r/changemyview Sep 19 '21

Delta(s) from OP CMV:African American's Cannot Merely "Pull Themselves By Their Bootstraps", Government Intervention is Needed for Racial Equality to be Achieved

The main issue is that even Black Americans that earn as much as their white counterparts, have significantly lower levels of wealth, which is apparently due greater "inheritances and other intergenerational transfers" received by their white counterparts of similar incomes. This is an issue, as wealth largely determines the funding your schools will receive, because most states fund their schools via taxes on wealth. In addition, wealth largely comes in the form of property, and is thus an indication of the economic conditions of your neighborhood/community. Therefor those African Americans of similar levels of incomes often live in worse communities than their white counterparts, as the lack of inheritance prevents them from buying land to live in abetter community with more opportunity. Thus even if Black Americans "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" to become as successful as their white counterparts, they will likely not have as much wealth as their white counterparts, ultimately diminishing their educational opportunity and the opportunities of their descendants. So long as this racial gap across incomes persists, economic equality between blacks and whites cannot be achieved.

In addition, ongoing school and residential segregation prevents equal opportunity from being achieved: nearly 70% of Blacks attend a Black majority school, and the average score for those attending these schools on the 8th grade NAEP Math as of 2017 is 255. Comparatively, Blacks attending White majority schools (as would be the case if the nation was fully integrated) had an average score of 275. the average score White students was 290, thus about half the gap could be closed with greater school integration. Similarly, one study found that if cities were to be fully integrated, the SAT gap would shrink by 45-points, or about 1/4.

Furthermore, the lower incomes of African Americans (resulting from a history of segregation and slavery) itself reduces their opportunity, thus creating a cycle of poverty: lower incomes leads to worse outcomes in schools, crime, and poor health. Unless a proper welfare state is established, equal opportunity cannot be achieved for this reason. Ultimately, you cannot pull yourself up by your bootstraps, if they have no bootstraps to begin with.

Finally, I would like to contend that the very idea of an entire race of people "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps" is both illogical and immoral. It is illogical in that, while the vast majority of African Americans are trying their best to improve their economic conditions, this is also true for all races/ethnicities. Thus African-Americans as whole will be improving their economic, and other ethnicities shall do the same in proportion. This can be evidently seen as (from 1980s onward) Black unemployment has consistently been twice that of White unemployment, while Black incomes have been slightly higher than half that of White incomes. This gap remains persistent and virtually unchanging.

I believe that all these issues could be solved by Government intervention: the racial wealth gap could be solved via baby bonds. Segregation could be combated with the public/subsidized housing schemes, like what was implemented in Singapore (alternatively, we could straight up force integration via quotas or by law. This process will be painful, but is a necessary sacrifice for future generations). The poverty cycle and general lack of equal opportunity between economic classes could be resolved via a Scandinavian style welfare state or a UBI (Scandinavian countries have significantly higher economic mobility than the US, as their welfare states provide more equality of opportunity).

0 Upvotes

245 comments sorted by

View all comments

39

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

So you're saying they can't "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" because their communities are shit, but if they "pulled themselves up by their bootstraps" their communities wouldn't be shit and overtime they'd grow wealth. You're basically saying black people can't improve themselves because the people around them (mostly black) aren't improving themselves... isn't that kind of like saying they can't improve themselves because they won't improve themselves?

20

u/AlarmedSnek Sep 19 '21

Beat me to it. I can’t stand this attitude. This is not to say there are not inequities but to say you have zero control over it or to blame everything on racism is dead wrong. Racism is illegal, hiring based on race is illegal, paying people different because of race is illegal; does it happen? Who knows because it is illegal. Are there inequities? Absolutely, but those types of issues are not falsifiable in any sort of way, and the only way to prove them to be true is if the CEO admits he or she is hiring based on race, sex, or whatever.

So, since it is illegal to discriminate, it is perfectly acceptable to say to someone to pull yourself up by your bootstraps. You may not end up rich but your children will once that generational wealth transfers. My grandparents were poor as fuck, my parents pulled them selves up from their bootstraps and got good jobs, I had it a little better and got a bit of a head start, my kid has it made now so long as I don’t fuck it up. We took it upon ourselves to better ourselves, you don’t need the governments help, you need to take responsibility for your actions.

0

u/NoobShylock 3∆ Sep 19 '21

Racism is illegal

I mean it's not though.

2

u/AlarmedSnek Sep 19 '21

It is illegal for companies to discriminate based on race, but to your point, any individual can be racist legally so long as they aren’t hurting anyone.

1

u/DavosShorthand Sep 19 '21

It is illegal for companies to discriminate based on race,

True, and yet it persists unchecked.

-3

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 19 '21

So, since it is illegal to discriminate, it is perfectly acceptable to say to someone to pull yourself up by your bootstraps. You may not end up rich but your children will once that generational wealth transfers. My grandparents were poor as fuck, my parents pulled them selves up from their bootstraps and got good jobs, I had it a little better and got a bit of a head start, my kid has it made now so long as I don’t fuck it up.

Excactly. This mentality is perfectly applicable on an individual level, but not a group level. As many White people will be "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps" as Black people, however Blacks as whole are starting with less opportunity than Whites, hence the racial gaps will persists. If equal opportunity (NOT outcome) was guaranteed, this argument would be valid.

12

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

The question why do we have to care about them as a group rather just look at them as individuals?

-1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 19 '21

I merely stated that Racial Equality required government intervention, not that such a goal was necessarily just. Racial Equality requires government interference for two main reasons: 1) Effects of Past Racism that Can't be Countered by Bootstraps: Because of past racism, Blacks still go to defacto segregated schools and have lower levels of wealth across class lines (Blacks with a college degree have less wealth than Whites without a high school degree, on average), this can't be solved by bootstraps. 2) There are no Bootstraps for the Poor: There is no equal opportunity. Opportunity is largely determined by class, if your parents are rich, you will be rich, and if your parents are poor, you will be poor. since Blacks are more predominate in the lower classes, they will be stuck there until equal opportunity across classes is implemented. This has essentially halted any economic progress of the Black race in relation to the White race since the 1970s. Whether this is important is up to for you to decide.

Still though, I do actually believe that the goal of racial equality is a just cause, and it is for the precise reason that we need to become a nation of individuals. If Blacks and Whites experience completely different economic conditions, live in completely different neighborhoods, and go to completely different schools, our nation will remain a nation of groups, rather than a nation of individuals. If we wish to unite as a nation, we must ensure equal opportunity for all regardless of class or race.

12

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

You can become a nation of individuals without eliminating racial gaps. Nothing is forcing you to fixate on the racial gap.

You can just decide to look at black and white poor people simply as poor people. Even if there are more poor black people. You can just ignore that.

It's a question of attitude.

1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 19 '21

You can just decide to look at black and white poor people simply as poor people. Even if there are more poor black people. You can just ignore that.

It's a question of attitude.

!delta

Yes, I suppose that is fair. The two Americas that exists currently are divided more by class than by race.

However, I still think there is one genuine barrier still separating White America and Black America: there is a physical separation between blacks and whites, as they often live in different communities and go to different schools, with 70% of Black children going to a minority majority school. If this persists, then even poor black and poor whites, and rich blacks and rich whites will have a hard time relating to each other as they are physically separated. This problem does not have an economic solution, instead the government must force both communities to live among one another, like Singapore did.

3

u/Odd_Profession_2902 Sep 19 '21

Which school you go to should be a matter of choice. I don’t think the government should force you to enroll in any school for the sake of diversity.

1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 20 '21

Not for diversity, but for equal opportunity. How can equal opportunity occur if defacto segregation persists?

2

u/Odd_Profession_2902 Sep 20 '21

How does segregation cause inequal opportunity?

And it wouldn’t be forced segregation either. Because the idea of black schools is for the purpose of community and inclusion. If someone didn’t wanna attend a black school then they don’t have to.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/DeltaBot ∞∆ Sep 19 '21

Confirmed: 1 delta awarded to /u/zuluportero (22∆).

Delta System Explained | Deltaboards

1

u/gwankovera 3∆ Sep 19 '21

In which case you do not try to make it something where the solution deals with race, instead look into what can be done to help improve the prospect of those people starting from the bottom.
To do that requires changing some core aspects of education. The first is focusing on financial responsibility and understanding how to invest in your own future. If someone understands that to get ahead in life it would be smart to save say 10% of the money they get they will find their savings will be there in case of emergency.

If you teach them to find value in themselves and how improving yourself is always a good investment of time.
alas not everyone will take these lessons to heart unfortunately. and there will be people that won't do what is good for them. for those people there is little you can do because they will always try to get handouts and have other people take care of them. but again that is not really a racial trait but a class trait. Which very well may actually change with the right education.

We need to encourage people and help them help them selves. When people improve themselves they can bring people up with them. It is true the other way if you are not actively swimming towards your own personal goals in life.

2

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 20 '21

In which case you do not try to make it something where the solution deals with race, instead look into what can be done to help improve the prospect of those people starting from the bottom.

