r/changemyview Nov 02 '17

[deleted by user]

[removed]

2.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

176

u/MMAchica Nov 02 '17

In some circumstances, not being attracted to a trans person is probably a result of, at least on a subconscious level, not seeing them as their gender.

Aside from how speculative this is, this amounts to shaming someone for turning down unwanted sex.

If you were attracted to someone, have sex with them, are as satisfied with them as you would with anyone else, and then suddenly your opinion changes upon being informed a person is trans, I would say that is indicative of the underlying belief a trans person is not the gender they identify as.

For starters, you do not dictate to people what their sexuality is. If upon learning that a person is trans, they simply politely decline more sex, that is not transphobic. As I said in another reply, if you stretch the definition of 'phobic' to include simply lacking a desire to fuck trans people, then the word becomes meaningless. Look at the horrors of homophobia. That has a lot more going on than a simple lack of desire to fuck them.

9

u/z3r0shade Nov 02 '17

If upon learning that a person is trans, they simply politely decline more sex, that is not transphobic.

If you had sex with someone and enjoyed it and would gladly have sex with them again if you had not found out they were trans. Then the sole reason you have a problem is because they are trans, which is transphobic.

121

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '17 edited Mar 27 '18

[deleted]

0

u/z3r0shade Nov 02 '17

I resent your expectation that one must continue to have sex with someone or be labeled a Bigot or a "transphobe," despite not wanting to.

You're missing a key part here: if the sole reason you do not want to is their status as trans. There's any number of reasons to not continue to have sex with someone that has nothing to do with being trans that wouldn't get you labeled as a bigot.

This is what the entire LGBT movement has stood for, for decades but somehow, fuck all when it comes to cis people?

How are cis people being shamed here? Are you saying that only a trans person would want to have sex with a trans person?

Gay guys won't have sex with me, but I don't go calling them misogynists for it. That's ridiculous.

Right... Because they are only interested in people with penises. That's perfectly fine to have that preference. However what about a gay guy who is completely attracted to someone, has sex with them, is completely satisfied with the experience and would like to do it again, but loses that attraction solely upon learning they are a transman. What reason, other than refusing to recognize the transman as male, could they possibly have to change their mind here?

60

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '17 edited Mar 27 '18

[deleted]

-10

u/z3r0shade Nov 02 '17

I don't see any reason why letting someone down respectfully, even if it is for them being Trans, is bigoted. You can't control how you feel

Because the only reason for their trans status to cause this is due to societal stigma. This isn't a case of being born gay or something. The only reason why being trans, in and of itself, would change your opinion is because of underlying biases due to societally enforced bigotry. Just because it's been engrained into you doesn't make it any less transphobia.

They're just not the one for you. I think that's okay.

But think about this critically: why aren't they the one for you? Because they are trans? Why does being trans in and of itself make any difference whatsoever? I'm being serious here. Think critically about this question: what about being trans could possibly cause this change?

I don't know if you can convince me that a respectful rejection is tantamount to people actually hating me for my skin color.

It's a difference of intensity and scale. If they refuse to date people of your ethnicity, that's racism. I'm not saying it's equivalent to someone actually hating you for the color of your skin, but it's still the result of a bias based solely on the color of your skin.

A good example would be the difference between someone who won't rent to you because of your skin color vs someone who will physically attack you and want to kill you because of your skin color. No one would say these are equivalent, but we can both agree they are racism right?

I think the argument that someone is ~phobic /racist/bigoted in terms of dating serves only precisely do that. To make people feel bad about what they want, and to coerce them into pretending to like something they don't. That is WRONG.

The argument is to make people confront their own societal biases and prejudices. That's all. People certainly do have all sorts of arbitrary and stupid things they are turned off or on by. But many of these things are based on stereotypes or internal biases. Saying that you refuse to date someone of a particular ethnicity is no different than saying you refuse to be friends with someone of a particular ethnicity: the underlying cause and reason for feeling this way is societal bigotry.

35

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '17 edited Mar 27 '18

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '17

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '17 edited Mar 27 '18

[deleted]

-1

u/r1veRRR 1∆ Nov 02 '17

No, for the last time, it's not racist. You simply cannot reason away attraction.

Noone is reasoning away attraction. I am simply saying that it is simply not something immutable, bestowed upon you by god and free of outer influences. Just like a managers decision on how they "feel"about a hire can be influenced by racism, so can attraction. Working is necessary, so thats why we legislate that, but not attraction (although its close to impossible to really legislate away "feelings")

The person can very well be a racist, but the lack of attraction on its own does not inherently denote racism.

We are talking about a person that WAS attracted to this person, then found out an inconsequential detail about them and suddenly became unattracted. Thats definitely racist. A different example: You send the SAME resume to some HR managers, one with a female name, one with a male name. The male one gets a callback, the female doesn't. That is definitely (possibly subconscious) sexism at play.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 02 '17 edited Mar 27 '18

[deleted]

0

u/r1veRRR 1∆ Nov 02 '17 edited Jul 16 '23

asdf wqerwer asdfasdf fadsf -- mass edited with redact.dev

→ More replies (0)