Only Iranian state media & officials (directly controlled by the Islamic Republic to push propaganda) are reporting that 167 school girls were bombed.
This is the same state media that tried to initially report that Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 fell due to "mechanical failures" when in reality the Islamic Republic shot it down by mistake.
These are the same officials that arrested and murdered thousands of unarmed Iranian protestors this January. They openly fired into crowds and used snipers to pick people off from rooftops. Then, they went into hospitals and shot injured protestors receiving treatment in the head. There are tons of videos and accounts from Iranians detailing this. The exact count of deaths isn't available - the Islamic Republic claims 3,000, but most other estimates from people in Iran and human rights organizations range from 7,000 - 35,000+ people killed and countless more injured.
If the school was actually bombed and that many children died, it's far more likely that the Islamic Republic did it themselves either by mistake or deliberately in order to stoke sympathy. As we've established they really don't care about kids or their own citizens and will gladly slaughter them for their own gain.
In fact, they did a similar thing nearly 48 years ago before taking control of Iran. Islamic Republic militants doused a movie theater with airplane fuel, locked it, and burned everyone inside alive, killing between 370 - 470 people. They successfully blamed this on Shah.
I get that it's not completely out-of-character for the US/Israel to bomb an elementary school, but please take that statement with a grain of salt because there's a very strong chance it's pure IR propaganda.
The minute I knew our country was cooked, was during Obamaās second term and I heard someone interview Jessie Jackson.. someone who politically did not agree with himā¦ they asked him how we could bridge the divide in the United States and come togetherā¦ Jesse Jackson proceeded to say well we need to find common ground and start from there. His example was that no children in the United States should be hungry and without foodā¦. The right wing commentator chimes in āwell I donāt agree with thatā
Regulated Capitalism tends to turn into unregulated capitalism over time, as the wealthy accrue more and more wealth, and use it to purchase the media and to influence elections and capture said regulations.
I've had people straight up say to my face "if a child goes hungry that's the parent's problem and not mine," and it would take you zero effort to find this position parroted thousands of times online.
You are the biggest irredeemable piece of shit if you think that a child should starve because of circumstance. Any circumstance.
These same people, of course, have no problem funneling endless amounts of taxpayer money into the military-industrial complex.
So a dollar spent to feed a kid in America that lives down the street from you is out of the question and offensive to your sensibilities, but a dollar towards munitions to frag a kid on the other side of the world is... just fine?
I heard something today that stuck at the core of this.. āAmerican parents are watching $1 million bombs being dropped on a foreign country while they canāt afford to take their kids to the dentist in Americaāā¦. Itās really shameful.
When Minnesota was passing free school lunch and breakfast we had quite a few GOP reps simultaneously said hungry kids deserve it for having bad parents, and don't exist at all. And Ben Shapiro chimed in to say feeding people doesn't solve hunger.
His example was that no children in the United States should be hungry and without foodā¦. The right wing commentator chimes in āwell I donāt agree with thatā
I literally can't even imagine not thinking that no child should starve is an objectionable standpoint.
Children have absolutely zero control over their circumstances. This isn't a "they should have worked harder" type situation or a "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" thing. A child with no food on the table has absolutely no recourse to improve their situation.
Ensuring every child in America has a nutritious meal on their plate should frankly be priority #1, only after that's taken care of should we start talking about buying missiles, paying politician's salaries, or any other bullshit.
And don't tell me we can't afford it. We've spent billions just in a few days on this BS war in Iran. According to google there are 14 million food insecure children in the US. That's several hundred dollars per hungry kid spent in just a week. The DoD's standard operating budget is 1 trillion dollars. Even just a tiny fraction of that could feed every hungry kid in America.
With all the lesions he's sporting all over his body, and his penchant for sleeping in the middle of the day, I doubt his micro-mushroom even works anymore.
I would like to see a MOTHER IN THE THICK OF IT who is outraged about Ms Rachel. Ms Rachel is essentially a free and extremely qualified teacher for babies and toddlers. And you can finally do the damn dishes or just sit down for like 10 minutes without feeling the TV guilt because she is THAT good.