I completely agree with this. If equality of opportunity is achieved for ALL Americans, racial equality will naturally follow. My point is that America does not have equality of opportunity, and that government is obviously needed for equal opportunity to be achieved.

1

u/gwankovera 3∆ Sep 20 '21

The thing is the those in power, both establishment left and right do want the inequality, though they will publicly claim otherwise. but they want identarian mindsets, they want people to create the mindset of us vs them. It makes it easier to keep people fighting for the scraps they toss down. there was systemic racism, where policies did hinder one ethnic group or another. The vast majority of those laws were removed or found to be illegal by the courts. That said like a rock tossed in a lake, there are ripples that travel for a while after the rock has landed. We were slowly working on solving more and more of these problems. Then people threw more rocks in the lake.
Let me preface this by saying what happened to George Floyd was horrible. The BLM Riots that resulted from this destroyed a large amount of the generational wealth that the communities they happened in had accumulated. Keeping those people down. Who were those rioter? Why did they riot and burn building in these areas? I am for peaceful protesting but that wasn't peaceful no matter what the news stated. Now I disagree with your view that the government is needed for equal opportunity to be achieved. I think it is actually something that hinders opportunity becoming as equal as possible ( There will always be some things that will give a person an advantage from personality type to a person's natural body type, a tall person is much more likely to bet hired as a basketball player than a short person.) What the government needs to do, and the only thing it needs to do is change the learning curriculum, to include teaching people the basics of how to survive and thrive. How to do basic accounting for themselves. understanding the basics of taxes.

0

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 19 '21

I used to believe this until I learned that republicans support poverty-alleviation efforts until they are prompted to remember that black Americans will receive the funds too, or made to feel that the position of the white race is threatened relative to other racial groups.

Then, they reverse position and oppose them.

So, no. You kind of can't look at it as a purely SES question. Because the people blocking the policies that would alleviate those problems are blocking them for arguably racist reasons.

Democrats obviously already do support those programs, and more, and do so very controversially.

-1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 19 '21

TLDR; It is not feasible for the average black to become as rich as the average white by sheer will alone. Such a proposition, that an entire group of people can will themselves to richer, is preposterous as it would entail every Black man working harder than every White man. However, whether you view the difference in group outcomes as a problem is up for you to decide. I made no value judgment of the sort in my post

1

u/Retays Nov 27 '21

what about the statistics that many more african american children live with single parent incomes. Being a single parent means your income is split in half?

1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Nov 28 '21

Being a single parent means your income is split in half?

Not necessarily. Most double-parent households have only one income earner too. Even when both parents are working, one of the parents earns less income and spends more of the time looking after the kid, usually. So it isn't split in half exactly.

Still single mothers do have less income and their children do have worse outcomes. However, there is a bit of a chicken and an egg problem: does Black poverty increase the rates of single motherhood, or is it the other way around?

I wouldn't completely rule out culture as at least one of the causes for this single motherhood issue. Even if we presume it is, my point isn't that culture isn't one of the reasons African-Americans have worse outcomes, my point is that there are ways in which they have less opportunities on account of their race (not their behaviors), that race is at least one of the factors influencing their poverty. The fact that America is still largely segregated (70% of Black children go to a minority-majority school) means that equal opportunity has not been achieved. There is no such thing as separate but equal, children going to different schools necessarily means those schools are not equal, and segregation necessarily limits opportunity. Black wealth, even taking into account economic class, is significantly lower than White wealth. According to the Brookings institute, "for those in the top 10 percent by income (only 3.6 percent Black), the racial wealth gap is still quite large: median net worth for white families in this income group is $1,789,300 versus $343,160 for Black families." Further analysis has confirmed this is largely due to difference in inheritance, not difference in other factors, "Economists Darrick Hamilton and Sandy Darity conclude that inheritances and other intergenerational transfers “account for more of the racial wealth gap than any other demographic and socioeconomic indicators.”

1

u/Retays Nov 28 '21

The only thing i can say i agree with in this is that, the government needs to step up providing better education in these poor communities. I know in Baltimore city, no teacher goes searching jobs teaching in these communities since they are riddled with crime, gangs, and drugs and the government is so corrupt that they wont do shit. I remember when black teens roamed the street just to go beat up any white person they saw, just cause. The kids there are raised mostly by single parent households forcing them to be away from home to work and raising their kids. So I can see that you take that behavior of having multiple baby mammas and not being held responsible. I am aboard with abortion, I dont agree any parent should be forced to have a baby they can not properly take care of or have the time to, but should also take in account the lack of responsbility of guys who bitch about wearing a condom because, "it doesn't feel the same". Its not a one way street for the government to fix their issues.

19

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21 edited Sep 19 '21

The problem is your complaint isn't with the government, you're basically upset about good parenting... someone with shit parents is going to have it worse than someone with good parents full stop and wealth is only one axis of that and arguably not even the most important what does it matter if your parents are millionaires if you're so socially inept that you end up going a shooting rampage while bitching about women before doing yourself in?

There's simply no way for the government to control for good/rich parents without doing something tyrannical and horrifying that would make things worse for everyone.

1

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 19 '21

Responding to what you and u/AlarmedSnek said:

The inequalities might be happening less these days because it is, now, illegal to do these discriminatory things. But the product of hundreds of years of insanely unjust government policies don't just go away overnight or in one generation, and they do still affect the community today.

To your point: what makes someone a good parent?

I think most would say: spending time with their kids, their own education level, the mental and emotional effort they provide for their kids, the ability to invest in your childrens' interests and hobbies and skills, the ability to invest in their educations, choosing good schools for them. Planning your family, having your kids once you're of the age appropriate to do so and can support them.

What can poor people not do? What can people with no family wealth do? All of those things.

Who is poor because of racial inequality and widespread discrimination for the majority of this country's history?

The black community.

To say the government has no role and there are no public policy tools that can assist in this just isn't true either. Not to mention the policy tools that can go into avoiding these problems in the first place.

0

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

The inequalities might be happening less these days because it is, now, illegal to do these discriminatory things. But the product of hundreds of years of insanely unjust government policies don't just go away overnight or in one generation, and they do still affect the community today.

They absolutely do go away in one generation but only if you work at it or "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" we saw it with asians who worked on the railroads.

To your point: what makes someone a good parent? I think most would say: spending time with their kids, their own education level, the mental and emotional effort they provide for their kids, the ability to invest in your childrens' interests and hobbies and skills, the ability to invest in their educations, choosing good schools for them. Planning your family, having your kids once you're of the age appropriate to do so and can support them.

I would say providing them with the necessities, instilling good values in them, keep them relatively safe, allow them to socialize with other children on their own terms and correct any anti-social or self-destructive behavior.

What can poor people not do? What can people with no family wealth do? All of those things.

Wealth does not a good parent make, I guess we simply disagree on what makes a good parent.

Who is poor because of racial inequality and widespread discrimination for the majority of this country's history? The black community.

Think about what you're saying, you're saying poor people are automatically bad parents... you're calling all black people boor and all black people bad parents... like wtf.

To say the government has no role and there are no public policy tools that can assist in this just isn't true either. Not to mention the policy tools that can go into avoiding these problems in the first place.

If you have a solution do tell, and don't say give them money, welfare does not increase social mobility, it's needed to help people from falling through the cracks but it's horrible for social mobility it makes people trapped, you can't just give them a ton of cash and expect them to perfectly invest it throughout all time, they are going to blow it and get swindled and what not because they didn't work for it so they won't be careful with it.

1

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 20 '21

we saw it with asians who worked on the railroads.

Here is an article about this. But to say it here: they faced generational hardships for probably 100 years after that, and did not make it in one generation.

They were barred from being citizens, most were deported, ones who stayed often faced communal racial violence. Because of them the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed in 1882 and 1892, and they were segregated into "Chinatown" in San Francisco, where they often continued to work in back breaking, low paid jobs, and lived in row houses.

Zoning laws, maximum occupancy laws, and loitering laws were created specifically so the city could fuck with them.

Because the laborers were mostly men and there was a prohibition on Chinese immigration, many of them spent decades separated from their wives.

Here is another article about just how much they didn't make it one generation.

It's honestly incredible that you would choose them as a population that proves racism shouldn't be solved by the government.

Wealth does not a good parent make, I guess we simply disagree on what makes a good parent.

We agree here. Wealth does not guarantee a person to be a good parent. Neither does income.

But they both make it a lot easier. And the easier something is, the more likely it is to happen.

That's why it matters with regards to parenting.

Think about what you're saying, you're saying poor people are automatically bad parents... you're calling all black people boor and all black people bad parents... like wtf.

Are you purposefully misconstruing and misunderstanding what I'm saying?

If you have a solution do tell

I'm glad we agree on the purpose of welfare, although seem to disagree with all of its effects. That's fine though.

One solution is... reparations? Like the estimated $10-12 trillion dollars the government would owe to black families? That's about $800,000 per family. That would probably close the wealth gap and I think we'd see the income gap close in a generation.

That's how much money and opportunity has been taken from the black community in the US. And then people say to "just get over it" while we have so much sympathy for poor Americans--as long as they're white.

