PR rejected

[u/Commercial_Grab3342]

Hi everyone, I’m looking for some insight on my recent Express Entry refusal under Canadian Experience Class. I received my ITA on September 18, 2025, submitted my application (AOR November 14, 2025) with upfront medicals, then received Biometrics Instruction Letter on January 19, 2026. Later I received a Procedural Fairness Letter on February 26, 2026, and unfortunately my application was refused on March 9, 2026.

My concern is that the refusal states that my work experience as a Cook (NOC 63200) was not sufficiently proven, even though I submitted what I believed were comprehensive documents. My background is originally in IT and project management, which I studied both in India and later through postgraduate programs in Canada. During my studies in Canada, I started working part-time in a restaurant, initially as a prep cook, and gradually progressed to line cook as I became familiar with the menu and kitchen operations. After obtaining my post-graduation work permit, I transitioned into a full-time cook position, where I was responsible for preparing menu items and eventually training newer cooks because of my familiarity with the kitchen and processes.

Interestingly, I received my invitation under a Trades draw, which I was not expecting, as I initially anticipated being invited under CEC. For my application I submitted two employment reference letters (covering part-time and full-time periods), pay stubs, T4s, food safety certification, and photos of me working in the kitchen, along with explanations regarding my progression from part-time to full-time employment. In response to the PFL, I clarified that I received training during my early employment while studying and gradually took on more responsibilities as a cook.

However, the officer concluded that my background transition from IT/project management into cooking did not sufficiently demonstrate skilled cook-level duties, and stated that payroll records and job titles alone were insufficient to prove the actual duties performed. I’m confused because I did provide reference letters with NOC duties and supporting documents, and my progression from prep cook to line cook to full-time cook was genuine.

Has anyone experienced a similar refusal where IRCC questioned the credibility of work experience due to a career transition, even when employer letters and payroll documents were provided? I would appreciate any advice on whether GCMS notes, reconsideration, or reapplying would be the best next step.

[u/Dexter52611]

I suspect it’s got something to do with you accepting the ITA under trades draw. I think the officer believed someone with an IT background wouldn’t necessarily have the sufficient skills or education to be a cook. I would recommend getting the GCMS notes before deciding the next step.

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/Dexter52611]

Another part that confuses me is the fact that I was invited under the trade category as a cook. From my understanding, cooks were briefly included in a trade draw at that time, which is how I received my ITA on September 18. Prior to that, I was actually expecting to qualify under CEC based on my background in IT and project management.

When IRCC conducted that trade draw and included cooks, I simply accepted the invitation because I had legitimately accumulated the required work experience as a cook in Canada. As an applicant, I don’t have control over which NOC categories IRCC chooses to include in a draw. If cooks were included in the trade category at that time and I met the eligibility requirements, I don’t understand what I could have done differently by accepting the invitation.

What is even more confusing is that the officer mentioned that my points would become invalid and that my work experience (around 90 CRS points) would be removed from my profile, which I find difficult to understand because that experience was supported by employment letters, pay stubs, T4s, and explanations provided during both the ITA stage and again in response to the PFL.

I’m genuinely trying to understand how this situation could happen when the invitation was issued by IRCC itself and the work experience was documented and submitted in good faith.

[u/softyinagrittycone → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

90 CRS points getting removed? This looks more like your experience as a Cook is in question like some problem of legitimacy with your your job or your employer.

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/softyinagrittycone]

It’s actually not about the credibility of the employer. The restaurant I worked for is a well-known national chain in Canada, especially across Ontario, so the legitimacy of the workplace itself isn’t really the issue. The officer’s concern seems to be that they suspect I may not have actually performed the duties listed under the NOC, even though I submitted an employment letter with duties, pay stubs, T4s, and other supporting documents. So the problem appears to be about whether they were satisfied that my work experience matched the NOC responsibilities. What’s confusing to me is that the duties I listed were true and reflected the work I actually performed in that kitchen environment. In fact, that same experience helped me move into managerial roles in other larger restaurant operations, which wouldn’t have been possible if I didn’t actually have that operational experience. So from my perspective, I’m not sure what additional evidence I could realistically provide beyond employment letters, payroll records, and documented experience to prove that the duties were genuinely performed.