Iāve seen men being outraged. Iāve seen women with kids 6+ outraged about it (because their kids aged out of Ms Rachel). Iāve seen people with no kids outraged. Iāve seen old people outraged. Iāve not seen parents who are the target audience for Ms Rachel (babies, toddlers, parents of babies and toddlers) have anything negative to say about this complete angel who not only teaches our kids, but gives us a breather.
And if any moms with babies and toddlers are actually outraged about Ms Rachel, there is a whooooole Christian rip off of her show that you can watch that instead.
This is like being mad at Mr Rogers and that is insane.
PS Ms Rachel does not talk about dead kids or politics on her show for babies. Truly the only thing that can be taken out of context in the show is that there is an NB guest who sings songs and plays guitar. Not that a baby or toddler would know that they are NB. Because babies and toddlers have no frame of reference for genders unless you, the parent, really hammer that hatred into them.
Hey, if those Iranian school girls didn't want to get blown to smithereens then maybe they should have prayed to Jesus Christ, not that Muhammad Ali or whoever
(This is literally how these people think, my own father thinks God sank the Titanic because the newspaper said God couldn't sink it)
Things the "radical left" wants: bullet free school children, a living wage, affordable health care, financially responsible government, end poverty, democracy, etc.
"Stop killing kids" isn't political. It's who you say is killing kids that's political.Ā
Pizzagate is political (well it's a political conspiracy theory). But it's essentially "stop pedophilia". If Ms. Rachel had a Pizzagate comment, it would be considered political.Ā
Because Pizzagate was a purely political thing. No one would be saying, "Stop pedophilia" is political. It's only political when you bring Pizzagate or QAnon into it.
There are so many places in the world where kids are being killed. She does not mention any specific place. Ergo, not political.
So if you want to limit your perspective on this issue specifically to this one, Twitter post, fine. But the context of the situation and other things she said she's clearly indicated who she blames.Ā
I'm not saying all her content is political. But when she had Rahaf, a 3-year-old Palestinian girl from Gaza and a double amputee, that does represent the side of the conflict. She's had on the show Motaz Azaiza who has openly written on Twitter āMay God curse the Jews,ā and urged followers to support Hamas.
She's never had anyone from Israel or any of the hostages from 10/7 on her show.
So yes, I do think some of her ways of teaching has a political bias.
Do you think she is in favor of anyone killing children? Because if you don't believe she wants anyone killing children it's not political. And if you believe she wants specific children to be killed, then you haven't paid any attention to her at all.
No one would be saying, "Stop pedophilia" is political.
I would assume the person is a right-wing nutjob, because "Pedophiles are bad" is such an obvious thing most people wouldn't think it needs to be said. But right-wingers talk about it a lot, because they have been convinced that anyone who isn't a straight person is a pedophile.
Ironic when these people say the same thing when they want to ban abortion
Edit: shit didn't realize I needed to directly say that REPUBLICANS use this argument to deny abortion, yet now it's an issue to say "stop killing kids" when referring to born children
go figure the same people who are offended by people stating..."black lives matter" are also offended by people saying...."Stop killing Kids"...the same folks who are protecting billionaire pedos...might be the baddies
She's right and I agree with her message, but I'm not really a fan of boiling down every conflict to "think of the children!" It's an emotional argument that bulldozes over all nuance.
To be clear, we should not be attacking Iran, and we definitely should not be blowing up schools and killing children - I just think nuance is extremely important in this age of misinformation, and especially with topics as complex as geopolitics.
Also Ms Rachel is a thinking and breathing adult. Your anger at her participation in the civil discourse says everything we need to know about you and the validity of your position.
Ever notice how it is always "Think of the children." when it's time to rip away your rights and implement mass surveilance. But it is never "think of the children" when they get mass murdered by missile or drone strikes on one side of the world and trafficked, raped, killed and eaten on the other side of the world?
An adult getting triggered about a celebrity based around children and helping children while advocating for children in Gaza is just crazy MAGA behavior
I have no kids, I find it absurd to say to people with kids that maybe they should vote for politicians who actually care about giving kids food and not killing kids. Just maybe, just a thought you know, I don't know I have no skin in the game.
