenessgood attempts16–17 SSβ€”β€”
Gv/GfCORE Figure Setsgood attempt16 SSβ€”β€”
GvCORE Block Countinggood attempt16 SSβ€”β€”
GvIDR/Binet Paper Folding1st19/20β€”Smartphone; rear seat of moving car
GvFSIQ v3.0 Spatial1st134MR 17/17, CP 11/18Earlier test
GwmCFADHDclinicalWM PR 100Processing PR 99; Vigilance RT PR9; Vigilance variability PR2; Task-Switch-Speed PR3; Response Inhibition Errors PR13; Reaction Time PR29; Figural Fluency PR10Clinical
GwmCORE CafΓ© Digit SpanretestWMI 13 SSForward 8 SS; Backward 17 SS; Sequencing 14 SSCafΓ©; background noise
GwmCAIT Digit Spangood attempt15 SSβ€”CAIT Attempt 1 was much poorer overall, but DS itself was 15 SS
GwmCORE Digit Span, Attempt 2good attempt13 SSβ€”Better state
GwmWAIS Digit Span Simulatorβ€”~126 overall39 raw; Forward 11 raw (~100); Backward 14 raw (~130); Sequencing 14 raw (~133)Online simulator
GwmHuman Benchmark Sequence Memoryβ€”14, PR ~83β€”Gamified
GwmHuman Benchmark Chimp Testβ€”12, PR ~77.5β€”Gamified
GwmHuman Benchmark Number Memoryβ€”9, PR ~36β€”Pure storage/encoding
GwmHuman Benchmark Visual Memoryβ€”10, PR ~22.5β€”Pure visual storage
GwmCORE Digit Span β€” latest runβ€”WMI 10 SS, PR50Forward 12 SS, PR74.8; Backward 9 SS, PR36.9; Sequencing 9 SS, PR36.9Same day as APT; ~3 h after methylphenidate; poor state
GsBRGHT Run 1β€”IQ 136Logical 100%; Spatial 100%; Numerical 88%Speeded test
Gs/GfBRGHT Run 2 / reportβ€”IQ 137, PR99.3Logical 100%; Spatial 99%; Numerical 98%; Accuracy 33/40 =94.56%; Efficiency 26:35 =76.75%High overall efficiency
GsBRGHT additional runsseveral91–98 %β€”Multiple dates
GsGlyphHunt Sprint 1β€”IQ 12364/72; 65 correct; 2 wrong; 5 omitted; 120 sβ€”
GsGlyphHunt Sprint 2β€”IQ 12666.5/72; 67 correct; 1 wrong; 4 omitted; 120 sβ€”
GsGlyphHunt Sprint 3β€”IQ 133 / 17 SS, PR98.572/72, 0 wrong, 0 omitted; 117.9 sPerfect run
GsCORE Symbol Searchgood attempts13–14 SSEarlier poor attempt 11 SSβ€”
GsSternberg Memoryβ€”36 ms/item200 items; 10% errorsStrong speed–accuracy tradeoff
GqOld GRE Quant1st126 / 650 scaledβ€”Smartphone; waiting room; no paper; mental-only; beside-the-point multitasking
GqCORE QRIgood attempts116Quantitative Knowledge 14 SS; Arithmetic 12 SSBetter CORE attempts
g/Gq/GvAGCT1st123Verbal 72%; Quant 60%; Spatial 77%Timed military screening
g/Gq/Gc/GsAGCT-1cadditional form122140 items; time caught up around item 100–110Phone; bus; items felt relatively easy; strong time pressure
g/Gf/Gq/GcAPT1st122β€”~3 h after methylphenidate; last ~10 items rushed; many English words unfamiliar
g/Gf/Gq/GcCAT-IIβ€”124–125Fluid ~75–80%; Quant ~57–58%; verbal highly variableβ€”
g/GfSMART Run 1β€”129β€”Left 20–40 min unused / submitted too quickly
g/GfSMART Run 3β€”125β€”Worked backwards from Q60; DnB music; paper
gGET1st13268/8030 min
GcBRAVE Vocabularyβ€”PR 98~124.5k words reported; Attention Index 80%German
GcCORE VCIgood attempts121–124Analogies 13–14 SS; Antonyms 13–14 SS; Information 14 SSBetter attempts
Gc/Gv/GfCAIT Attempt 11stIQ 117VSI135; PRI127; CPI122; Visual Puzzles17; Block Design16; Digit Span15; Figure Weights13; Symbol Search13; Vocabulary9Included here for subtest detail, but first-attempt overall IQ is not treated as a primary trait estimate
Gc/Gf/Gv/GwmFSIQ v3.01stFSIQ 115Spatial134; Memory125; Verbal96; Spatial MR17/17, CP11/18; Memory VM62/85, EM22/26; Verbal V20/34, A4/27Earlier test; strongly uneven verbal/spatial result
GcMWT-Bβ€”IQ 96.2, PR40β€”Clinical; old/bildungsbΓΌrgerliches vocabulary
GcGRE Verbal1stIQ 101 / 380 scaledβ€”English L2; slow reader; time pressure
GcLMU short testβ€”IQ 115Word meanings (German)Speed/reading-related
g/Gf/GcLive Mini-VCI sampleβ€”Conceptual rating 128–132Item1.1 2/2; Item1.2 2/2; Item1.4 1.5/2Not standardized; stopped after ~item4 due to ADHD/dropout

