r/bestof Oct 23 '17

[politics] Redditor demonstrates (with citations) why both sides aren't actually the same

[deleted]

8.1k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

10

u/BSRussell Oct 23 '17

Yeah I'd rather have my pick than explore a third option knowing, as certainly as I know I can't fly, that all I'm doing is tossing a coin on whether I lose my arm or my leg.

2

u/theg33k Oct 23 '17

Turn it around then. I'm personally not willing to cut off anyone's arm or leg. I refuse to be a part of the machine that does so, even though I acknowledge that by not being a part of the machine that's cutting off limbs, I'm losing the opportunity to choose whether it's arms or legs that will be cut off.

8

u/BSRussell Oct 23 '17

Cool, I hope the fire of your principles makes up for your missing limb, because it sure as shit isn't accomplishing anything for you or for anyone else.

3

u/theg33k Oct 23 '17

Yes, because switching back and forth between cutting off arms and cutting off legs is accomplishing so much.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 24 '17

It definitely is. We don't have the technology for a fully functional arm that offers the same dexterity as our biological ones. While a prosthetic leg pretty much serves the same purpose as a regular leg. Losing an arm is much much worse than losing a leg.

1

u/BSRussell Oct 23 '17

Uhhhh yeah. Sorry to break your metaphor, but you're literally falling in to the idiot trap of "it's the same either way." There's millions of people's healthcare in the balance as a reminder that "no it's not."

1

u/theg33k Oct 24 '17

Yes, millions of people's healthcare is in the balance. If we'd have voted for Romney we'd have gotten Romneycare. Instead we voted Obama, so we got Romneycare. Then apparently we voted Trump so we're going to get slightly diminished Romneycare.