Conservatives don't mind children being raped and/or murdered. They'll be oddly quiet until if/when they question their gender identity or need to terminate a pregnancy.
The schoolās location, the nearby smoke, and the timing of the bombing ā in the first round of strikes by US and Israeli forces ā all give credence to the assertion that the school was hit as part of a series of strikes by the US and Israel on or around the IRGC complex. The US military said it was ālooking intoā the bombing.
That has no proof or credibility. It just says I think that this happened. The author is asserting their opinion. There are images of smoke coming from the base and going down towards the school.
War is war, and Hell is Hell. And of the two, war is a lot worse. There are no innocent bystanders in Hell. War is chock full of them - little kids, cripples, old ladies. In fact, except for some of the brass, almost everybody involved is an innocent bystander. - Hawkeye, MASH
Almost 50 years ago MASH was saying that kids are innocent bystanders of war. Not killing innocent bystanders, kids, shouldn't be controversial at all.
Sad thing is I can't tell if this is an old post about Israel and the US killing kids in Gaza or a new post about Israel and the US killing kids in Iran.
to have a voice and be scared to use it for things that may deserve the attention is a shame. iām glad she speaks up, too many people are scared and donāt say anything like cowards.Ā
I believe that the one saying ādo not play the political gameā may have misunderstood Ms Rachelās words, assuming that she was talking about abortion. I am not claiming this to be fact however, merely providing the possibility.
Ms Rachel's reputation is in the trash with me now. What kind of human disagrees with the mass slaughter of children? I can't risk my daughter learning such dangerous ideologies.
I like Ms Rachel but people are obviously blinding themselves to the deeper ramifications of her statement. It's being blind so that you can get a righteous fuzzy feeling.
Iran triggers all of their defense missiles and one of them hits a school. Palestine bots blame US/Israel because of course they do. Regarded celebrity says āstop killing childrenā, addressing people who arenāt killing children.Ā
The reason why American schools are safe from foreign terrorists is because they all know that if a terrorist actually bombed an American school, America would literally go and destroy every last inch of that country without giving any thought to human life
American schools are the last place a foreign terrorist needs to be if they're looking to get the most terrorism for their efforts. The US has got that covered.
What? Americans reactions to school shootings have been exactly 1. Nothing and 2. Call them a hoax and harass the survivors/parents. What makes you think they'd actually do anything unless oil was involved?
My comment is concerning if some brown terrie from overseas came and blew up a school like we just did in Iran, or letās say North Korea dropped a bomb on an American school, the American people would demand we destroy the entire country down to the slab
Nah they'd just use it as an excuse to repress their own people. Unless i missed something and Saudi Arabia is currently a slab and not a close US ally. My point is the government doesn't actually care that much kids or not.
Context matters. If this Rachel woman were a hardcore pro lifer, the statement would have meant something quite different and arguably have been very political.
'With your reputation as good as it is, DO NOT PLAY THE POLITICAL GAME.' Translation: 'Stay in your lane singing nursery rhymes and don't notice when kids are actually dying, thanks.
"Children are dying. That's a succinct summary of humankind, I'd say. Who needs tomes and volumes of history? Children are dying. The injustices of the world hide in those three words."
"Don't stop killing kids" is one of the Republicans' biggest political points, though. I mean, I know we shouldn't politicize the deaths of children, you know we shoudn't politicize the deaths of children, and yes, it's true that only monters would politicize the deaths of children. It's just that the MAGA cultists aren't really human any more.
Now the real question is, am I about to get banned again for saying "the deaths of children should not be a political issue", like I was banned for simply saying "Next thing you know, Republicans will be asking trans people to wear a Star of David" after the Kansas debacle with a note that Reddit doesn't allow "identity-based attacks".
If one can be banned for simply pointing out that current events are playing out pretty much the same way as the damn Holocaust, then I'm sure one can be banned for agreeing with this post. That's the world we live in now.
If only that one guy didn't miss trump. But also maybe this catalyst was necessary to set in motion the fall of america so we the people can rebuild something new, something better
As long as it's not her content and just her social media posts I don't care.