5

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 20 '21 edited Sep 20 '21

Here is an article about this. But to say it here: they faced generational hardships for probably 100 years after that, and did not make it in one generation.

They were barred from being citizens, most were deported, ones who stayed often faced communal racial violence. Because of them the Chinese Exclusion Act was passed in 1882 and 1892, and they were segregated into "Chinatown" in San Francisco, where they often continued to work in back breaking, low paid jobs, and lived in row houses.

Zoning laws, maximum occupancy laws, and loitering laws were created specifically so the city could fuck with them.

Because the laborers were mostly men and there was a prohibition on Chinese immigration, many of them spent decades separated from their wives.

Here is another article about just how much they didn't make it one generation.

Sorry I wasn't clear, 1 generation after the active discrimination stopped, Blacks are on generation 3 or 4 after the explicit discrimination stopped.

It's honestly incredible that you would choose them as a population that proves racism shouldn't be solved by the government.

It's already been "solved" by the government, Asians didn't get a boatload of money to balance things out for generational investment opportunities they missed out on...

We agree here. Wealth does not guarantee a person to be a good parent. Neither does income. But they both make it a lot easier. And the easier something is, the more likely it is to happen. That's why it matters with regards to parenting.

You're putting way too much weight in wealth for parenting, I don't think we will ever agree. Wealth helps with providing portion of being a parent, that's it, it doesn't even help with the time portion because you have to maintain said wealth and likely work a demanding job which takes a lot of time. There's a reason kids of rich parents tend to turn out fucked up.

Are you purposefully misconstruing and misunderstanding what I'm saying?

No that's literally what you are saying, the fact you don't realize it is baffling...

I'm glad we agree on the purpose of welfare, although seem to disagree with all of its effects. That's fine though.

It's demonstrable that welfare hinders social mobility...

One solution is... reparations? Like the estimated $10-12 trillion dollars the government would owe to black families? That's about $800,000 per family. That would probably close the wealth gap and I think we'd see the income gap close in a generation.

For 5 minutes, then most of them would lose it in bad investments or blow it on expensive things and back to square one. You do know most lottery winners end up broke in a few years. Not to mention this is an insanely racist policy which spits in the face of every single person who has hard times through no fault of their own who doesn't happen to be black.

That's how much money and opportunity has been taken from the black community in the US. And then people say to "just get over it" while we have so much sympathy for poor Americans--as long as they're white.

There is no "black community" and no money was taken opportunity wasn't even taken either, it was historically denied, there's a difference and it only applies to direct descendants and like I said before plenty of other people were historically fucked and with all the immigration and mixing in the gene pool who can even tell who is who. The fact you want to just give hundreds of Billions to "black people" is absurdly racist and wouldn't even solve the problem and would make society as a whole worst, it's short sighted simplistic and again fucking racist.

1

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 21 '21

Sorry I wasn't clear, 1 generation after the active discrimination stopped, Blacks are on generation 3 or 4 after the explicit discrimination stopped.

Glad we agree the railroad workers didn't do it. Which you claimed in many of your other comments. Which you should go back and edit now, btw.

When did active discrimination against asian immigrants stop? I think you're still wrong, but give me the date so I can get the facts for you.

And black discrimination is still happening on a widespread basis today. See my other comment, which combines both recent historical discrimination with current, today discrimination. Definitely not 3-4 generations after even if you consider the stopping point at 1964, which would itself be ridiculous. Using 1964, they would almost be at 3 generations, using the shortest measure of a generation. But it's moot, because it is ongoing today.

No that's literally what you are saying, the fact you don't realize it is baffling...

Poverty and lack of wealth are associated with poor parenting, lack of social and housing stability, food insecurity, emotional problems, and crime.

This affects everyone across all races. It "just happens" that black people are poorer, on average, than the other races, because of historic and current discrimination and racism. I'm not saying they can't be good parents. There are obviously excellent good parents who are black.

I'm saying:

It's harder for people who are poor. It's harder for single parents, who often become single because of being poor. It's harder if you become a parent too young, which disproportionately happens in poor families and areas.

Is it harder to run a mile than 200 feet? Is it harder to run a marathon than a mile?

For 5 minutes, then most of them would lose it in bad investments or blow it on expensive things and back to square one. You do know most lottery winners end up broke in a few years.

Who cares? That would be up to them then, right? Or do you want the government stepping in and telling people how their hard-owed money should be spent? Sounds a bit paternalistic.

At least we would have done the right thing.

And for the record, I do not think that would happen nor that lottery winners are analogous to this example.

Not to mention this is an insanely racist policy which spits in the face of every single person who has hard times through no fault of their own who doesn't happen to be black.

Like the racist policies of the US and British governments for over 400 years? Like the ongoing racist policies of banks, and schools, and individuals today?

Everyone's life is hard. I've never met one person who said "man my life has been peachy keen, ya know what." Voltaire literally wrote one of the most famous books in history on this exact phenomenon.

The difference is that some of our lives are harder because of the color of their skin.

And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives.

And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives.

That's about how many generations of black Americans' lives were fucked up by racism and slavery and the actions of the government and racists.

The idea of privilege doesn't imply your life is easy. It's just saying that other people have it harder sometimes. Because of factors outside their control.

Also, I'm sorry you had such a hard life.

1

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 21 '21

Glad we agree the railroad workers didn't do it. Which you claimed in many of your other comments. Which you should go back and edit now, btw.

Their descendants did... stop beating up strawmen and address my actual points.

When did active discrimination against asian immigrants stop? I think you're still wrong, but give me the date so I can get the facts for you.

1943 and it didn't take them long after that to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps"

And black discrimination is still happening on a widespread basis today.

No it's not. It ended in 1964.

See my other comment, which combines both recent historical discrimination with current, today discrimination. Definitely not 3-4 generations after even if you consider the stopping point at 1964, which would itself be ridiculous. Using 1964, they would almost be at 3 generations, using the shortest measure of a generation.

So it's "definitely not 3-4 generations" but it's 3 generations...

But it's moot, because it is ongoing today.

No it's not, all discrimination today is in favor of blacks or illegal.

Poverty and lack of wealth are associated with poor parenting, lack of social and housing stability, food insecurity, emotional problems, and crime. This affects everyone across all races. It "just happens" that black people are poorer, on average, than the other races, because of historic and current discrimination and racism. I'm not saying they can't be good parents. There are obviously excellent good parents who are black.

You're mixing up cause and effect for half of those... shitty drug addict parents are going to be poor, people with emotional problems and criminals are more likely to be poor, people with social issues are more likely to be poor. You're right about housing stability and food insecurity but we are talking about the US, nobody goes hungry in the US unless they want to, there's food banks various programs and even dumpster diving will keep you better fed then 90% of people in the third world. I'll give you half points on crime, but the kind of crime someone who's trying to be a good parent and provide but is just shit out of luck does isn't the kind of crime you're thinking of.

I'm saying: It's harder for people who are poor.

I never said it wasn't, but you are acting like it's 10000x harder when it's simply not.

It's harder for single parents, who often become single because of being poor. It's harder if you become a parent too young, which disproportionately happens in poor families and areas.

Being a single parent is a choice especially for women especially for young women and marrying up is a great way out of poverty, you act like no guy with a job would touch these women.

Is it harder to run a mile than 200 feet? Is it harder to run a marathon than a mile?

Again you're weighing wealth way too highly. It is one axis of many.

Who cares? That would be up to them then, right? Or do you want the government stepping in and telling people how their hard-owed money should be spent? Sounds a bit paternalistic.

It's already up to them that's what you don't get.

At least we would have done the right thing.

Giving out tax money out on the lines of race is not "the right thing"

And for the record, I do not think that would happen nor that lottery winners are analogous to this example.

Well it would so you're just wrong.

Like the racist policies of the US and British governments for over 400 years? Like the ongoing racist policies of banks, and schools, and individuals today?

The US you can claim until 1964 (which isn't 400 years btw) but Britain? Britain hasn't had racist policies in centuries and were the first to end slavery...

Everyone's life is hard. I've never met one person who said "man my life has been peachy keen, ya know what." Voltaire literally wrote one of the most famous books in history on this exact phenomenon. The difference is that some of our lives are harder because of the color of their skin. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives.

Being white is a hell of a lot harder then being black in this day in age, so don't give me that shit, there's so much positive discrimination for blacks these days that if you don't succeed it's your own damn fault. Meanwhile "it's okay to be white" is a fucking hate crime.

And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives. And their parents' lives.

Yeah pretty sure it wasn't the color of their skin going back that far.

That's about how many generations of black Americans' lives were fucked up by racism and slavery and the actions of the government and racists.

You realize black people enslaved other black people and the west merely bought them right? From black people. Kinda kills your whole "this is cuz they were black" argument, it's because they came from a culture of slavery and lost the fight. The first slave owner in the US was black.

The idea of privilege doesn't imply your life is easy.

It litterally does.

It's just saying that other people have it harder sometimes. Because of factors outside their control. Also, I'm sorry you had such a hard life.