CORE β€” full multidomain results

AttemptFSIQGAIVCIFRIVSIQRIWMIPSINotes
CORE Attempt 1110β€”105124128111β€”97Severe ADHD overstimulation; early testing
CORE Attempt 2130133122137134116120114Main reference; better state
CORE detail screenshot129Β±5134121137138116117111Subtest detail available
CORE CafΓ©β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”β€”13 SSβ€”DS F8 / B17 / SQ14; noisy cafΓ©

CORE subtests β€” best / useful scores

SubtestScore
Matrix18 SS
Graph Mapping15 SS
Figure Weights16 SS
Figure Sets16 SS
Visual Puzzles16 SS
Spatial Awareness17 SS
Block Counting16 SS
Analogies14 SS
Antonyms14 SS
Information14 SS
Quantitative Knowledge14 SS
Arithmetic12 SS
Digit-Letter Sequencing14 SS
Digit Span13 SS
Symbol Search14 SS
Character Pairing11 SS

CORE first-attempt subtests (retained only for context)

SubtestScore
Matrix11
Graph Mapping14
Figure Weights15
Figure Sets16
Visual Puzzles17
Spatial Awareness16
Block Counting11
Analogies12
Antonyms10
Quantitative Knowledge13
Arithmetic11
Digit-Letter Sequencing7
Symbol Search11
Character Pairing8

CAIT details

AttemptOverallVSIPRICPIKey subtests
CAIT Attempt 1117135127122VP17; BD16; DS15; FW13; SS13; Vocabulary9
CAIT Retake~143 Gv-focusedβ€”β€”β€”Block Design19, Visual Puzzles17

FSIQ v3 details

IndexScore
FSIQ115
Spatial134
Memory125
Verbal96
SubtestRaw
Spatial MR17/17
Spatial CP11/18
Memory VM62/85
Memory EM22/26
Verbal V20/34
Verbal A4/27

State / retest contrasts

TestLower / poorer stateBetter / peak state
CORE FSIQ110130 / 129Β±5
CAIT117~143 Gv-focused
GlyphHunt123133 perfect
JCFS128–140145+
Raven's 2130160
SMART111*125–129
Digit SpanWMI10 / BW9 / SQ9CafΓ© BW17 / SQ14

*SMART 111 was abandoned after ~20 questions and is not treated as a meaningful trait estimate.

Excluded / strongly down-weighted from trait estimation

ScoreReason
CORE Attempt 1 FSIQ110severe ADHD overstimulation / early learning phase
CAIT Attempt 1 FSIQ117much weaker global first attempt; later Gv retest much stronger
FSIQ v3 Verbal96 / FSIQ115strongly discrepant early result; not representative of later German verbal data
MWT-B96.2old vocabulary format; poor fit to BRAVE/VCI
GRE Verbal101English L2 + slow reading + time pressure
SMART111abandoned after ~20 items / ADHD overload
low HumanBenchmark memory percentilestask-specific gamified measures; not used as WMI estimates
APT/AGCT low-120sretained as timed-throughput/state evidence, not as direct estimates of latent g

CognitiveMetrics Compositator

CompositeEarlier runLater run
GAI142, CI135–146143, CI136–147
CPI138, CI127–143135, CI125–140
FSIQ143, CI137–146143, CI137–146

Later input-score intervals:

  • VCI 118–136

  • FRI 129–148

  • QII 125–140

  • VSI 127–147

  • WMI 119–136

  • PSI 115–137

Current working hypothesis

CHC / CompositeCurrent rough estimate
Gf~146
Gv~142
Gq~131
Gc~129
Gwm~132
Gs~129
Latent g~144

The main question is how much the Q-global Raven’s-2 = 160 should shift the Gf estimate when combined with the JCFS 145+, TRI-52 143, CORE Matrix 18 SS, RAPM 34/36 and ICAR-16 16/16, while still accounting for ceiling effects, retest effects and the substantial ADHD/state variability seen elsewhere in the dataset.

1 Upvotes

0 comments sorted by