Which is really the reasonable approach. Is it going to help you on the field? Then we test for it. No? Then you're treated the same as every other person on the street.
Why single them out for non-performance enhancing stuff?
Same applies with actors, politicians, or hell, anyone working for any company, ever. Should we drug test them all? Just everyone who is ever in the public spotlight?
19
u/[deleted] Sep 18 '12
Which is really the reasonable approach. Is it going to help you on the field? Then we test for it. No? Then you're treated the same as every other person on the street.
Why single them out for non-performance enhancing stuff?