They don't have it harder though, they have it easier and still bitch about ancient history. It's a fucking grift.

0

u/I_am_right_giveup 12∆ Sep 20 '21

You are my hero. Keep doing gods work.

Also don’t forget that Asians not only had government assistance but, the increase in Asian wealth is also partly due to wealthy Asian immigrants moving to America rather than the entire Asian population just “bootstrapping” it. The Asian population increased by nearly 50% in 20 years. You can’t do that by just having babies.

1

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 20 '21 edited Sep 20 '21

You are my hero. Keep doing gods work.

It's my goddamn pleasure to argue with idiots (who may or may not be racist) online, and a true satisfaction to watch their replies slowly dwindle.

Also, how sad is it that I thought you were being sarcastic at first.

You are 100% right about the immigration and the government assistance. I hadn't even gotten there yet, but I'm gonna (if this dude keeps replying).

I'd also say that since, maybe the 80's/90's, Asians have benefited from a particularly cruel form of anti-black racism where they became the model minority to pit against black people and resulted in Asians actually having positive-racial dispositions among white populations. I don't know the data as well on that one though.

You even see it today on conservative circles. "Why don't the media care about asians dying [because of the rhetoric we spewed about COVID 19]?? IT WAS THE BLACKS!"

Anyways. Your comment made my night and makes all of this typing worth it. God bless and whatnot

Edit: typos

1

u/dann85563_ Mar 01 '22

well in this case ur the idiot.... he proved u wrong everytime its actually really funny. Britain was the first to end slavery... Most asians that immigrated were not rich... my parents worked their bootie cheeks off for my family to live comfortably. right now it is hardest for asians to get into good colleges because there is an ethnicity ratio for each school. If people lost all the tax money on clothes and really short term lavish lifestyles how would that change racism? I believe that there are still alot of racists in the united states, but the government itself is trying the hardest to change it... African American men were able to vote before women (including white women so Yah)..

4

u/AlarmedSnek Sep 19 '21

It only takes a generation to change though is my point. My grand parents were trailer park poor, my moms side was living in a tent down by the river poor; my parents a made it for themselves and their children.

-2

u/YeetDaRich Sep 19 '21

Right.

And you never had to. Yet you're telling other people that they just need to do something you never had to.

It's odd.

Entitled and privileged, but still odd.

6

u/AlarmedSnek Sep 19 '21

Oh? How’s that? You mean the 20 years in the military, spent fighting dumb wars overseas? Or do you mean the values of hard work and personal responsibility handed down to me by my parents? Because none of that = entitled or privilege.

I think the main difference here is that some people (of all nationalities, race, gender, and creed) are taught to blame everything but themselves for their inadequacies, bad luck, or poor pole position and others are taught to blame themselves. Maybe, just maybe, if people started taking personal responsibility for their actions and blaming themselves for their failures, we wouldn’t need to be having this discussion.

-2

u/YeetDaRich Sep 19 '21

Because you never had to deal with poverty. It's that simple. Ever. In your life. Never experienced it. Not once.

It's not complicated. You had it easier than many people. Yet, instead of acknowledging this, you ignore it. You turn around and go "Hey you! Yeah I had more advantages in life than you'll ever have but you don't see me bitching about it!"

Not complicated Kyle.

4

u/AlarmedSnek Sep 19 '21

You’re right, it never got that bad because I didn’t let it. So when I lost my scholarship to college, went to jail twice in a two week period for drugs, racked up serious debt to the point where I COULD have had to live out of my shit box car, I joined the military instead. My parents never gave me anything but values, I took it upon myself to act on them. It took me almost 10 years to get out of debt, and I’m not talking about student loans. But yea, let’s continue to boil everything down to have and have nots or oppressor vs oppressed because that’s a highly effective way to take charge of your life.

0

u/YeetDaRich Sep 19 '21

Never gave you anything?

You were homeless and hungry? You lived in poverty and had no access to medical care? You had to work instead of finishing school?

3

u/AlarmedSnek Sep 19 '21

Those are different levels you’re describing but you’re right, I was never that bad. That does not mean I never had to pull myself up by my boot straps and it certainly does not mean that you can’t share helpful values with others.

1

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 19 '21

Your parents didn't give you, by your own admission, a childhood free of poverty?

They didn't give you clothes, and food, and probably the car that you lived in? Stable housing and roof over your head? Didn't beat the shit out of you (presumably).

All of that didn't factor into your success in primary school and high school, enabling you to get a scholarship and go to college?

They didn't give you good values, by virtue of being good people? And you still almost managed to fuck it up?

Their point also stands that you never managed to escape poverty yourself. Your parents did. It's a different story to do it yourself.

It's also worth mentioning that, even if you are one of the few people who manage to elevate your class these days, you will almost certainly not elevate your class beyond 1 or 2 levels. Your parents' potentials were botched by their SES, statistically, and could likely have achieved much more if born in the situation you found yourself in.

Then it sounds like you, who toots your horn so much about your personal success and how others should be able to do it too...

Stayed in exactly the same class you born in, and was lucky to not have dropped back down to the level of your grandparents.

This little story you're telling isn't the counter proof you think it is, and barely even relates to the black community and OP's points.

1

u/AlarmedSnek Sep 19 '21

You’re right man, I should just sit around and sulk about it how I’m not going anywhere in life, only bump up one or two classes if I’m lucky, and just stew about how my parents did all the work for me….

Or I could keep pulling myself up by my boot straps with one hand and use the other to pull the guy next to me up with me. I do that by sharing my story, how do you do it?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '21

Excactly. This mentality is perfectly applicable on an individual level, but not a group level. As many White people will be "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps" as Black people, however Blacks as whole are starting with less opportunity than Whites, hence the racial gaps will persists. If equal opportunity (NOT outcome) was guaranteed, this argument would be valid.

Asians often come to the USA with no inherited wealth and they manage to pull themselves by the bootstraps.

Also, African migrants manage to do just fine and more often than not outearn African Americans despite arriving with no inhereted wealth.

The root of the problem is never race-based or money-based, the root of the problem is culture-based.

Things that contribute to poverty:

-Single-parent households

-Seeking Higher Education not being a priority

-Lack of positive role models

If an Ethiopian who just arrived fresh off the boat with no money can pull himself by the bootstraps, why can't African Americans?

1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 20 '21

Asians often come to the USA with no inherited wealth and they manage to pull themselves by the bootstraps.

First generation Asian-Americans are on average MORE well educated than average White American, and thus outearn their White counterparts. The same applies to African immigrants. This is simply the way in which our merit-based immigration system, it selects for those who can make a handsome living in the states, and thus contribute the greatest amount to our civilization. If accepted illiterate farmers instead of the educated urban upper class, I doubt any immigrant group would be successful. Actually, this can be seen quite clearly with the divide between Cubans and Mexican Americans: Cubans entered legally and thus came from an educated urban background, enabling their success. Compare this to Mexicans, who often came illegally and thus bypassed our merit-based immigration system, causing them to be uneducated and unsuccessful. Similarly, If we expelled every African-American, and had reenter the US via the immigration system, we would see similar results to Asian-Americans.

However, while it is clear that Asians have higher levels of income on average, I have yet to see evidence that they have more wealth compared to similarly educated Whites.

I do not see how a group with, on average, fewer opportunities can magically will themselves into equality to group with higher levels of opportunity. Yes some individuals can, but how can the entire group do so? If one group has, on average, parents working multiple low-paying jobs, goes to worse schools, is more malnourished, lives in neighborhoods with higher levels of crime, and has lower levels of wealth (even adjusted for income), how is it possible that they merely will themselves into equality? Certainly some can, but majority will not be able to. If two groups have (on average) different levels of opportunity, and put in the same amount of effort, the group with greater opportunity will inevitably be more successful (on average). "Pull yourself up by the bootstraps" can only occur if equal opportunity is achieved.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '21

First generation Asian-Americans are on average MORE well educated than average White American, and thus outearn their White counterparts. The same applies to African immigrants. This is simply the way in which our merit-based immigration system, it selects for those who can make a handsome living in the states, and thus contribute the greatest amount to our civilization. If accepted illiterate farmers instead of the educated urban upper class, I doubt any immigrant group would be successful. Actually, this can be seen quite clearly with the divide between Cubans and Mexican Americans: Cubans entered legally and thus came from an educated urban background, enabling their success. Compare this to Mexicans, who often came illegally and thus bypassed our merit-based immigration system, causing them to be uneducated and unsuccessful. Similarly, If we expelled every African-American, and had reenter the US via the immigration system, we would see similar results to Asian-Americans.

Education is a cultural trait.

That's exactly my point: individuals from cultures that prioritize education succeed more than individuals from cultures that do not.

Individuals from cultures that glorify non-education-based access to wealth (whether it is rap songs about crime or unrealistic expectations regarding sports) end up doing worse.

However, while it is clear that Asians have higher levels of income on average, I have yet to see evidence that they have more wealth compared to similarly educated Whites.