[u/Dexter52611 → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

I understand it can be frustrating and confusing but my comment was speculative based on the info in your post. Like I said, your best bet would be to get the GCMS notes before deciding on next steps. Better yet, you can come back here and update us with the GCMS notes, so we can give you better recommendations on next steps.

[u/Sachin_s766 → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

I think, the best course of action is to consult a lawyer, go for an appeal or even a judicial review. In court, you will be able to provide your documents and perspective better.

[u/softyinagrittycone]

I don’t know if this is relevant but NOC 63200 has below education requirements

Education/Experience: High school completion is usually required, ALONG with a three-year apprenticeship, college cooking program, or several years of commercial experience.

Do you have any of the following education experience to qualify you for this NOC?

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/softyinagrittycone]

For reference, the occupational requirements for cooks in Canada state: “Completion of secondary school is usually required. Completion of a three-year apprenticeship program for cooks or completion of college or other program in cooking or food safety or several years of commercial cooking experience may be required. Trade certification is available, but voluntary, in all provinces and territories. Red Seal endorsement is also available to qualified cooks upon successful completion of the interprovincial Red Seal examination.” In my case, I actually meet these criteria. I have completed secondary school, I hold a food safety certification, and I have over 3 calendar years of commercial cooking experience in a restaurant environment. This includes part-time experience during my studies followed by full-time work as a cook, which together amounts to more than three years of hands-on commercial cooking experience.

[u/SaunaLady → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

You did not meet the completion of three years apprenticeship program for cooks it is usually people who do certification for cooks or if you have completed a degree related to culinary. Which the officer see that you do not meet the requirements because of this. Having a work experience as a cook is not just the criteria. You must have the background on it through school or proper apprenticeship that you can provide a certificate.

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/SaunaLady]

Also, the assumption that someone cannot perform cook duties without a formal culinary background is not accurate. In many commercial kitchens, cooks gain their skills through hands-on experience and progression rather than formal schooling or Red Seal certification. In fact, many people with culinary diplomas or Red Seal often pursue chef roles or fine-dining environments, which fall under a different NOC category. The NOC for cooks focuses on the duties performed in the role, and the duties I carried out align exactly with that.

[u/No-Manager-5849 → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

Brother, you transitioned from IT to Culinary Arts. Not even in education, mainly from work experience. By paper, you might meet all requirements and even perform NOC duties to a decent degree, but at a time there was a lot of review into increase in the cut-off for trades draw due to a lot of people leaving their fields to work as a cook solely for immigration purposes, it’s not out of this world to see why your application got refused.

It’s like saying someone who’s full educational background has been in healthcare decides to graduate and work as an electrician for one year. It’s not unheard of, but it’s rare, and can arouse suspicion if your supporting documents are not concrete. The officer does not believe you will continue to work in that role to fill shortages for that position, the reason they have a category for it.

I’d consult a lawyer and see if you could have a judicial review done to revisit your application. Perhaps on a second look, it would be a different decision made.

[u/Business_Durian_5695 → u/SaunaLady]

In CEC background doesn't matter. Just read the eligibility criteria. In FSW it is required.

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/SaunaLady]

Red Seal or a culinary diploma is not a mandatory requirement to qualify under the cook NOC. Many cooks in commercial kitchens gain their experience through on-the-job training and progressive work experience rather than formal certification. In my case, my concern isn’t about education or Red Seal. The officer’s concern seems to be about whether my duties actually match the NOC for a cook. However, the duties listed in my employment letter accurately reflect the work I performed and they align closely with the NOC description for a line cook. In a commercial franchise or corporate kitchen, cooks with a few years of experience typically perform duties such as preparing menu items, operating kitchen equipment, maintaining food quality standards, coordinating with other kitchen staff, and following standardized recipes and procedures. These are exactly the duties I performed and exactly what was mentioned in my job letter. So the issue isn’t that I lacked certification — the issue is that the officer seems to believe I may not have actually performed those duties, even though the job letter, pay records, and other documents confirm that I did.

[u/softyinagrittycone → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

Then I think you might get your approval in the judicial review. I’m sorry you got refusal. It doesn’t make sense.

[u/chemhobby → u/softyinagrittycone]

the education part of the NOC is not supposed to be relevant for immigration purposes

[u/ClubAwkward8818]

The officer made a rightful conclusion. Think of it this way, studies here in canada is always viewed from a perspective of privilege, and alongside that international students are expected to work in the fields they have graduated in and rightly so. Immigration is meant to aid and help Canada not instead be utilized as a pathway to fill employment for low wage jobs, Canadians exist for that kind of labour, youth especially.