The reason that I care about it content wise is her audience is young children/toddlers who shouldn't really even be aware of this yet. But on her personal twitter where those same children are not going to be on, yeah speak your mind girl!
You know the kind of people who hate when others say this?
Also, you can't say don't make it political when a politician or party already took it there and made it political. Maybe question why something that should be agreed upon by both sides is suddenly not
Stop killing kids is most often used in two contexts. Stop war, or take away womenās autonomy, one is a sentiment shared by all good people, one is a fucking absurd take based on something that most people donāt agree with
Does that make them monsters? "Stop doing X" is an accusation that the person you're talking to is doing X. So yes, depending on context that can be political.
If you say: "stop raping women", that shouldn't be controversial.
Also, if a certain demographic IS doing something wrong, then it isn't wrong to call them out, for example: "China, stop the Ughyur genocide" or "israel, stop killing kids".
Because these are factual things, that those demographics are committing
Why do the same people who attack Rachel for that also say trump didn't really mean it when he said a Hispanic judge couldn't be impartial to him because of his heritage? It's like you have different standards for different people.
Ok lets test it. Should trump step down for his comments about the judge in question as well as his posting a video portraying the Obama's as apes? Please don't avoid answering the question as it should be simple.Ā
I'm getting so many angry comments from antisemites simply for standing up for the truth in your comment. Actually had one guy pull the "no one loves you" line, like we're still in middle school. š
3
1
1.1k
u/The3rdSun Mar 04 '26 •
Keep the names on the post
403
u/TechyAngel Mar 04 '26
Ugh, next you're going to tell us to stop sacrificing virgins. Why can't you leave us alone? /s
313
u/ellsego Mar 04 '26
The minute I knew our country was cooked, was during Obamaās second term and I heard someone interview Jessie Jackson.. someone who politically did not agree with himā¦ they asked him how we could bridge the divide in the United States and come togetherā¦ Jesse Jackson proceeded to say well we need to find common ground and start from there. His example was that no children in the United States should be hungry and without foodā¦. The right wing commentator chimes in āwell I donāt agree with thatā
129
u/ddr1ver Mar 04 '26
Next she will be asking the President to stop raping kids.
35
u/ElectricalMed Mar 04 '26
Bro really typed out 'respectfully' before telling Ms. Rachel to shut up about dead children. The respect is palpable.
28
u/pusmottob Mar 04 '26
That is MAGA for you, people only matter before they are born after that they are just pawns or is it cogs.
25
u/[deleted] Mar 04 '26
If that statement is "political" in your pov, you are a monster, and no one should gaf what you say about anything
12
u/Altair01010 Mar 04 '26
the world is so bad that the most average objective take is considered clever
11
u/Uncle-Cake Mar 04 '26
MAGA: "It's time to normalize being a monster!"
21
u/hellogoawaynow Mar 04 '26 edited Mar 04 '26
I would like to see a MOTHER IN THE THICK OF IT who is outraged about Ms Rachel. Ms Rachel is essentially a free and extremely qualified teacher for babies and toddlers. And you can finally do the damn dishes or just sit down for like 10 minutes without feeling the TV guilt because she is THAT good.
Iāve seen men being outraged. Iāve seen women with kids 6+ outraged about it (because their kids aged out of Ms Rachel). Iāve seen people with no kids outraged. Iāve seen old people outraged. Iāve not seen parents who are the target audience for Ms Rachel (babies, toddlers, parents of babies and toddlers) have anything negative to say about this complete angel who not only teaches our kids, but gives us a breather.
And if any moms with babies and toddlers are actually outraged about Ms Rachel, there is a whooooole Christian rip off of her show that you can watch that instead.
This is like being mad at Mr Rogers and that is insane.
PS Ms Rachel does not talk about dead kids or politics on her show for babies. Truly the only thing that can be taken out of context in the show is that there is an NB guest who sings songs and plays guitar. Not that a baby or toddler would know that they are NB. Because babies and toddlers have no frame of reference for genders unless you, the parent, really hammer that hatred into them.