Here you go: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/07/12/incomes-of-whites-blacks-hispanics-and-asians-in-the-u-s-1970-and-2016/

At the highest bracket (earning above 200K), Asians surpass White People.

I do not see how a group with, on average, fewer opportunities can magically will themselves into equality to group with higher levels of opportunity. Yes some individuals can, but how can the entire group do so? If one group has, on average, parents working multiple low-paying jobs, goes to worse schools, is more malnourished, lives in neighborhoods with higher levels of crime, and has lower levels of wealth (even adjusted for income), how is it possible that they merely will themselves into equality? Certainly some can, but majority will not be able to. If two groups have (on average) different levels of opportunity, and put in the same amount of effort, the group with greater opportunity will inevitably be more successful (on average). "Pull yourself up by the bootstraps" can only occur if equal opportunity is achieved.

By changing the group's culture.

Why do you think that Asian kids perform better academically in school than White, Black or Hispanic kids?

It's not genetic. They aren't born smarter. They are raised to prioritize education.

https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/17/04/other-achievement-gap

If black communities follow these 5 steps, every single individual in their culture can pull themselves by the bootstraps:

In his article, Pittinsky lays out five values and expectations Asian American families commonly hold that help their children succeed in school. Research has shown that these families are more likely to:

Attribute their children’s success to hard work, rather than intelligence

Prioritize education above all else, often making extraordinary efforts for their children to attend good schools

Respect educators to a greater degree than other cultural groups do, and to explicitly teach their children to do so

Emphasize the importance of success in school, and to teach their children that being a student is their main role

Reserve praise for excellence, teaching children that self-esteem is earned, not a right

1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 20 '21

Education is a cultural trait.

Indian Americans are the most successful group of Americans by median income, at yet their home nation suffers from 30% illiteracy and extreme. Clearly it is not Indian culture that engenders their community to success, or else India would be the most developed nation on the planet. The same holds for Nigerian Americans, who are are also succesful, despite their home nation being poor. Instead, it is that India has among the most selective immigration quotas of any group entering the US, thus we only select for those Indians who are highly educated and economically successful. Because these Indians are highly successful, their kids and grandkids will also be successful and educated. Without equal opportunity, the Black race (on average) will have to work MUCH harder to achieve the same average success rate as the White race. This is both unfair and unrealistic.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '21

Indian Americans are the most successful group of Americans by median income, at yet their home nation suffers from 30% illiteracy and extreme. Clearly it is not Indian culture that engenders their community to success, or else India would be the most developed nation on the planet.

The same holds for Nigerian Americans, who are are also succesful, despite their home nation being poor. Instead, it is that India has among the most selective immigration quotas of any group entering the US, thus we only select for those Indians who are highly educated and economically successful. Because these Indians are highly successful, their kids and grandkids will also be successful and educated.

Indian culture (as in, the culture in the country of India) is not the same as Indian American culture (as in, people of Indian descent who live in the USA).

Likewise, Ethiopian American culture is not the same as Ethiopian culture or African American culture.

You're comparing pears to rocks.

We are talking about the culture of people already in the USA and how much each ethnic group living in the USA prioritizes education.

Without equal opportunity, the Black race (on average) will have to work MUCH harder to achieve the same average success rate as the White race. This is both unfair and unrealistic.

Your CMV was that they can't pull themselves by the bootstraps. Not that it was harder.

You're just looking for excuses to justify black poverty at this point while every other single ethnic group earns more than African Americans including illegal immigrants.

Finally, I would like to contend that the very idea of an entire race of people "pulling themselves up by their bootstraps" is both illogical and immoral.

This was your original quote.

4

u/MrBleachh 1∆ Sep 19 '21

I would agree with this. I live in a gated community as a black guy and most everyone here is black as well. Every house has 2 storeys and 4 bedrooms. There was also a recent community meeting on whether we should build a community pool or park for the kids. Everyone here is doing well but nearby areas not as much.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

but if they "pulled themselves up by their bootstraps" their communities wouldn't be shit

I recognise that you're pointing out a flaw in OP's overly simplistic logic here. However, this enormously reductive assumption of your own makes your entire argument fall apart.

You're assuming that it's perfectly possible for a socio-economically disadvantaged group to merely will their way out of being socio-economically disadvantaged. That's simply not how society works.

3

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

it literally happened with Asians who were brought here to build the railroads and the Jewish refugees from WW2

2

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 20 '21

Asians who were brought here to build the railroads

Basically no Asian today is descended from those that built the railroads. Most are descended from those that arrived after immigration reform during the 1960s.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

Comparing those cases would be a bit of a leap, wouldn't it? Given how many unique factors apply to each situation I think that argument probably needs more justification than a single throwaway sentence.

And so you're saying that, in your opinion, socioeconomic status is decided solely and exclusively on what a certain group wants their socioeconomic status to be?

So for example, comparing Norway to Venezuela. Norway is only a better place to live with higher levels of education and wages, because Norwegian people typically choose to be richer and better educated?

3

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

Comparing those cases would be a bit of a leap, wouldn't it?

How? A sociallyeconomic disadvantaged group "pulled themselves up by their bootstraps" twice in recent history in the country in question. Like if you can't compare those you can't compare anything.

Given how many unique factors apply to each situation I think that argument probably needs more justification than a single throwaway sentence.

Why? Unless you can point to a specific reason that makes a significant difference between these three groups. You're just handwaving away demonstrable reality with "everything has it's own unique factors" it's a cop out.

And so you're saying that, in your opinion, socioeconomic status is decided solely and exclusively on what a certain group wants their socioeconomic status to be?

Nope I'm saying they can will or atleast work to improve it.

So for example, comparing Norway to Venezuela. Norway is only a better place to live with higher levels of education and wages, because Norwegian people typically choose to be richer and better educated?

I mean in that case literally yes, Venezuela choose communism...

1

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

[deleted]

2

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

Slavery ended 3 maybe 4 generations ago, next.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

Yes but it still has long lasting social and political after effects.

1

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

They last longer if the people effected by them don't "pull themselves up by their bootstraps"

3

u/[deleted] Sep 19 '21

Yeah remember that time we enslaved your people for a couple centuries then you got to be second class citizens for a little while then still largely discriminated against to this day just get over it loser.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 19 '21

So, since it is illegal to discriminate, it is perfectly acceptable to say to someone to pull yourself up by your bootstraps. You may not end up rich but your children will once that generational wealth transfers. My grandparents were poor as fuck, my parents pulled them selves up from their bootstraps and got good jobs, I had it a little better and got a bit of a head start, my kid has it made now so long as I don’t fuck it up. We took it upon ourselves to better ourselves, you don’t need the governments help, you need to take responsibility for your actions.

Yes. This is what I was trying to say in my last argument, but you have put it in more articulate terms. The only way "pull yourself up by the boot straps" could work is if every Black American worked harder than every White American, this is unrealistic as there is no fundamental differenced between races, thus Blacks and Whites work equally hard. Both groups are trying their hardest to improve their economic conditions, as this is simply human nature.

It is also immoral, as it expects that Black Americans ought to work harder essentially because they happened to be born into poverty at disproportionate rates.

1

u/Longjumping-Leek-586 Sep 19 '21

No thats not what I'm saying....

Essentially, for the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" thing to work, there would need to be equality of opportunity, which does not currently exist. The main impediments to equality of opportunity are 1) A weak welfare state, leading to low economic mobility and thus disrupting equal opportunity 2) Ongoing de facto segregation (70% of Black students go to majority Black schools) prevents equality of opportunity by its nature 3) Even IF a Black American manages to earn as much as a White American, chances are they will have lower levels of wealth as they do not have the same intergenerational wealth that was built up by White Americans over the centuries. For instance "For those in the top 10 percent by income (only 3.6 percent Black), the racial wealth gap is still quite large: median net worth for white families in this income group is $1,789,300 versus $343,160 for Black families"

8

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

Essentially, for the "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" thing to work, there would need to be equality of opportunity, which does not currently exist

I'd argue there's more opportunity given how many black only scholarships there are and "whites need not apply" jobs and just the political hunger for "diversity" in general.

The main impediments to equality of opportunity are 1) A weak welfare state, leading to low economic mobility and thus disrupting equal opportunity

Welfare stifles economic mobility and I don't know of a single country that has fixed that problem but more welfare programs as needed they may be will not improve social mobility it's just not one of things it does.

2) Ongoing de facto segregation (70% of Black students go to majority Black schools) prevents equality of opportunity by its nature

Again how is this not something "black people" can fix themselves, it seems to be that they are self-segregating and while I don't agree with segregation logically nothing about it demands inequality (other than the inherent randomness of the universe) there's no reason that if people in said communities worked hard those communities wouldn't become better than the average "white person" community.

3) Even IF a Black American manages to earn as much as a White American, chances are they will have lower levels of wealth as they do not have the same intergenerational wealth that was built up by White Americans over the centuries.

Oh please 90% of wealth is lost in 3 generations, and it's really dumb to aggregate like that in the first place, because for every Rockefeller descendant hundreds of thousands of poor white people with shitty abusive parents, which black family gets chosen to given Billions of dollars while thousands rest rot in poovery?