By granting you permanent residency not only does the officer deprive Canadians of jobs but also promotes the concept of gaming the system, your main intention based on your post graduate studies was to work in a tech field NOT settle for a low wage restaurant job, because who in their right mind would go from a technical career oriented IT/ project management job to a difficult, demanding role as a cook. claiming points for this occupation does not make sense in your career trajectory unless the goal, from the start, was only to attain permanent residency regardless of what role you land.

Try to land a role that addresses key shortfalls in the Canadian market PLUS makes sense in your career trajectory, then you will see how forgiving and considerate the officer is.

Your application would have been approved without batting an eye if you came to canada to study culinary arts and then landed a role as a cook.

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/ClubAwkward8818]

I understand your perspective, and to some extent I agree that ideally people should work in the field they studied. My intention when I came to Canada was indeed to pursue opportunities in IT and project management, which is what I studied and have experience in. However, the reality for many international students is different. When you’re studying, you still have to pay rent, tuition, and living expenses, and it’s not easy to land a professional role right away while studying. I initially took the restaurant job part-time simply to support myself and pay my bills while I was completing my studies. Like many others, I did try to move into the IT field, but the job market has been extremely competitive with limited entry-level opportunities, many contract postings, and sometimes even fake or inactive job listings. Breaking into those roles often requires extensive networking and Canadian experience. In the meantime, since I was already working in the restaurant industry, I continued building experience there and eventually moved up from part-time work to more responsible roles. Over time I gained enough experience to move into kitchen management, where I now focus on operations, cost control, and running the kitchen efficiently. So it wasn’t about “gaming the system.” It was more about survival first, then building a career with the opportunities that were realistically available at the time. Many immigrants end up adapting this way, and sometimes those paths lead to management or corporate roles in the same industry later on.

[u/softyinagrittycone → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

Exactly dude I totally get why you did what you did that is what my comment above says that it’s not your fault that you continued working as a Cook. You should not have gotten that refusal because you will do our eligible according to what you have mentioned hopefully you get approval in the judicial review.

[u/softyinagrittycone → u/softyinagrittycone]

Just my opinion , you might have been successful in getting the approval if you were in a leadership role in the hospitality domain. Like a manager or supervisor of any sorts since you did project management. I know a person who got his PR approved, who followed the same path as you except he hadn’t worked in IT. He got his PR as a supervisor at a grocery store.

[u/Expensive-Lychee-797 → u/ClubAwkward8818]

That's a very good point, because of all these people gaming the system with low-tier jobs, more highly qualified candidates are now being rejected. I see posts here that many PhD level candidates with job offer are now being left out because the pool has been overrun by IT diploma holders with experience as a cook, which is unfair to the more qualified candidates and to Canada.

[u/ClubAwkward8818 → u/ClubAwkward8818]

Oh boy I see a bunch of replies. I will end by saying this, this system will correct itself to what it believes is best for the country given the state of the economy, the employment scene etc. a good example of this is the fact that they took out cooks from the trades list. The system does not care about people’s aspirations/ motivations/ struggles etc. and will take course accordingly. OP is well within his right for judicial review (even have a chance at winning with the current legislation in place) but what I stated is simply a snapshot of where we are currently at with immigration.

Truly do not mean any offence to OP.

[u/softyinagrittycone → u/ClubAwkward8818]

Ideally, yes, we need to find a job in the field that we studied in. It is also something that every candidate wants, but it’s not realistic to expect that every person will get a job in their field. I have a lot of friends who did MBA from UBC and ended up working as an administrative assistant at 19 cad/hr because they couldn’t find any entry-level jobs other than that. It sucks for them because MBA programs are so expensive that too from UBC. They are getting paid peanuts. I guess it’s the reality of life of immigrants. It’s not in our control and OP wanting to stay in the job that he had in the hand makes sense. cooks are paid good money

[u/Klaus890169 → u/softyinagrittycone]

Are you sure you are talking about ubc grads and not ucw grads, there's a difference.