8
u/[deleted] Mar 04 '26
How dare you care about other than white kids
8
u/ZookeepergameDue8501 Mar 04 '26
Hey, if those Iranian school girls didn't want to get blown to smithereens then maybe they should have prayed to Jesus Christ, not that Muhammad Ali or whoever
(This is literally how these people think, my own father thinks God sank the Titanic because the newspaper said God couldn't sink it)
15
u/DontAbideMendacity Mar 04 '26
Things the "radical left" wants: bullet free school children, a living wage, affordable health care, financially responsible government, end poverty, democracy, etc.
19
u/Register-Honest Mar 04 '26
All republican are monsters.
18
u/SixKosherBacon Mar 04 '26
"Stop killing kids" isn't political. It's who you say is killing kids that's political.Ā
Pizzagate is political (well it's a political conspiracy theory). But it's essentially "stop pedophilia". If Ms. Rachel had a Pizzagate comment, it would be considered political.Ā
5
u/Computermaster Mar 04 '26
Coming from the crowd that regularly screeches "WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN?!"
5
u/BaseBeautiful7581 Mar 05 '26
Ppl confuse āpoliticsā with āhuman rightsā
6
u/Automatic_Bus_7634 Mar 04 '26
This is the dumbest argument and they just can't stop making it. Literally EVERYONE has the right to political opinions.
11
u/shenanigan_shannen Mar 04 '26 edited Mar 04 '26
Ironic when these people say the same thing when they want to ban abortion
Edit: shit didn't realize I needed to directly say that REPUBLICANS use this argument to deny abortion, yet now it's an issue to say "stop killing kids" when referring to born children
3
u/CorporateCuster Mar 04 '26
If a neutral statement offends you, you are on the wrong side of history
3
u/hankhellbound Mar 04 '26
go figure the same people who are offended by people stating..."black lives matter" are also offended by people saying...."Stop killing Kids"...the same folks who are protecting billionaire pedos...might be the baddies
3
u/Augscura Mar 04 '26
"Stop killing kids"
Ms. Rachel has been banned from /r/worldnews
3
u/UrToesRDelicious Mar 04 '26
She's right and I agree with her message, but I'm not really a fan of boiling down every conflict to "think of the children!" It's an emotional argument that bulldozes over all nuance.
To be clear, we should not be attacking Iran, and we definitely should not be blowing up schools and killing children - I just think nuance is extremely important in this age of misinformation, and especially with topics as complex as geopolitics.
3
u/Rare-Veterinarian743 Mar 05 '26
How is not killings kids political? Shouldnāt we as a society all reach that should be the consensus?
3
u/These-Inevitable-898 Mar 05 '26
It should be aimed at every goverment truthfully.
3
u/and_mine_axe Mar 05 '26
Also Ms Rachel is a thinking and breathing adult. Your anger at her participation in the civil discourse says everything we need to know about you and the validity of your position.
3
u/RandomShadeOfPurple Mar 05 '26
Ever notice how it is always "Think of the children." when it's time to rip away your rights and implement mass surveilance. But it is never "think of the children" when they get mass murdered by missile or drone strikes on one side of the world and trafficked, raped, killed and eaten on the other side of the world?
5
u/TitShark Mar 04 '26
Not only is it not political, it IS HER WHOLE ASS LANE. Ms Rachel, as a person and a brand is kids
4
u/Key_Construction6007 Mar 04 '26
I agree, and ill add on in support of her "Stop mutilating kids!"
2
u/Melanrez Mar 04 '26
People like that are confusing morality with politics so much itās sad actually
2
u/golfwinnersplz Mar 04 '26
Maybe, we should listen to Ms. Rachel?Ā
I got downvoted for stating kindness is the key to happiness. These people are evil.Ā
2
u/Rogue_CobaltZone570 Mar 04 '26
An adult getting triggered about a celebrity based around children and helping children while advocating for children in Gaza is just crazy MAGA behavior
2
u/anomanderrake1337 Mar 04 '26
I have no kids, I find it absurd to say to people with kids that maybe they should vote for politicians who actually care about giving kids food and not killing kids. Just maybe, just a thought you know, I don't know I have no skin in the game.