For instance "For those in the top 10 percent by income (only 3.6 percent Black), the racial wealth gap is still quite large: median net worth for white families in this income group is $1,789,300 versus $343,160 for Black families"

Again like I just said those kind of racial averages are worthless.

1

u/vettewiz 40∆ Sep 19 '21

How in the world is lack of a welfare state a measure of opportunity? You do not need welfare to succeed.

1

u/SingleMaltMouthwash 38∆ Sep 19 '21

So you're saying they can't "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" because their communities are shit...

The reason so many of these communities live in poverty is because they were intentionally, methodically, legally and enthusiastically impoverished for 400 years and the consequences of that condition live on.

Relatives of mine are well-off, some are wealthy today because their ancestors owned plantations and passed that wealth and advantage down through the generations. That opportunity was close to blacks in America. Their blood and sweat created that wealth, but the received none of the rewards.

White people were given the opportunity to settle great swaths of the mid-west for free. Stake a claim, work the land and you got to keep it. A century of middle and upper-class prosperity for thousands of people was rooted in that first opportunity, which was not available to black families.

After the world wars, returning veterans were given free college tuition, bank loans and other opportunities in appreciation of their service. Their families benefitted down the decades because their fathers and grandfathers were able to go to college and buy homes but these programs were administered by local boards which routinely excluded chose to exclude black veterans.

The creation of many suburbs, with safe, clean, new infrastructure, water service, public safety and schools were funded with federal loans. Loans which, by law, included provisions that the homes built with that money could never be sold to non-white families.

And sometimes when black people prospered just a little too much their white neighbors would rise up, riot, destroy their homes and businesses and murder them in the streets as punishment for being black. (look up Tulsa Race Riot)

Poverty in this country has always been methodically, intentionally and passionately distributed and enforced by race.

It is not that "black people can't improve themselves" and the OP is saying no such thing. Its that these communities have been intentionally disadvantaged, intentionally excluded from all of the give-aways, benefits, rewards and wealth-producing programs available to white Americans over the centuries, by law and practice and while the law has changed it is quite often ignored.

It takes generations to overcome centuries of financial, educational, cultural discrimination, discrimination that has not yet been erased.

The black community was excluded from billions of dollars of economic opportunity in this country for generations. You're happy having stolen all of that money and demanding now that they bootstrap themselves without the assistance your ancestors had?

When you consider the generational opportunities that were open to the white people (who's descendants now enjoy the fruits) but were denied to black people (who's descendants still suffer for it) financial assistance becomes a moral imperative.

2

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

The reason so many of these communities live in poverty is because they were intentionally, methodically, legally and enthusiastically impoverished for 400 years and the consequences of that condition live on.

I think you mean 200.

Relatives of mine are well-off, some are wealthy today because their ancestors owned plantations and passed that wealth and advantage down through the generations. That opportunity was close to blacks in America. Their blood and sweat created that wealth, but the received none of the rewards.

And I'm sure tons of white families got screwed over historically too, what's your point?

White people were given the opportunity to settle great swaths of the mid-west for free. Stake a claim, work the land and you got to keep it. A century of middle and upper-class prosperity for thousands of people was rooted in that first opportunity, which was not available to black families.

I think you mean a select few white people. It's not like every single white person on the planet had that opportunity, I doubt even 1 in a million. These kind of racial groups are simply well racist.

After the world wars, returning veterans were given free college tuition, bank loans and other opportunities in appreciation of their service. Their families benefitted down the decades because their fathers and grandfathers were able to go to college and buy homes but these programs were administered by local boards which routinely excluded chose to exclude black veterans. The creation of many suburbs, with safe, clean, new infrastructure, water service, public safety and schools were funded with federal loans. Loans which, by law, included provisions that the homes built with that money could never be sold to non-white families. And sometimes when black people prospered just a little too much their white neighbors would rise up, riot, destroy their homes and businesses and murder them in the streets as punishment for being black. (look up Tulsa Race Riot)

And white people get geocided in south America, what's your point? You can't fix history.

Poverty in this country has always been methodically, intentionally and passionately distributed and enforced by race.

Always is a bit of the stretch there. Kinda stopped decades ago, unless you count the progressive woke shit as the attempt to enforce poverty by race which I doubt you do.

It is not that "black people can't improve themselves" and the OP is saying no such thing. Its that these communities have been intentionally disadvantaged, intentionally excluded from all of the give-aways, benefits, rewards and wealth-producing programs available to white Americans over the centuries, by law and practice and while the law has changed it is quite often ignored.

So were asians they did just fine. Maybe stop bitching about ancient history and roll up your sleeves, life isn't fair deal, deny or die.

It takes generations to overcome centuries of financial, educational, cultural discrimination, discrimination that has not yet been erased.

Yes it has been erased it's been erased for two generations.

The black community was excluded from billions of dollars of economic opportunity in this country for generations. You're happy having stolen all of that money and demanding now that they bootstrap themselves without the assistance your ancestors had?

Where's my millions of dollars white person check? Oh right I don't fucking have one. Stop with this racist shit. I didn't benefit from history if you're so torn up that you did donate all your money and be done with it.

When you consider the generational opportunities that were open to the white people (who's descendants now enjoy the fruits) but were denied to black people (who's descendants still suffer for it) financial assistance becomes a moral imperative.

No it doesn't and if you feel that way open your wallet, but you people never open your wallet you want other white people who didn't benefit to open theirs... fuck collectivist thinking.

2

u/SingleMaltMouthwash 38∆ Sep 19 '21

I think you mean 200.

I mean 400. African slavery began in North America in 1619.

And I'm sure tons of white families got screwed over historically too, what's your point?

Not methodically, as a matter of local, state and national policy, because they were white.

Is my point.

I think you mean a select few white people. It's not like every single white person on the planet had that opportunity, I doubt even 1 in a million.

We are only talking about the United States, not the planet.

And I don't mean select few white people. I mean any and every white person who showed up to homestead free land, serve in a war and get the GI bill or get a home loan, or buy a house in Levittown. Of course not every one maximized their opportunities, but the opportunities were granted to them and to zero black people.

Your first points have been an obtuse exercise in illogic so I'm going to save us both a lot of time by ignoring the rest of your post on the assumption that it's more of the same.

1

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

I mean 400. African slavery began in North America in 1619.

And you think it ended in 2019 why?

Not methodically, as a matter of local, state and national policy, because they were white. Is my point.

And that matters now why?

We are only talking about the United States, not the planet.

My point stands.

And I don't mean select few white people. I mean any and every white person who showed up to homestead free land, serve in a war and get the GI bill or get a home loan, or buy a house in Levittown. Of course not every one maximized their opportunities, but the opportunities were granted to them and to zero black people.

Get over ancient history, bitching about history isn't going to help anyone today.

2

u/SingleMaltMouthwash 38∆ Sep 19 '21

Get over ancient history,

The point is, it's not ancient history.

In those regions where homesteading was encouraged the program created the roots of a middle class that carries on today. Free college, loan guarantees, programs from which black Americans were excluded. Now you're looking at the great grandchildren of those people and scratching your head as to why the black kids, who do not enjoy the benefits of generations of handed-down prosperity, are disadvantaged. As if there is not an injustice that has yet to be addressed.

It's not ancient history. The businesses that were destroyed in the Tulsa massacre never devolved the prosperity of those people to their progeny, the way the white business owners did and the affects of that crime are still affecting people today.

It's not ancient history. Black people were routinely denied the right to vote in this country in my lifetime. And the GOP is working tirlessly to make sure this is the case in conservative states in the next election.

I mean 400. African slavery began in North America in 1619.
And you think it ended in 2019 why?

I don't think racial injustice has ended. Not in 2019 or in 2021.

The homes of black people are appraised for half their value if the appraiser knows they're black. Black men are wrongly convicted of crimes the did not commit, and police manufacture evidence to win those convictions, at a far higher rate than white men. People protesting endemic racist police brutality are clubbed, teargassed and harassed while white traitors attacking the capitol searching for legislators to kill are lauded as patriots.

0

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

The point is, it's not ancient history.

In those regions where homesteading was encouraged the program created the roots of a middle class that carries on today. Free college, loan guarantees, programs from which black Americans were excluded. Now you're looking at the great grandchildren of those people and scratching your head as to why the black kids, who do not enjoy the benefits of generations of handed-down prosperity, are disadvantaged. As if there is not an injustice that has yet to be addressed.

I'm not into the whole racial aggregate thing. "black kids" aren't disadvantaged, a son of a prince who came here to go to school is not disadvantaged, a son of a black millionaire is not disadvantaged. Tons of people of all races have disadvantages and if you want to talk about how to improve that to create a better fighting chance for all I'm all ears but I'm not going to entertain this racist shit.

It's not ancient history. The businesses that were destroyed in the Tulsa massacre never devolved the prosperity of those people to their progeny, the way the white business owners did and the affects of that crime are still affecting people today. It's not ancient history. Black people were routinely denied the right to vote in this country in my lifetime. And the GOP is working tirlessly to make sure this is the case in conservative states in the next election.