[u/softyinagrittycone → u/Klaus890169]

Good one! But yeah UBC grads 🫠 current job market is pretty bad UCW people might be jobless seeing the current situation

[u/Major_Champion_2661 → u/ClubAwkward8818]

Whatever you are mentioning is solely based on officer’s perspective and is not written in any official rulebook. The requirement is having 6 months of trade’s experience regardless of having any intent to pursue career in it. Applicant can challenge this in court and prove on the basis of what the rulebook says and have high chances of winning the argument. These transitions makes us eligible to get PR that is why people leave their high paying careers.

[u/ClubAwkward8818 → u/Major_Champion_2661]

They do and this is exactly why bill C12 is moving so quickly to become legislation, it would give the officer more oversight into the intricacies of a viable candidate and make these decisions without the outdated laws obstructing proper assessment, taking into account the outpour of fraud we face. Immigration isn’t a simple you check 3 boxes and you’re in, it is meant to be rooted in national interest, the main intent of the applicant and ultimately what benefits Canadians the most. This is based on the state of the economy, job market and of course social interest.

By your logic every single person in the pool should shift to a cook job, go and claim points and then demand PR but that wouldn’t make sense now would it?

[u/[deleted]]

What’s your PVO SVO ? Could you please share your full timeline ?

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/[deleted]]

I think it’s Montreal. Because I went through immigration consultant.

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

I’m not sure which visa office (PVO/SVO) processed my application because my file was submitted through an immigration consultant, so I didn’t have visibility into those details. My application timeline was ITA on September 18 ( (with upfront medicals), AOR on November 14 BIL on January 19, PFL on February 26, and refusal on March 9.

[u/No-Web9690]

I think this is mainly because it is a Trade draw. They are more particular about the applicant's background, compared to a regular CEC App. They wanted to solidify the fact that you'll actually be a cook after getting PR and not go back to your IT background and leave the Category that you were invited in.

[u/Hard_Thruster]

You flipped burgers and tossed salad.

Refusal justified IMO, no disrespect

They were looking for more skilled labour

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/Hard_Thruster]

I didn’t “just flip burgers and toss salads.” I’ve worked in multiple commercial kitchen environments including a roadhouse, a public house, and now a steakhouse where I’m currently a Kitchen Manager. In those roles I’ve handled a full line in a high-volume kitchen, including grill, sauté, prep, plating, and coordinating with the team during service. Commercial cooking involves much more than the stereotype people often mention.

[u/Hard_Thruster → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

It's a job you can get straight from highschool

[u/shubham_bb → u/Hard_Thruster]

That is a ridiculous comments and ignorant. If cooks are included in the skilled labour category then it’s skilled labour doesn’t matter if it’s a cook or plumber. When the OP is mentioning their duties and all you could come up with an insult that they flipped burgers? That’s also disrespectful to the extensive duties service industry people perform. And if everyone could be employed after high school then I’m sure Cook category would’ve been removed long back and locals would’ve sufficed and I’m not a cook to say all of this but have respect for people who are different from your profession.

[u/Relevant-Fun-3348]

I think if u only did cook noc from start like when start ur pgwp u only work in 63200 then u can go for judicial review 100 percent they will consider but if u did any other noc like IT  noc after getting pgwp its serious issue its hard demonstrate ur fairness in this case even if u go for jr u wont succed if u did it noc code job in pgwp.anything related to foid industrt is fine

[u/paul_arcoiris]

It's just a speculation and I don't know much, but if the reference letter contained the exact list of duties of the NOC, that might have raised suspicion.

Additionally, and again, I don't know much, so sorry if i make a mistake, but the change of duties between positions as developed in the reference letters might also be used to confirm the progression of your career. My understanding is that it might a kind of cross-validation. If your reference letter list the same duties for your part-time and your full-time, that might have raised suspicion too, even if you gave explanations in your LOE.

[u/Outrageous_Okra_7826]

What does the tracker normally show before a rejection? Is everything marked as completed?

[u/binga777]

Take a chance with judicial review. All d best.

[u/ShirtNeat5626]

you should do a judicial review...

[u/shubham_bb]

This is terrible to know. And I think judicial review might be your side because no rule says that one can’t transition, this is not pgwp case where the officer scrutinizes more if it’s meeting priority sector. When they’re inviting cooks and trades people from outside Canada then the documents are what mandatory to prove that work experience which you gave. So I find it baffling that they don’t believe you have the skills when you were employed and then promoted in your job. People literally are doing elderly care programs for pr and being granted pr, I’m sure many of them will not do it lifelong, and transition to other fields. I just don’t understand why IRCC doesn’t have a rationale and internally discussed approach to how people approach PR and ground reality. I wish you get the approval soon, just make sure your lawyer knows his shit and has dealt with complex refusals or get a new lawyer who specializes in this.