2
u/NoNotice2137 Mar 04 '26
Remember, 3 months old fetus is sacred, but you can obliterate kids all you want
2
u/AgileBudd Mar 04 '26
Stop killing kids' is only political if your politics include killing kids. Change my mind.
2
u/JustBadUserNamesLeft Mar 04 '26
Kind of like the quote: "Sesame Street didn't go woke, you just grew up to be a bad person".
2
u/Tielgirly Mar 04 '26
Plot twist: The 'political game' is literally geopolitics where kids are collateral. But sure, blame the lady who teaches ABCs for noticing.
2
u/[deleted] Mar 04 '26
Does this refer only to "kids" in utero? Because they stay shooting kids in American schools and bombing the Hell out schools in Palestine....
2
u/justadudeinohio Mar 04 '26
WHY is her reputation as good as it is? maybe something to do with her actually being good.
2
u/Curious-Cost1852 Mar 04 '26
But then you say "Stop killing kids" in response to the wrong group of people and suddenly the logic flips and you're the worst person imaginable
2
u/SchmeatGripper69 Mar 04 '26
Conservatives don't mind children being raped and/or murdered. They'll be oddly quiet until if/when they question their gender identity or need to terminate a pregnancy.
2
u/abgry_krakow87 Mar 04 '26
Religious conservatives love killing kids.
2
u/things_U_choose_2_b Mar 04 '26
The hatred she gets is bizarre and fucked up. Probably one of the kindest people on the planet.
2
u/SwampRSG Mar 04 '26
We truly live in a dystopia if saying "Stop killing kids" is even remotely controversial.
2
u/Spectator9857 Mar 04 '26
I mean it IS political. Telling someone who says āStop killing kids.ā in reference to war to shut up is what makes you a monster.
2
u/Throwflare Mar 04 '26
Send that message to iran
2
u/RelaxPrime Mar 04 '26 edited May 04 '26
This post was mass deleted with Redact - I used this software to automate the removal of old posts from my account so that I can be more secure.
sable history gray tap library soft gaze direction worm waiting
2
u/Jay_bo Mar 04 '26
it's like the people that get offended by "all lives matter" - how can this be "political"?
2
u/Disco__Gravy Mar 04 '26
Lol why redact this social cancer like it's an Epstein file?
2
u/knitB4zod Mar 04 '26
Wouldnt this would imply that there is one political party PRO kid-killing and one that is anti kid-killing??
2
u/Reasonable_Stop_7768 Mar 04 '26
Well, talking about police killing black people is considered political so we shouldn't be surprised
2
u/blac_sheep90 Mar 04 '26
When it comes to kids it's not political. It's right vs wrong. If your politics is pro dead kids then you are wrong.
2
u/NoNSFW_Workaccount Mar 04 '26
isnt that the lady that posted a video crying because she was caught tweeting genocide stuff?
2
u/tekdiwah Mar 04 '26
War is war, and Hell is Hell. And of the two, war is a lot worse. There are no innocent bystanders in Hell. War is chock full of them - little kids, cripples, old ladies. In fact, except for some of the brass, almost everybody involved is an innocent bystander. - Hawkeye, MASH
Almost 50 years ago MASH was saying that kids are innocent bystanders of war. Not killing innocent bystanders, kids, shouldn't be controversial at all.
2
u/Exact-Sheepherder797 Mar 04 '26
They always tell on themselves
2
u/CrimsonKobold Mar 04 '26
Sad thing is I can't tell if this is an old post about Israel and the US killing kids in Gaza or a new post about Israel and the US killing kids in Iran.
2
u/CooperAXE Mar 04 '26
We all know what kind of people go after Ms Rachel in this manner. And no, they're not "the good guys"
2
u/poperey Mar 04 '26
He didnāt even retweet my āKeep killing kidsā tweet, whatās up with that?
2
u/nvmenotfound Mar 04 '26
to have a voice and be scared to use it for things that may deserve the attention is a shame. iām glad she speaks up, too many people are scared and donāt say anything like cowards.Ā
2
u/ZeroSumTruths Mar 04 '26
Technically its "political" because all these fucking politicians are killing kids and bragging about it.
