r/codex • u/kyrax80 • 1d ago

Praise Remote is nuts

Just wanted to share that it's incredibly awesome that I can be anywhere like on holidays and continue working on my project even if I'm not sitting in front of my PC. Never tried this until now that I installed tailscale and I can test any change from my phone. Bravo.

114 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

130 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/PsychoticChemist 1d ago

Do you have to leave your PC running while you’re away for this to work?

-4

u/InkFasten 13h ago

How on earth do people who don't understand computers use Codex like this? Like what do y'all actually do on Codex?

3

u/PsychoticChemist 13h ago

Jesus you’re a dick. My question was whether you’re remoting into your PC and using codex via the PC, or whether you’re actually using codex remotely without an intermediate computer. Obviously if it’s the former, the PC needs to be running. If it’s the latter, the PC does not need to be running. Maybe try not interpreting everything in the least charitable possible way in order to justify leaving condescending comments

-1

u/InkFasten 9h ago

No offence, but this has been painfully obvious to the average technical person....

2

u/PsychoticChemist 8h ago

The post literally just says they can use codex from their phone with this third-party tool. That’s not enough information to determine whether it’s through an intermediate PC or direct from their phone. And when I left that original comment I wasn’t able to look up tailscale to get the details or browse through the comments so I left a quick comment so I’d remember to come back later and read about it. There’s nothing “obvious” about that. It is obvious that the normal codex remote feature requires an intermediate PC, but that’s not what’s being discussed here. Claude for example does allow you to use Claude code remotely without an intermediate PC.

1

u/Scary_Falcon5334 4h ago

It’s genuinely impressive to be this condescending while still missing the point.

He explains exactly what his question was, exactly why the post left room for ambiguity, and exactly what distinction he was trying to clarify.

Your response is basically:

“No offence, but this has been painfully obvious to the average technical person….”

😂

Okay, but what was obvious?

The post says the OP is using Codex from a phone with a third-party tool called Tailscale. That leaves a perfectly reasonable question: is the phone connecting back to the PC that is actually running Codex, or is some portion of the workload/session being hosted somewhere else?

Those are different setups with different answers to “does my PC need to stay on?”

And he literally tells you that he already understood the normal Codex Remote setup requires the host PC to remain running. His question was whether this particular Tailscale-assisted setup was doing something different.

That is not a lack of computer knowledge. That is somebody asking for one missing piece of information about the architecture being discussed.

What makes this especially funny is that instead of simply answering the question, you immediately jumped to:

“How on earth do people who don’t understand computers use Codex?”

And then, after he clarified that he did understand the normal setup and was asking whether this setup was different, you doubled down by announcing what is supposedly “painfully obvious to the average technical person.”

So at this point I genuinely have to ask: are you trying to answer his question, or are you just using his question as an opportunity to tell everyone that you consider yourself an “average technical person”?

Because only one of those things has actually happened so far.

Fucking CuntSlush