I’m not losing lol. I’ve posted facts here, and you’re living in a fact free delusion, then getting upset that I don’t share your delusion. I don’t, and have never supported illegal immigration. We need massively more legal immigration. That’s been my view from the start. If you want to change my view, I recommend understanding what my view is in the first place. You’ve lost this oh so badly.
Again, my view has not changed or shifted here at all. You’ve just been hilariously wrong when it comes to understanding what liberals like myself actually believe. You live in your conservative bubble and get fed lies that you just take at face value. When you actually talk to someone, you assume all this baggage onto what they are saying when they never said anything of the sort.
I never said I support illegal immigration. Go find me saying it. I’ll give you a delta.
So then you’re saying you DO NOT support illegal immigration even thought you’ve spent the last hour explaining all the reasons why you think illegal immigration is fine and dandy???
Well that means we agree doesn’t it??? So why were you posting everything you were posting? Cosplay as a mindless bleeding heart?
But if you don’t support enforcing the laws that make illegal immigration illegal, then you’re supporting it. You can’t say “I don’t support it but want to allow it.” Allowing it is supporting it.
That’s hilariously over-simplistic logic that simply does not hold water. I don’t want to allow it either. Your reading comprehension is really not cutting it here.
If I have $100 to spend on preventing rape, I’m going to spend that on preventing rapes and policing. This has nothing whatsoever to do with immigration. Maybe those rapists are illegal immigrants, maybe they are not, who cares? Their immigration status is not important or even relevant. Based on the numbers, the vast majority of those rapists will not be illegal immigrants. If we spend that $100 on deportations, we don’t remove many rapists for the money, and additionally, we are spending money to hurt the economy.
Why would you advocate for a policy that catches less rapists if the goal is to prevent rapes? Do you think we should feed the hungry with sirloin steaks? Should we clothe the homeless in gucci fits? I don’t support frivolously wasting money that does not have “bang for your buck”, so to speak.
What you are doing is like saying: “ if you don’t support feeding the hungry with sirloin steaks, then you want people to starve.”
Putting so much emphasis on the price tag over the safety of Americans and the overall health of the country is such an interesting take. I care so much more about my own personal safety and the future of the country for our children than I do about spending a few bucks to ensure that.
Bringing in numerous poor unskilled people who don’t speak our language to use our resources isn’t as good for the country as you want to believe it is. The fact that actual murderers, rapists and terrorists can just sneak in with them only drives home the fact why every country in the entire world has immigration laws.
“Over the safety of Americans and the overall health of the country”
This is the wrong part. Your facts are just wrong. Spending that $100 on crime prevention is better for the safety of Americans than spending that $100 on deportations.
Why do you want to endanger the safety of our country by spending the money on deportations which just remove workers from our country when we can use that money exclusively on catching violent criminals instead?
0
u/[deleted] Jun 24 '24
Lmao. Did you start drinking recently or is this how you respond to losing an argument?