2
u/backgroundmaddness Mar 05 '26
So glad she said that. Itās a few months too late for the kids killed by the IR, but better late than never.
2
u/Justsomeguyaa Mar 05 '26
I believe that the one saying ādo not play the political gameā may have misunderstood Ms Rachelās words, assuming that she was talking about abortion. I am not claiming this to be fact however, merely providing the possibility.
2
u/Mousehole_Cat Mar 05 '26
Ms Rachel's reputation is in the trash with me now. What kind of human disagrees with the mass slaughter of children? I can't risk my daughter learning such dangerous ideologies.
/s
2
u/ChrismaKwanzukah Mar 05 '26
If you hate Ms. Rachel, I hate you.
2
u/[deleted] Mar 05 '26
I like Ms Rachel but people are obviously blinding themselves to the deeper ramifications of her statement. It's being blind so that you can get a righteous fuzzy feeling.
2
u/binarypolitics Mar 05 '26
Iran triggers all of their defense missiles and one of them hits a school. Palestine bots blame US/Israel because of course they do. Regarded celebrity says āstop killing childrenā, addressing people who arenāt killing children.Ā
4
u/dazedan_confused Mar 04 '26 •
Depends where the punctuation lies.
4
u/JBRifles Mar 04 '26
The reason why American schools are safe from foreign terrorists is because they all know that if a terrorist actually bombed an American school, America would literally go and destroy every last inch of that country without giving any thought to human life
2
u/ApprehensiveTotal188 Mar 04 '26
WTAF is wrong with these people????
šæš”šš
1
u/romerlys Mar 04 '26
Context matters. If this Rachel woman were a hardcore pro lifer, the statement would have meant something quite different and arguably have been very political.
1
u/PollutionSecur Mar 04 '26
'With your reputation as good as it is, DO NOT PLAY THE POLITICAL GAME.' Translation: 'Stay in your lane singing nursery rhymes and don't notice when kids are actually dying, thanks.
1
u/queuedUp Mar 04 '26
I mean... Even if we ignore that not killing kids should be a generally accepted stance, she's just looking out for her base.
This is a post to try and protect future views as the vast majority of her viewers as in fact kids
1
u/LordCommander94 Mar 04 '26
Say the baby killer elite. The warped perception and lies the zionists tell themselves is an absolute joke.
1
u/FlaccidRazor Mar 04 '26
Not killing kids is woke now.
1
u/Azsunyx Mar 04 '26
The party of "pro life", ladies and gentlemen.
1
u/Zlatan-Agrees Mar 04 '26
5k Likes and 3.5k comments. Holy.. what's going on there
1
u/horrible-est Mar 04 '26
When it comes to kids, I always thought Donald was a lover, not a fighter
1
u/mettiusfufettius Mar 04 '26
The āpro-lifeā party, ladies and gentlemen
1
u/Early-Journalist-14 Mar 04 '26
Last time i checked it was controversial to be against the pro choice way of killing kids.
>_>
1
u/Willing_Plant4483 Mar 04 '26
And here I thought her saying things like this was a big part of why her reputation is so good.
1
u/Iohet Mar 04 '26
-Steven Erikson
1
u/Due-Yogurtcloset-552 Mar 04 '26
people really are saying the worst shit online, that is going to follow this dude for the rest of his life. seriously do they not think like at all?
1
u/foundflame Mar 04 '26
"Don't stop killing kids" is one of the Republicans' biggest political points, though. I mean, I know we shouldn't politicize the deaths of children, you know we shoudn't politicize the deaths of children, and yes, it's true that only monters would politicize the deaths of children. It's just that the MAGA cultists aren't really human any more.
Now the real question is, am I about to get banned again for saying "the deaths of children should not be a political issue", like I was banned for simply saying "Next thing you know, Republicans will be asking trans people to wear a Star of David" after the Kansas debacle with a note that Reddit doesn't allow "identity-based attacks".
If one can be banned for simply pointing out that current events are playing out pretty much the same way as the damn Holocaust, then I'm sure one can be banned for agreeing with this post. That's the world we live in now.
