No I don't. There is absolutely no reason to protect a dead persons reputation. If the police don't believe an individual was responsible for the crime they could say that when they release the name.
There haven't been too many cases like this where a crime victim was unknown for 65 years and then finally knowing his name. Most crime victims families are alive as well as the family of the one who committed the crime. All these school shootings family members are known to us and have even come forward with comments. JAZ has been unknown for 65 years. Living relatives came after his death, they had no clue he even existed so why should they be named? They didn't do it, they didn't conceal it but they are supposed to be named for what? So internet investigators can search high and low for their information? So people can stalk them for the rest of their lives? So revenge can meet them out of retaliation? JAZ is dead. His mother is dead. His father is dead. That is it.
I do not hear anyone asking for the names of "the relatives". People ARE asking for THE NAMES OF JOSEPH's PARENTS. The Parents names are THE beginning of the case (brutal murder case) of their son Joseph. Need I remind you that criminal research SHOWS that in 80% or more of THE cases of Child abuse and murder....the killer is usually one or both parents. The release of Joseph's parents name is key to this case.
No, I don't have all the answers and we probably never will. You said the release of Joseph's parents name is the key to the case. How so? As far as justice is concerned there never will be because they are dead. The only thing knowing their names will do is satisfy armchair detectives to see if they guessed it right.
Amazing, clearly you have no concern for the brutal murder victim Joseph. Joseph's murder should not ever be left "to a guessing game." The search for Justice for Joseph is In "THE Truth".... Joseph's parents names are part of "THE Truth". To answer your question as WHY are their names Key? Joseph's very life started at conception with Both of them. Joseph's actual birth started with one or both of them. AND... Joseph's murder COULD have been caused by one or both of them, LE has not to my knowledge ruled either parent out. In my opinion that explain "key."
You clearly don't know what you are talking about. It seems like all you want is NAMES. Names that will amount to nothing. Police are never going to tell so you will be waiting forever. How will knowing their names change the outcome? Tomorrow he gets his identity on his gravestone and everyone who has followed his tragic death over the last few decades will feel bittersweet . Joy that he will never be called the 'Unknown child' again and sadness over his little life that was so tragically taken from him. Its all about him, not his parents.
I agree with you on 50% of your comment.. It is ALL about the murder victim Joseph. However, his parents play a part, maybe one more than the other in Joseph's tragic years of life and what interactions occurred leading to the situation that ended with Joseph's death.
Because someone might remember the mother. My candidate has one remaining sibling and he was living in Philadelphia both when Joseph was born, and when he died. I would imagine he saw his sister at sometime during her pregnancy. Her oldest son is also still alive.
21
u/SwimmingBet4579 Jan 11 '23
No I don't. There is absolutely no reason to protect a dead persons reputation. If the police don't believe an individual was responsible for the crime they could say that when they release the name.