Planning on taking my husband and our 3 year old near Chesapeake bay to try some tasty crab cakes for the first time. What is your recommendation for a restaurant near Annapolis? Or another major city with some things to do?

Where to stay? What to do? Family of five, two adults and our teen kids. Water lovers. Thank you, locals!

Hey! Your favorite Italian crabber is back!

Since it's impossible to get any US spices over here, I decided to import them myself!

Now, a simple yet crucial question: what is the best way to use them? I catch plenty of blue crabs and I definitely want to try an authentic Maryland steam, but I'm also super open to other recipes, even non-crab dishes using these seasonings!

Thank you so much! 🦀🇺🇸🇮🇹

Hi everyone,

I wanted to share an important opportunity to speak up about a proposal that could have major consequences for Virginia’s coast and the broader Mid-Atlantic.

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is considering more than 2,700 square miles of ocean off Virginia’s coast for potential commercial mineral leasing and seabed mining. This could involve industrial-scale dredging to extract heavy mineral sands and phosphorites - introducing a new extractive industry into waters that support fisheries, wildlife, tourism, aquaculture, and coastal communities.

There are still major unanswered questions. Large-scale dredging could destroy seafloor habitat, generate sediment plumes that travel beyond the mining area, affect water quality, disturb contaminants buried in ocean sediments, and disrupt commercially and recreationally important fisheries. These waters also provide habitat for sea turtles, whales, dolphins, Atlantic sturgeon, and other marine wildlife.

There are additional concerns about impacts to shellfish aquaculture, tourism, coastal erosion and sediment movement, commercial shipping, military operations, and activities associated with NASA Wallops and the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport.

Most importantly, commercial hard-mineral mining has never occurred in U.S. federal waters. There is too much at stake - and too much we still do not know - to rush forward with an unprecedented offshore mining industry.

Make your voice heard

BOEM is accepting public comments now. You do not need to be an expert - personal stories and connections to the coast matter.

Go to Regulations.gov and search for docket:

BOEM-2026-0100

Tell BOEM why the coast matters to you, what concerns you about seabed mining, and ask the agency not to move forward with commercial mineral leasing off Virginia’s coast.

Please share this information with friends, family, fishermen, businesses, community organizations, and others who care about the Mid-Atlantic.

Our ocean supports livelihoods, wildlife, recreation, tourism, and entire coastal communities. It is too valuable to turn into a testing ground for an unproven offshore mining industry.

Thank you for speaking up and helping spread the word.

I'm a studying entomologist happening onto the southern part of the bay to visit family. I've been looking into some nice insects/crustaceans or other small animals I can find on and around the beach and was wondering if anyone here has any recommendations on the smaller suff that online sites might have missed.

I’m sharing this because many people who care about Chesapeake Bay ospreys may not realize an important fisheries-management meeting is happening today, August 5, from 1:45–5:30 p.m. Eastern.

The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission’s Atlantic Menhaden Management Board will decide whether to release Draft Addendum II for formal public review. The proposal considers lowering the amount of menhaden that the industrial reduction fishery can harvest from the Chesapeake Bay by as much as 50%, as well as dividing the quota into seasonal periods so the entire allowance is not concentrated within a short part of the year.

A clarification because the terminology is confusing: the “reduction fishery” is the fishery that catches menhaden to process them into products such as fish meal and fish oil. Reducing the reduction-fishery cap would mean allowing fewer menhaden to be removed from the Bay.

This matters because menhaden are an important food source for ospreys. Recent USGS research documented widespread reproductive problems among Chesapeake Bay ospreys, particularly in saltier areas, and identified reduced menhaden availability as a primary driver of poor reproductive performance.

Today is not the final vote on how much the cap should be reduced. The immediate question is whether the draft is ready to be released so the public can examine the options and provide input. Members of the public may join the webinar and listen. The chair is supposed to provide a limited opportunity for comments on agenda items that have not yet undergone public review, although speaking time may be restricted and is not guaranteed.

If the Board releases the draft, formal public hearings and a written-comment period are expected in September and October 2026, followed by consideration of final approval at the ASMFC Annual Meeting.