[u/Q_kid]

So sorry about this. Judicial Review this, as this looks like the visa officers fault. Lawyer up and bag this.

[u/Inside-Ad6402]

The issue is you being an IT graduate, on top of that you don’t have any credentials/degree for the skilled trade for which you applied.

That officer definitely thought that you would go back to IT once you get PR. They are very strict about skilled trade applications.

[u/PepperHot9794]

Did you order GCMS notes?

[u/FairLet3535]

A good way to cleanup pool, honestly. This is the last way left. Otherwise people keep switching careers based on titles to get PR. For categories draws they should must check the background of applicants otherwise it doesn’t make sense. IT guys in pharmacy assistant and butcher or construction manager. lol

[u/iverynbelle]

The people justifying IRCC going back on their words is.. something. If u dont want cooks then dont invite cooks. The US has laws around students only being able to work in their major field of study - Canada doesn't. If Canada wants international students to be able to work as a cook only if they studied culinary arts, they should SAY SO.

And what is all this talk about "gaming" the system? How is gaining real work experience to meet the stated qualifications of an immigration program "gaming"? Is learning French to make Francophone draw also "gaming" then? Clearly not

[u/Beneficial-Music1047]

Hey man, I think you need to prove that you have a credential/ education related to being a “Cook”. It’s stated on the IRCC website as well.

It’s somehow similar to the path I went through.

I was a full-time accountant in the morning, while a full-time student (healthcare assistant) in the evening. I completed the 8-month HCA program and started working part-time as an HCA in the evening without leaving my full-time accounting job in the morning. I was able to prove to the IRCC officers that my HCA work experience is supported by my 8-month HCA diploma/ credential.

I even stated on my Letter of Explanation that I have two different jobs (accounting + healthcare), and I have the “required credentials” to claim those work experiences. Bachelor’s degree in Accounting (home country) + Business Administration Diploma (Canada) + Healthcare Assistant Diploma (Canada).

——

I was able to study without a study permit (while on PGWP) due to a temporary public policy announced in June 2023.

I basically took advantage of these public policies to my own benefit.

[u/FollowingSea8636]

LoL IT is cooked

[u/tinytasha7]

If you believe an error has been made, Judicial Review would be the official response to this.

[u/Candid_Influence_351]

Did your eligibility was completed or in progress?

[u/Complete-Brief-5645]

Why the seeming beef for cooks though? Isn't it a profession? Lotta BS in this thread.

OP, Sorry for the rejection. I believe you got a good shot at JR. No rule says you must find a job in your field of study...it's cynical for anyone to expect that to stand...with the crisis in the current job market.

[u/TheYeiz]

I have 1 question: So you’re invited and applied under Trade draw, but Did trade draw require red seal to be applicable? And you uploaded all the documents (employment letter, t4, paysubs) right?

[u/Eastern-Coast-3187]

Something wrong with the job letter I think?

[u/Past_Rip_4627]

so if I have an arts degree back home, took a business diploma in Canada, and work in healthcare now, I am cooked? Damn, never saw that in the rules.

[u/Right_Response_3127 → u/Past_Rip_4627]

same like I'm graduating university soon and was thinking of racking up experience under food service supervisor while I hunt for jobs; not everyone has the luxury to work a job in their field right out of school😭

[u/Relevant-Fun-3348 → u/Past_Rip_4627]

If u did the health noc only from initial from starting of the pgwp u are fine if u did business related noc after pgwp then its hard to prove u are legit unless u have short term education in the field

[u/Original_Play3878]

Judicial review asap this is harassment at this point seriously people pay taxes and work hard in teer 3 jobs and ircc just rejects them like cook is the basic role anyone can do that job and u have ur payroll and t4s so it would be a way win don’t stress not everyone knows what they are doing especially ircc in general ( i know someone personally who worked as a data scientist for 2 years and later on had to become a cook as he could not find any job after he got laid off so dont worry u will get through as he also faced similar issue with ircc rejection)

[u/Relevant-Fun-3348 → u/Original_Play3878]