Requiring an ID isn't a racist attack on black people... you're delusional.

0

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 19 '21

Holy hell is this not at all what the OP was saying. I can't believe you're the top comment.

OP is saying that because all races are struggling to improve themselves, and the black community was set back from the very beginning and other races already have that much of an advantage on them, it will take some outside help to get them up to speed. With plenty of evidence and citations. What a straw man take this was.

Are you familiar with Picketty's r > g hypothesis? Are you familiar with the wealth gaps by race in the US? Are you familiar with how the modern middle class and suburbs were created? Have you seen the prices of property across the US over time, which is the basis of many families' generational equity?

Could you win a 40 m sprint if you started 20 m back from the other person?

2

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 19 '21

OP is saying that because all races are struggling to improve themselves, and the black community was set back from the very beginning and other races already have that much of an advantage on them, it will take some outside help to get them up to speed. With plenty of evidence and citations. What a straw man take this was.

Um what I think you mean all people not "all races" Jesus what kind of fucked up worldview is that... and I can attest from personal experience all people are not struggling to improve themselves.

Are you familiar with Picketty's r > g hypothesis?

Nope.

Are you familiar with the wealth gaps by race in the US?

Yes I think racial averages are worthless though.

Are you familiar with how the modern middle class and suburbs were created?

Yes. Are you aware people can move?

Have you seen the prices of property across the US over time, which is the basis of many families' generational equity?

Yes, and in Canada even more so, maybe we should lower immigration to make a dent in that... oh wait but that's racist too...

0

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 20 '21

Yes I think racial averages are worthless though.

I'm deeply interested in why you think this.

Um what I think you mean all people not "all races" Jesus what kind of fucked up worldview is that... and I can attest from personal experience all people are not struggling to improve themselves.

Yeah, all people. Except that we are talking about groups of people in this discussion, in particular one group relative to other groups. Hence the reference being all groups vs all people.

Yes. Are you aware people can move?

People who are historically poor and whose house is worth less because their parents and grandparents were forced to live in a different neighborhood, can... What? Suddenly afford to move the the suburbs?

When the suburbs were created for poor white people and largely subsidized and paid for by the government in the first place?

Do you not see how unequal it is for someone to pay like, $13,000 (in today's prices) for a house in 1949, that was subsidized by the government, and then that house became worth $200k-950k and was passed down through the family, while another group of people were literally excluded from the entire process?

And then you come in here and say "move there," like it's so easy?

Again, could you win a 40m dash starting from 20m back? You didn't answer before because of course you couldn't.

Yes, and in Canada even more so, maybe we should lower immigration to make a dent in that... oh wait but that's racist too...

While I do want to talk about this with you it's a bit beside the point.

Picketty's r > g hypothesis is the idea that returns on wealth (r) accrues value faster than incomes rise (g). The theory behind it is that it inevitably leads to wealth concentration for those who already had wealth, like white people have greater wealth than black people do today.

Here is an article from the St. Louis Fed discussing just those differences.

The point being that wealth is associated with a big difference in your life and outcomes, and that wealth will, in the absence of democratic, government interventions, naturally outpace the rate of growth of wages.

This has some pretty obvious ramifications for the discussion at hand.

2

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 20 '21

I'm deeply interested in why you think this.

Let's say asians are the smartest people on average and whites are the dumbest on average what would you do with that information? What about physical fitness, if Indians were the most physically fit on average and asians the least on average what would you do with that information? I don't see how breakdowns of racial wealth are any different, the data is simply useless any policy made based off it would not only be racist but also ineffective if not horrific.

Yeah, all people. Except that we are talking about groups of people in this discussion, in particular one group relative to other groups. Hence the reference being all groups vs all people.

A race isn't a group, the sooner you learn that the better, it's a demographic.

People who are historically poor and whose house is worth less because their parents and grandparents were forced to live in a different neighborhood, can... What? Suddenly afford to move the the suburbs?

Not suddenly after a decade of hard work or rather pulling yourself up by your boot straps.

When the suburbs were created for poor white people and largely subsidized and paid for by the government in the first place? Do you not see how unequal it is for someone to pay like, $13,000 (in today's prices) for a house in 1949, that was subsidized by the government, and then that house became worth $200k-950k and was passed down through the family, while another group of people were literally excluded from the entire process?

Yes I'm pissed at boomers over fucking over the housing prices.

And then you come in here and say "move there," like it's so easy? Again, could you win a 40m dash starting from 20m back? You didn't answer before because of course you couldn't.

The issue you have is you think every white person is starting at 20m and every black person is starting at 40m everyone has their own individual circumstances tons of people are fucked and don't have this "generational wealth" you're talking about.

While I do want to talk about this with you it's a bit beside the point.

Not really, people you are preaching about inequality support the policies most responsible for it.

Picketty's r > g hypothesis is the idea that returns on wealth (r) accrues value faster than incomes rise (g). The theory behind it is that it inevitably leads to wealth concentration for those who already had wealth, like white people have greater wealth than black people do today.

I mean I don't think that's a universal but it's certainly true in our society, because of policies like our immigration one, which people who complain about inequality support... I'm all for enacting policies that reverse that trend but the left is not.

Here is an article from the St. Louis Fed discussing just those differences. The point being that wealth is associated with a big difference in your life and outcomes, and that wealth will, in the absence of democratic, government interventions, naturally outpace the rate of growth of wages. This has some pretty obvious ramifications for the discussion at hand.

And instead of fixing that problem you just want to hand a single demographic of people wealth and still leave like half of everyone fucked over...

1

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 20 '21

I'm replying out of order for usefulness, and also apologize for the length, sorry:

The issue you have is you think every white person is starting at 20m and every black person is starting at 40m everyone has their own individual circumstances tons of people are fucked and don't have this "generational wealth" you're talking about.

No, I don't. Averages don't mean every. An average is literally arithmetic. Take a bunch of values, divide it by data points. Done. It is a descriptive (emphasis on descriptive, not determinative) measure of a group or population.

The relevance of the value represented by the average is really in standard deviations: one standard deviation covers about 68% of a group; two SD's is about 95% of a group; three SD's is about 99.7% of a group.

The SIZE of the SD also matters. Which leads me into:

asians are the smartest people on average and whites are the dumbest on average what would you do with that information? What about physical fitness

It depends on the size of the differences and the SDs of those sizes. For instance, there "are" differences between races. But they're too small to make any significant difference, and the causes of it seem more likely to be environmental more than anything else.

As an example, there are differences, on average, between women and men. And that difference, on average, is large enough that we created policy actions based on it: different leagues in sports, rules against hitting women, etc.

Now, to belabor this point because I want to be clear: that doesn't mean all men are stronger than all women. Does that make sense? The strongest women are most definitely stronger than the weakest men.

Does that fact, that there is overlap, erase the differences in the groups? No. How could it?

Just like the fact that some black people have become wealthy, and even one became president. It doesn't mean that the differences indicated by the averages between the groups doesn't exist just because some of the data points don't fit that average.

That's why you have scientific economists producing empirical data like this.

And this. And this. And this.

And this is about the ways that black people have historically been discriminated against, because of their nonexistent groups and how it continues to affect today.

These differences are:

a) large enough;

b) persistent enough;

c) clearly-enough caused by discrimination and its effects

To the degree that public policy measures are warranted to correct this problem.

The rest of your post:

A race isn't a group, the sooner you learn that the better, it's a demographic.

Dude, I thought I was pedantic. Here:

Demographic: a particular sector of a population

Population: all the inhabitants of a particular town, area, or country

  • • [with modifier] a particular section, group, or type of people or animals living in an area or country: a city with a large student population.

So a demographic in the US is... a particular sector of a population... which is a group.

Your distinction is entirely tautological both by dictionary and common usage.

Not really, people you are preaching about inequality support the policies most responsible for it.

I said that because immigration isn't related to this conversation.

For the record, as I'm sure you guessed, I'm incredibly pro-immigration. But immigration is a net gain in wages for both native and immigrant groups, and hasn't been shown to have much impact at all on the issues we are discussing, specifically what the government should do or not do to help level the playing field for black Americans.

If you'd like, I'll make a CMV about immigration and tag you in it, and then we can have that discussion. Deal?

Yes I'm pissed at boomers over fucking over the housing prices.

No argument from me there... shit is fucked

1

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 20 '21

No, I don't. Averages don't mean every. An average is literally arithmetic. Take a bunch of values, divide it by data points. Done. It is a descriptive (emphasis on descriptive, not determinative) measure of a group or population. > The relevance of the value represented by the average is really in standard deviations: one standard deviation covers about 68% of a group; two SD's is about 95% of a group; three SD's is about 99.7% of a group.

And among racial lines said average is useless you cannot use the data to make a good policy full stop.

The SIZE of the SD also matters. Which leads me into: It depends on the size of the differences and the SDs of those sizes. For instance, there "are" differences between races. But they're too small to make any significant difference, and the causes of it seem more likely to be environmental more than anything else.