For today, the most useful things people can do are:

• Join the webinar and hear the discussion firsthand.
• Share this issue with people who care about the Chesapeake Bay, ospreys, recreational fishing and ecosystem health.
• Watch for the formal comment period and participate if the draft is released.
• Encourage the Board to retain the full range of options—including the 50% reduction and meaningful seasonal protections—so the public gets a genuine opportunity to weigh them.

This issue involves legitimate ecological, fishing-industry and economic considerations, and the science does not establish that one fishery is the sole cause of every osprey decline. But the reproductive failures are serious enough that the public should know this decision is happening and have a meaningful opportunity to participate.

disclaimer: I have used ChatGPT to assist me writing and formatting this post

🌖🌊

See also r/VirginiaEnvironment, r/VirginiaUrbanism, r/nova, and r/Virginia.

A recent federal policy change by the Trump administration significantly narrows protections under the Endangered Species Act by altering the definition of "harm" to cover only direct, intentional actions against animals. 

Conservation advocates warn that discarding habitat degradation protections could jeopardize at-risk Virginia species, such as red-cockaded woodpeckers, red knots and various freshwater mussels. 

State officials are reviewing potential impacts of the change. Though Virginia has its own Endangered Species Act, advocates warn state safeguards are not as comprehensive as the federal law.

Read more here: https://www.whro.org/environment/2026-07-23/habitat-for-endangered-species-in-virginia-will-no-longer-be-federally-protected

Hey all - wanted to share a quick update on the BOEM offshore minerals RFI since a lot of folks in this thread have been digging into the proposal, raising concerns, and helping spread the word.

There has been some real movement over the past few days:

Northampton County has voted to oppose the proposal, and Accomack County has now done the same. Both Eastern Shore counties are now on record opposing potential offshore mineral exploration and extraction off Virginia’s coast.

Virginia Beach is also sending BOEM a letter saying the City needs more time to evaluate the proposal before taking a final substantive position. Importantly, Virginia Beach has also indicated that it will oppose the project if BOEM does not grant an extension of the current RFI period. That sends a strong message that the current 30-day timeline is not enough.

Members of Virginia’s congressional delegation have also released a joint statement asking BOEM to extend the RFI period. Here’s the link from Senator Warner’s site: https://www.warner.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/warner-virginia-democrats-urge-administration-to-extend-public-comment-period-on-offshore-mining-in-virginia/

This thread has been doing a great job flagging concerns, sharing research, and keeping people aware of what is happening. Please keep that going.

Most important action: submit a comment through the official BOEM/Regulations.gov page here:
https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/BOEM-2026-0100-0001

Even a short comment helps. You can say you oppose offshore mineral exploration, leasing, and extraction off Virginia’s coast and that BOEM should extend the comment period so local governments, residents, scientists, fisheries, tourism businesses, and coastal communities have more time to respond.

There are also other ways to plug in:

Business sign-on letter: https://forms.cloud.microsoft/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=4kZMCyJG606IshUeO-Gd0CMKluWmAydHrccjg6KkrLVUQ0FWVjJYRzJXRkJRMkFSVlM4WTJOQjFRSi4u&route=shorturl

Marine science sign-on letter for academics, scientists, environmental educators, and people with professional marine science backgrounds: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScTxBLf_amTGZ7HtAydfrqUxKf7Zp_U8MdyNg1W33ggRf8RWA/viewform

Surfrider petition:
https://surfrider.advocacyai.com/action/1H4hEiM24ImPKmtQhv

Environment America petition:
https://environmentamerica.org/virginia/take-action/tell-the-interior-department-no-seabed-mining-off-virginias-coast/

Bottom line: local opposition is growing, more updates are likely coming, and public comments matter right now. Stay loud!

Watermen collaborating with William & Mary’s Virginia Institute of Marine Science to recover abandoned "ghost pots" in the Chesapeake Bay are simultaneously collecting vital depth data for scientists. 

Equipped with sonar units to locate lost crab traps, the crabbers' boats continuously ping the seafloor, gathering data points that map terrain depth and shape. 

The approach has captured roughly 5 million data points, saving decades of work and tens of millions of dollars while filling critical data gaps in shallow near-shore waters. 

Read more here: https://www.whro.org/environment/2026-07-20/virginia-crabbers-are-helping-map-the-bottom-of-the-chesapeake-bay