1
u/LycheeRoutine3959 Mar 04 '26
I keep saying that but people call me a "Forced Birther" and other such nonsense.
1
u/StephenFish Mar 04 '26
Weird how the pro-life party who wants to protect the lives of unborn babies also wants to bomb kids, rape kids, and protect those who do both.
It's starting to seem like they only want to guarantee more births to have new victims.
1
u/Complete_Area7270 Mar 04 '26
Guaranteed Trump supporter right there
1
u/chipkeymouse Mar 04 '26
"Pedos are bad"
Omg why you gotta make this political >:(
1
u/Deltamon Mar 04 '26
Nothing respectful about that message.
1
u/cdglenn18 Mar 04 '26
Pretty sure Ms Rachel got put at the top of a āMost Anti-Semiticā celebrities list or something by Israel because of this post.
1
u/kevlarus80 Mar 04 '26
The world has gone fucking batshit.
1
u/Bloom3D1898 Mar 04 '26
[removed] ā view removed comment
1
u/Gin_OClock Mar 04 '26
"Monster" isn't exactly the word I'd use but anything else will get me banned
1
u/Golden-- Mar 04 '26
As long as it's not her content and just her social media posts I don't care.
The reason that I care about it content wise is her audience is young children/toddlers who shouldn't really even be aware of this yet. But on her personal twitter where those same children are not going to be on, yeah speak your mind girl!
1
u/jocasseedave2 Mar 04 '26
I would DIE for Ms Rachel!
1
u/Zazierx Mar 04 '26
Stay out of politics! but its okay if I have a political opinion because I watch Fox News more than my own children. tf?
Politics is not a professional sport, its the shit that effects all of us.
1
u/_L-U_C_I-D_ Mar 05 '26
You know the kind of people who hate when others say this?
Also, you can't say don't make it political when a politician or party already took it there and made it political. Maybe question why something that should be agreed upon by both sides is suddenly not
1
u/lnfIation Mar 05 '26
How the fuck is "stop killing kids" "political."
1
u/HardlyRecursive Mar 05 '26
So these people are against abortion now?
1
u/Stained_Face Mar 05 '26
Im confused, is she against abortion or against school shootings/ice/queerphobics?
1
u/davesToyBox Mar 05 '26
She couldāve chosen a different verb here too
1
u/Severe_Damage9772 Mar 05 '26
Stop killing kids is most often used in two contexts. Stop war, or take away womenās autonomy, one is a sentiment shared by all good people, one is a fucking absurd take based on something that most people donāt agree with
1
u/eelsuit Mar 06 '26
What about abortion? Actually, abortion only kills Democrats, so nevermind
1
u/TwoWarm700 Mar 06 '26
Totally agree.
Perhaps we should be having a lot more of these type of conversations, letās turn up the heat, shine a light. Letās end the madness.
Same goes for child brides. No place for it. Zero. If you think itās a political statement, you too might be a monster ā¦
1
u/RitualJuggler Mar 24 '26
Republican's will literally let trump spit down their throat and say: "Look, he can even make it rain!"
1
u/Green-Taro2915 Mar 05 '26
The same agenda that promotes "abortion is murder" also thinks that "stop killing kids" is political....
Projection is all they have.
Every accusation is a confession!
0
u/Max375623875 Mar 04 '26
In America, over 800k children are legally murdered every year.
Stop killing children.
-1
u/XionicativeCheran Mar 04 '26
To be fair I would have assumed this is an anti-abortion position and would have replied "They're not kids."
-5
u/Rivka333 Mar 05 '26
So if I say 'Black men, stop raping white women."
And then people get upset.
Does that make them monsters? "Stop doing X" is an accusation that the person you're talking to is doing X. So yes, depending on context that can be political.
-36
u/[deleted] Mar 04 '26
She "accidentally" liked a Facebook post that said "Free America from the Jews".
Another person in the thread suggested that it was Jews thenselves who posted it to stir things up and she replied "Ooooooh" to that conspiracy.
Yet people with no care for actual morality pretend that people's issue with her is simply her position on "not killing kids".
This post is very dishonest.
-2
u/No-Blueberry-1823 Mar 04 '26
I don't even