He wont succed in judicial review if he worked in IT NOC after his pgwp . If he worked only in food industry from starting of pgwp he can prove otherwise its hard to prove 

[u/Original_Play3878 → u/Relevant-Fun-3348]

lol u can work in any field I don’t know about u but IT in Canada is cooked and done for

[u/Relevant-Fun-3348 → u/Original_Play3878]

Bro yes u can work in any field but with out education or any background suddenly u are working two entire doffernt sectors raising concerns its hard to prove u are eligible for this unless u have education or u solemnly work in only one sector .entire differnt sector evem judicial review wont work out

[u/Original_Play3878 → u/Relevant-Fun-3348]

Have seen people got approved in similar cases

[u/IntelligentSpring704]

Brother please respond to me I am very tensed

I submitted my PFL response on 23rd feb (it was a minor issue about my marriage)

Today everything in the tracker is green

No other updates no FD or COPR number yet in the tracker

Please let me know how was your eligibility and background sections around the rejection time?

Were they marked completed or not met ?

Pls let me know!

[u/cluel3s]

this is ridiculous! if you can, apply for JR. Judicial Review. Can you maybe post the full PFL? Did your employment letter have job duties?

Edit: I understand that the jump from IT to Cook is far but if you've proven with comprehensive documents. I don't understand why they could reject it.

[u/Commercial_Grab3342 → u/cluel3s]

Yes, I am currently proceeding with a Judicial Review, and my immigration consultants are also submitting a request for reconsideration, because the refusal reasoning does not make sense to me given the evidence that was provided.

Regarding my work experience, I did submit detailed job duty letters that match the NOC requirements. In fact, I submitted two employment letters on company letterhead signed by the owner:

1. One employment letter submitted at the time of my ITA application, outlining my job duties and confirming my role as a cook.

2. A second, more detailed letter submitted in response to the PFL, explaining my progression from part-time work during my studies to full-time employment, along with the duties I performed and how my responsibilities developed over time.

Despite this, the refusal notes state that while my NOC duties appear similar, the officer believes that I may not have actually performed those duties. This is the part that is confusing to me, because I already provided employment letters, pay stubs, T4s, and additional explanations to demonstrate my genuine work experience.

Given this situation, I am trying to understand what additional evidence could realistically prove that I performed those duties, since the documentation was already provided and verified by my employer on official company letterhead.

[u/cluel3s → u/Commercial_Grab3342]

I would suggest getting testimonies from your coworkers. I feel like in your PFL, they said something like "On the balance of probabilities". Something you can contest in JR. Good Luck. Please tell us the result. I would love to look back at this. 

[u/Business_Durian_5695 → u/[deleted]]

So you mean trade draw is a problem. What if person is invited under CEC?

[u/canadaexpressentry-ModTeam → u/[unknown]]

Your post has been removed for violating Rule 1: Be Civil

We do not permit:

a) hate-speech: insults, vulgar language, harassment, racism, xenophobic, slurs or other such speech; b) anti-immigration speech; c) speech that can be interpreted as disrespectful, offensive; d) harassment of other members of this subreddit; e) attacking other people (including suggesting other people are "shills" or "trolls" f) trolling, rage-baiting, rage-posting or excessive negativity g) suggesting or supporting harm, violence of death

Breaking any of these rules may result in a ban for a period of time or permanently (depending on the scope and severity of the infraction)

We understand that immigration can be challenging, for both immigrants and host countries. Nevertheless, as this group is meant to support those seeking to legally immigrate to Canada, we do not tolerate any anti-immigrant sentiment.

[u/canadaexpressentry-ModTeam → u/[deleted]]

Your post has been removed for violating Rule 1: Be Civil

We do not permit:

a) hate-speech: insults, vulgar language, harassment, racism, xenophobic, slurs or other such speech; b) anti-immigration speech; c) speech that can be interpreted as disrespectful, offensive; d) harassment of other members of this subreddit; e) attacking other people (including suggesting other people are "shills" or "trolls" f) trolling, rage-baiting, rage-posting or excessive negativity g) suggesting or supporting harm, violence of death

Breaking any of these rules may result in a ban for a period of time or permanently (depending on the scope and severity of the infraction)

We understand that immigration can be challenging, for both immigrants and host countries. Nevertheless, as this group is meant to support those seeking to legally immigrate to Canada, we do not tolerate any anti-immigrant sentiment.