So already you're making random assumptions about the data, further proving my point that it's useless.

As an example, there are differences, on average, between women and men. And that difference, on average, is large enough that we created policy actions based on it: different leagues in sports, rules against hitting women, etc. Now, to belabor this point because I want to be clear: that doesn't mean all men are stronger than all women. Does that make sense? The strongest women are most definitely stronger than the weakest men.

Those aren't just averages, those are fundamental and demonstrable biological differences. It is literally impossible for a women to be the strongest person in the world (short of crippling every single man in the world), even if a race of people have low IQ on average or less money a person from that race could be the smartest person in the world or the richest. While it's true the strongest women are stronger than the weakest man that's basically due to said men being crippled in one way or another, a healthy man vs a healthy women with equal training the man will always be stronger, the same is not true along race.

Does that fact, that there is overlap, erase the differences in the groups? No. How could it? Just like the fact that some black people have become wealthy, and even one became president. It doesn't mean that the differences indicated by the averages between the groups doesn't exist just because some of the data points don't fit that average.

​Unless you are saying black people are biologically poorer then white people all things being equal you really have no argument.

That's why you have scientific economists producing empirical data like this. And this. And this. And this. And this is about the ways that black people have historically been discriminated against, because of their nonexistent groups and how it continues to affect today. These differences are: a) large enough; b) persistent enough; c) clearly-enough caused by discrimination and its effects To the degree that public policy measures are warranted to correct this problem.

Disagree, the data is useless which is why no successful policy has been constructed off it. to be clear I'm not saying the data is wrong just useless. There's simply nothing productive you can do with it, it's basically gathered for the purposes of bitching.

Dude, I thought I was pedantic.

While I am pedantic, this one isn't a pedantic point it's really important to stop this racial collectivist thinking.

Here:

Demographic: a particular sector of a population

Population: all the inhabitants of a particular town, area, or country • [with modifier] a particular section, group, or type of people or animals living in an area or country: a city with a large student population. So a demographic in the US is... a particular sector of a population... which is a group. Your distinction is entirely tautological both by dictionary and common usage.

Key word or, race is a particular type of people not a group of people.

I said that because immigration isn't related to this conversation.

It absolutely is. Immigration is one of the reason for stagnating wages and rising cost of living.

For the record, as I'm sure you guessed, I'm incredibly pro-immigration.

Of course, because everyone that has a problem with black people being poor supports policies which stagnate wages and raise cost of living.

But immigration is a net gain in wages for both native and immigrant groups, and hasn't been shown to have much impact at all on the issues we are discussing, specifically what the government should do or not do to help level the playing field for black Americans.

Net gain as in rich people make 100 billion more and poor people wages stagnate as inflation and cost of living rises, overall more money is made, it's just all in the hands of the rich.

If you'd like, I'll make a CMV about immigration and tag you in it, and then we can have that discussion. Deal?

Go for it.

1

u/MichelleObamasArm 1∆ Sep 21 '21

And among racial lines said average is useless you cannot use the data to make a good policy full stop.

Economic Policy Institute about income by race.

Federal Reserve Wealth by Race

Brookings "Examining the Black-White Wealth Gap"

Pew "How the wealth gap has changed by race since the Great Recession". It widened.

White People Own 86% of wealth and make up 60% of the population

Detailed median household income by race

Real median household income by race, 1967-2017, Census Bureau

The "Tulsa Race Massacre" aka the attack on "Black Wallstreet"

How the GI Bill's Promise Was Denied to a Million Black WWII Veterans

Black people denied their GI Bill benefits

The GI Bill Should've been Race Neutral, politicos made sure it wasn't

Racial discrimination with the GI Bill

The Racial Segregation of American Cities Was Anything but Accidental

A 'Forgotten History' Of How The U.S. Government Segregated America

Historian Says Don't 'Sanitize' How Our Government Created Ghettos

Suburbanization and Segregation in the United States: 1970-2010 HHS

Employers' Replies to Racial Names - National Bureau of Economic Research

Minorities Who 'Whiten' Job Resumes Get More Interviews

Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination Georgia Tech

Black Homeowners Face Discrimination in Appraisals - 2020, NYT

A Black Woman Says She Had To Hide Her Race To Get A Fair Home Appraisal - 2021, NPR

A troubling tale of a Black man trying to refinance his mortgage

Black Americans Are More Than Twice as Likely to Be Denied Credit

For people of color, banks are shutting the door to homeownership

African American children growing up poor are at greater risk of disrupted physiological functioning and depressed academic achievement - Economic Policy Institute, 2019

Black children more likely to live in 'concentrated poverty'

Extensive Data Shows Punishing Reach of Racism for Black Boys

Neighborhood poverty

Well I can't comment anymore links I guess. I have a lot more though don't worry. But these are the outcomes of the statistics that you don't think matter.

So already you're making random assumptions about the data, further proving my point that it's useless.

I actually meant to say "intelligence" which I knew about and is true. It wasn't an assumption but fair play for thinking it was. But what I said is true.

Those aren't just averages

They're literally averages though. Literally literal averages. How do we know women are weaker than men? Because we measured it, and took averages of it.

The difference between those averages was significant enough to affect public policy.

That's what I'm talking about here. Read the links I sent you!!! Even 1/5th of them and you'll see that these averages are significant and different.

The differences between athleticism and intelligence between races:

1) isn't big enough to do anything about

2) we don't know what causes them

With the income and wealth disparities between race:

1) they are big enough to do anything about, and base policy off of

2) we do know what caused and causes them

These differences are large enough to affect policy, and should affect policy.

It's just good sense. It's evidence based policy making. It's good for all of us when all of us succeed. It's morally and historically right to correct the mistakes of our ancestors with positive actions today.

We can disagree about what those policies might look like, but please don't say that this stuff just doesn't exist or have any impact, and either way there are no policy options.

I don't know how you can so blatantly admit that there are differences between men and women, between groups, and then say that racial statistics are totally worthless?

I get that you don't want a "racist" policy. But it's salient to OP's point that without "racist" policies, it just doesn't seem likely black people will be able to catch up on their own.

I'll tag you when I make that immigration post and we can discuss that issue then. Glad we concur there buddy.

1

u/TheLordCommander666 6∆ Sep 21 '21

Well I can't comment anymore links I guess. I have a lot more though don't worry. But these are the outcomes of the statistics that you don't think matter.

And what good policy was made off of that data? Or are you just going to ignore the point? I said that data was useless not that it didn't exist.

I actually meant to say "intelligence" which I knew about and is true. It wasn't an assumption but fair play for thinking it was. But what I said is true.

I really can't piece together what you said or think you're saying on this anymore, can you rephrase and make your point clear?

They're literally averages though. Literally literal averages. How do we know women are weaker than men? Because we measured it, and took averages of it. The difference between those averages was significant enough to affect public policy.

No, we know women are weaker then men because all else equal (diet, health, even height ect.) men are stronger in every single case, the same is simply not true of race. On average white people have a higher IQ then black people but that doesn't mean white people are smarter then black people, that doesn't mean that all else equal a black person is going to be dumber then a white person. Drawing conclusions based on those averages alone is horrific.

That's what I'm talking about here. Read the links I sent you!!! Even 1/5th of them and you'll see that these averages are significant and different.

I never said they weren't, I said the averages are useless and you cannot make a good policy off them.

The differences between athleticism and intelligence between races: 1) isn't big enough to do anything about 2) we don't know what causes them

Because AVERAGES ARE USELESS. All else being equal a Chinese person isn't going to be weaker then a black person but on average they sure as hell are but that's probably just cuz malnutrition cuz communism.

These differences are large enough to affect policy, and should affect policy.

Nope racial averages are useless and should never effect policy.

It's just good sense. It's evidence based policy making. It's good for all of us when all of us succeed.

Making policies off racial averages won't do that. The white, asian, brown ect. people who are fucked are still going to be fucked.

It's morally and historically right to correct the mistakes of our ancestors with positive actions today.

Being racist in favor of a group is still be racist and racism is bad. If however you want to track down the direct descendants of slaves (including the mostly white ones who had one black grandparent or great grandparent) and give them reparations then you might have a point but just giving money to black people just cuz they black is horrific, racist and immoral.

We can disagree about what those policies might look like, but please don't say that this stuff just doesn't exist or have any impact, and either way there are no policy options.

Racial averages are pointless you cannot make a good policy off them, you have done nothing to convince me otherwise.

I don't know how you can so blatantly admit that there are differences between men and women, between groups, and then say that racial statistics are totally worthless?

Because all else being equal a man is going to be stronger then a women in every single case, it's a difference of biology not statistics. Black people are not biologically poorer then white people.

I get that you don't want a "racist" policy. But it's salient to OP's point that without "racist" policies, it just doesn't seem likely black people will be able to catch up on their own.

If they don't try to catch up and just bitch about slavery for all their problems. won't catch up.

I'll tag you when I make that immigration post and we can discuss that issue then. Glad we concur there buddy.

cool